Mission feed
Mission feed
Every move the crew made, in the order it made it. Not a spinner. This is the crew's own event log, streamed over server-sent events straight out of the run store. Stage errors are in here too, because a clearance tool that silently skips a shot is worse than one that admits it.
Getting everything ready Setting the run up and handing your commercial to the crew. ingest -> detecting shots pipeline 3 events 06:14:38.7
06:14:38.7
console accepted test_ad.mp4 (56.1s) for GLOBAL, EU, FR, DE, UK, AE, SA, BE-VRT
06:14:39.9
run run_5299053b6a62 started: asset=runs/uploads/427a1de64500/test_ad.mp4 markets=['GLOBAL', 'EU', 'FR', 'DE', 'UK', 'AE', 'SA', 'BE-VRT']
06:14:40.7
ingest -> detecting shots
Watching the film for the first time Cutting your commercial into its own shots, listening to the soundtrack, and measuring the picture for flashing that could trouble a photosensitive viewer. found 11 cut(s) in 56.1s of film ingest 2 events 06:14:40.7
06:14:40.7
watching the film end to end, hunting for the cuts
06:14:44.3
found 11 cut(s) in 56.1s of film
Getting everything ready Setting the run up and handing your commercial to the crew. ingest -> 11 raw shot(s) merged to 11 pipeline 1 event 06:14:44.3
06:14:44.3
ingest -> 11 raw shot(s) merged to 11
Watching the film for the first time Cutting your commercial into its own shots, listening to the soundtrack, and measuring the picture for flashing that could trouble a photosensitive viewer. 11 shot(s) to read, one at a time, no skimming ingest 1 event 06:14:44.3
06:14:44.3
11 shot(s) to read, one at a time, no skimming
Listening to what is said Writing down the words in each shot, so a claim that is only spoken is caught as surely as one on screen. shot_10 -> said nothing at all transcription 22 events 06:14:44.3
06:14:44.3
listening to shot_0 (1/11), 7.0s of audio
06:14:47.8
shot_0 -> 58 char(s)
06:14:47.8
listening to shot_1 (2/11), 7.0s of audio
06:14:51.1
shot_1 -> said nothing at all
06:14:51.1
listening to shot_2 (3/11), 7.0s of audio
06:15:06.5
shot_2 -> 82 char(s)
06:15:06.5
listening to shot_3 (4/11), 7.0s of audio
06:15:11.3
shot_3 -> 86 char(s)
06:15:11.3
listening to shot_4 (5/11), 2.7s of audio
06:15:13.8
shot_4 -> said nothing at all
06:15:13.8
listening to shot_5 (6/11), 0.6s of audio
06:15:17.4
shot_5 -> 39 char(s)
06:15:17.4
listening to shot_6 (7/11), 0.6s of audio
06:15:32.4
shot_6 -> 39 char(s)
06:15:32.4
listening to shot_7 (8/11), 3.2s of audio
06:15:35.5
shot_7 -> said nothing at all
06:15:35.5
listening to shot_8 (9/11), 7.0s of audio
06:15:37.6
shot_8 -> 36 char(s)
06:15:37.6
listening to shot_9 (10/11), 7.0s of audio
06:15:40.4
shot_9 -> said nothing at all
06:15:40.4
listening to shot_10 (11/11), 7.0s of audio
06:15:43.9
shot_10 -> said nothing at all
Watching the film for the first time Cutting your commercial into its own shots, listening to the soundtrack, and measuring the picture for flashing that could trouble a photosensitive viewer. flash detector -> Full-frame luminance flashing measured at 6.0 flashes per second between 30.75s and 32.08s ingest 1 event 06:15:57.4
06:15:57.4
flash detector -> Full-frame luminance flashing measured at 6.0 flashes per second between 30.75s and 32.08s
Writing down what is actually there Looking at every shot once and describing what it holds -- a glass, a hemline, a logo -- in neutral sentences, with no verdict attached. Every market will argue about these same sentences. shot_10 -> noted 3 thing(s) worth writing down analyst 34 events 06:15:57.4
06:15:57.4
looking at shot_0 (1/11) with no idea which country will object
06:15:57.4
observe -> shot_0
06:16:05.9
shot_0 -> noted 5 thing(s) worth writing down
06:16:05.9
reading shot_1 (2/11) the way a regulator would, ruleless for now
06:16:05.9
observe -> shot_1
06:16:12.0
shot_1 -> noted 1 thing(s) worth writing down
06:16:12.0
describing shot_2 (3/11) in plain words, no verdicts yet
06:16:12.0
observe -> shot_2
06:16:18.3
shot_2 -> noted 3 thing(s) worth writing down
06:16:18.3
shot_3 (4/11): what is on screen, not what it means
06:16:18.3
observe -> shot_3
06:16:25.7
shot_3 -> noted 4 thing(s) worth writing down
06:16:25.7
watching shot_4 (5/11) for the thing eleven markets disagree about
06:16:25.7
observe -> shot_4
06:16:31.6
shot_4 -> noted 2 thing(s) worth writing down
06:16:31.6
taking shot_5 (6/11) apart, one observation at a time
06:16:31.6
observe -> shot_5
06:16:37.6
shot_5 -> noted 2 thing(s) worth writing down
06:16:37.6
looking at shot_6 (7/11) with no idea which country will object
06:16:37.6
observe -> shot_6
06:16:42.1
observe -> shot_6
06:16:48.1
shot_6 -> noted 2 thing(s) worth writing down
06:16:48.1
reading shot_7 (8/11) the way a regulator would, ruleless for now
06:16:48.1
observe -> shot_7
06:16:53.8
shot_7 -> noted 2 thing(s) worth writing down
06:16:53.8
describing shot_8 (9/11) in plain words, no verdicts yet
06:16:53.8
observe -> shot_8
06:17:02.2
shot_8 -> noted 6 thing(s) worth writing down
06:17:02.2
shot_9 (10/11): what is on screen, not what it means
06:17:02.2
observe -> shot_9
06:17:08.5
shot_9 -> noted 4 thing(s) worth writing down
06:17:08.5
watching shot_10 (11/11) for the thing eleven markets disagree about
06:17:08.5
observe -> shot_10
06:17:14.3
shot_10 -> noted 3 thing(s) worth writing down
Getting everything ready Setting the run up and handing your commercial to the crew. analyst -> 35 observation(s) persisted pipeline 1 event 06:17:14.3
06:17:14.3
analyst -> 35 observation(s) persisted
Asking every market what it thinks One adjudicator per jurisdiction, all at once, each holding its own rulebook and looking up the statute behind anything it objects to. BE-VRT clearance -> at_risk (21 finding(s)) adjudicator 138 events 06:17:15.6
06:17:15.6
judge -> UK (33 candidates)
06:17:15.8
judge -> BE-VRT (60 candidates)
06:17:15.8
judge -> EU (30 candidates)
06:17:15.9
judge -> DE (60 candidates)
06:17:15.9
judge -> FR (63 candidates)
06:17:15.9
judge -> AE (30 candidates)
06:17:16.0
judge -> SA (40 candidates)
06:17:16.0
judge -> GLOBAL (2 candidates)
06:17:18.8
judge -> AE (30 candidates)
06:17:24.1
citation check -> GLOBAL GL-MISLEAD-01 for obs_shot_8_004
06:17:37.6
citation check -> GLOBAL GL-HEALTH-01 for obs_shot_8_005
06:18:01.2
citation check -> EU GL-MISLEAD-01 for obs_shot_8_004
06:18:06.8
judge -> UK (33 candidates)
06:18:08.4
citation check -> EU GL-HEALTH-01 for obs_shot_8_005
06:18:08.7
citation check -> SA SA-ALC-01 for obs_shot_0_000
06:18:12.0
judge -> SA (40 candidates)
06:18:13.4
citation check -> AE AE-ALC-01 for obs_shot_0_000
06:18:23.8
citation check -> AE AE-ALC-01 for obs_shot_0_001
06:18:30.4
citation check -> AE AE-ALC-01 for obs_shot_0_002
06:18:35.1
citation check -> FR FR-ALC-01 for obs_shot_0_000
06:18:35.8
citation check -> AE AE-GEST-01 for obs_shot_2_000
06:18:40.2
citation check -> DE GL-MISLEAD-01 for obs_shot_8_004
06:18:42.3
citation check -> AE AE-MOD-01 for obs_shot_3_001
06:18:42.3
citation check -> FR FR-ALC-01 for obs_shot_0_001
06:18:45.0
citation check -> BE-VRT BE-ALC-01 for obs_shot_0_000
06:18:48.8
citation check -> AE AE-MOD-01 for obs_shot_3_002
06:18:49.3
citation check -> FR FR-ALC-01 for obs_shot_0_002
06:18:51.4
citation check -> DE DE-CMP-01 for obs_shot_8_004
06:18:54.3
citation check -> BE-VRT BE-VRT-ALC-01 for obs_shot_0_000
06:18:54.9
citation check -> AE AE-MOD-01 for obs_shot_3_003
06:18:56.5
citation check -> FR FR-LANG-01 for obs_shot_1_000
06:18:59.6
citation check -> DE GL-HEALTH-01 for obs_shot_8_005
06:19:01.9
citation check -> AE AE-ALC-01 for obs_shot_4_000
06:19:05.0
citation check -> FR FR-ALC-01 for obs_shot_4_000
06:19:07.6
citation check -> BE-VRT BE-ALC-01 for obs_shot_0_001
06:19:09.3
citation check -> AE AE-ALC-01 for obs_shot_5_000
06:19:10.3
citation check -> FR FR-ALC-01 for obs_shot_5_000
06:19:13.9
citation check -> AE AE-ALC-01 for obs_shot_5_001
06:19:18.4
citation check -> BE-VRT BE-VRT-ALC-01 for obs_shot_0_001
06:19:19.2
citation check -> AE AE-ALC-01 for obs_shot_6_001
06:19:20.9
citation check -> FR FR-ALC-01 for obs_shot_5_001
06:19:22.3
citation check -> SA SA-ALC-01 for obs_shot_0_000
06:19:27.1
citation check -> AE AE-ALC-01 for obs_shot_7_001
06:19:28.6
citation check -> SA SA-ALC-01 for obs_shot_0_001
06:19:28.8
citation check -> BE-VRT BE-ALC-01 for obs_shot_0_002
06:19:29.2
citation check -> FR FR-ALC-01 for obs_shot_6_001
06:19:33.8
citation check -> AE AE-MOD-01 for obs_shot_8_000
06:19:35.7
citation check -> SA SA-ALC-01 for obs_shot_0_002
06:19:39.3
citation check -> AE GL-MISLEAD-01 for obs_shot_8_004
06:19:40.9
citation check -> FR FR-ALC-01 for obs_shot_7_001
06:19:42.8
citation check -> BE-VRT BE-VRT-ALC-01 for obs_shot_0_002
06:19:47.9
citation check -> SA SA-MOD-01 for obs_shot_3_001
06:19:48.5
citation check -> AE GL-HEALTH-01 for obs_shot_8_005
06:19:49.2
citation check -> BE-VRT BE-LANG-01 for obs_shot_1_000
06:19:51.8
citation check -> FR GL-MISLEAD-01 for obs_shot_8_004
06:19:55.3
citation check -> SA SA-MOD-01 for obs_shot_3_002
06:20:00.7
citation check -> FR FR-CMP-01 for obs_shot_8_004
06:20:00.8
citation check -> SA SA-MOD-01 for obs_shot_3_003
06:20:03.2
citation check -> BE-VRT BE-ALC-01 for obs_shot_4_000
06:20:05.6
citation check -> FR GL-HEALTH-01 for obs_shot_8_005
06:20:06.8
citation check -> SA SA-ALC-01 for obs_shot_4_000
06:20:10.2
citation check -> BE-VRT BE-VRT-ALC-01 for obs_shot_4_000
06:20:13.4
citation check -> FR FR-ALC-01 for obs_shot_9_000
06:20:14.5
citation check -> SA SA-ALC-01 for obs_shot_5_000
06:20:20.7
citation check -> SA SA-ALC-01 for obs_shot_5_001
06:20:26.3
citation check -> SA SA-ALC-01 for obs_shot_6_001
06:20:27.6
citation check -> BE-VRT BE-ALC-01 for obs_shot_5_000
06:20:29.3
judge -> UK (33 candidates)
06:20:33.0
citation check -> SA SA-ALC-01 for obs_shot_7_001
06:20:36.0
citation check -> BE-VRT BE-VRT-ALC-01 for obs_shot_5_000
06:20:38.5
citation check -> SA SA-MOD-01 for obs_shot_8_000
06:20:46.8
citation check -> SA GL-MISLEAD-01 for obs_shot_8_004
06:20:46.9
citation check -> BE-VRT BE-ALC-01 for obs_shot_5_001
06:20:56.4
citation check -> SA GL-HEALTH-01 for obs_shot_8_005
06:20:57.8
judge -> AE (30 candidates)
06:20:58.5
citation check -> BE-VRT BE-VRT-ALC-01 for obs_shot_5_001
06:21:07.9
citation check -> BE-VRT BE-ALC-01 for obs_shot_6_001
06:21:17.0
citation check -> BE-VRT BE-VRT-ALC-01 for obs_shot_6_001
06:21:27.7
citation check -> SA SA-PHARMA-01 for obs_shot_8_005
06:21:33.5
citation check -> BE-VRT BE-ALC-01 for obs_shot_7_001
06:21:37.7
citation check -> SA SA-ALC-01 for obs_shot_9_000
06:21:44.6
citation check -> SA SA-LGBT-01 for obs_shot_9_002
06:21:55.7
citation check -> AE AE-ALC-01 for obs_shot_0_000
06:22:00.7
citation check -> AE AE-ALC-01 for obs_shot_0_001
06:22:02.5
citation check -> BE-VRT BE-VRT-ALC-01 for obs_shot_7_001
06:22:06.3
citation check -> AE AE-ALC-01 for obs_shot_0_002
06:22:08.3
stage_error: market=UK: ClientError("429 RESOURCE_EXHAUSTED. {'error': {'code': 429, 'message': 'Resource exhausted. Please try again later. Please refer to https://cloud.google.com/vertex-ai/generative-ai/docs/error-code-429 for more details.', 'status': 'RESOURCE_EXHAUSTED'}}")
06:22:10.6
judge -> BE-VRT (60 candidates)
06:22:12.7
citation check -> AE AE-GEST-01 for obs_shot_2_000
06:22:19.0
citation check -> AE AE-MOD-01 for obs_shot_3_001
06:22:26.3
citation check -> AE AE-MOD-01 for obs_shot_3_002
06:22:32.2
citation check -> AE AE-MOD-01 for obs_shot_3_003
06:22:38.9
citation check -> AE AE-ALC-01 for obs_shot_4_000
06:22:53.1
citation check -> AE AE-ALC-01 for obs_shot_5_000
06:23:02.6
citation check -> AE AE-ALC-01 for obs_shot_5_001
06:23:08.8
citation check -> AE AE-ALC-01 for obs_shot_6_001
06:23:15.2
citation check -> AE AE-ALC-01 for obs_shot_7_001
06:23:24.1
citation check -> AE AE-MOD-01 for obs_shot_8_000
06:23:35.8
citation check -> AE GL-MISLEAD-01 for obs_shot_8_004
06:23:38.0
citation check -> BE-VRT BE-ALC-01 for obs_shot_0_000
06:23:46.7
citation check -> BE-VRT BE-VRT-ALC-01 for obs_shot_0_000
06:23:50.8
citation check -> AE GL-HEALTH-01 for obs_shot_8_005
06:23:53.3
citation check -> BE-VRT BE-ALC-01 for obs_shot_0_001
06:23:59.3
citation check -> AE AE-ALC-01 for obs_shot_9_000
06:24:07.3
citation check -> AE AE-LGBT-01 for obs_shot_9_002
06:24:10.0
citation check -> BE-VRT BE-VRT-ALC-01 for obs_shot_0_001
06:24:25.0
citation check -> BE-VRT BE-ALC-01 for obs_shot_0_002
06:24:31.5
citation check -> BE-VRT BE-VRT-ALC-01 for obs_shot_0_002
06:24:41.8
citation check -> BE-VRT BE-LANG-01 for obs_shot_1_000
06:25:54.1
judge -> BE-VRT (60 candidates)
06:27:31.5
citation check -> BE-VRT BE-ALC-01 for obs_shot_0_000
06:27:43.6
citation check -> BE-VRT BE-VRT-ALC-01 for obs_shot_0_000
06:27:55.9
citation check -> BE-VRT BE-ALC-01 for obs_shot_0_001
06:28:26.0
citation check -> BE-VRT BE-VRT-ALC-01 for obs_shot_0_001
06:28:34.8
citation check -> BE-VRT BE-ALC-01 for obs_shot_0_002
06:28:46.9
citation check -> BE-VRT BE-VRT-ALC-01 for obs_shot_0_002
06:28:55.6
citation check -> BE-VRT BE-LANG-01 for obs_shot_1_000
06:29:09.4
citation check -> BE-VRT BE-ALC-01 for obs_shot_4_000
06:29:21.0
citation check -> BE-VRT BE-VRT-ALC-01 for obs_shot_4_000
06:29:28.9
citation check -> BE-VRT BE-ALC-01 for obs_shot_5_000
06:29:36.6
citation check -> BE-VRT BE-VRT-ALC-01 for obs_shot_5_000
06:29:42.8
citation check -> BE-VRT BE-ALC-01 for obs_shot_5_001
06:29:51.2
citation check -> BE-VRT BE-VRT-ALC-01 for obs_shot_5_001
06:29:57.3
citation check -> BE-VRT BE-ALC-01 for obs_shot_6_001
06:30:04.2
citation check -> BE-VRT BE-VRT-ALC-01 for obs_shot_6_001
06:30:14.2
citation check -> BE-VRT BE-ALC-01 for obs_shot_7_001
06:30:22.8
citation check -> BE-VRT BE-VRT-ALC-01 for obs_shot_7_001
06:30:39.7
citation check -> BE-VRT GL-MISLEAD-01 for obs_shot_8_004
06:30:53.3
citation check -> BE-VRT GL-HEALTH-01 for obs_shot_8_005
06:31:05.0
citation check -> BE-VRT BE-ALC-01 for obs_shot_9_000
06:31:14.0
citation check -> BE-VRT BE-VRT-ALC-01 for obs_shot_9_000
06:31:22.8
GLOBAL clearance -> at_risk (2 finding(s))
06:31:22.8
EU clearance -> at_risk (2 finding(s))
06:31:22.8
FR clearance -> blocked (13 finding(s))
06:31:22.8
DE clearance -> at_risk (3 finding(s))
06:31:22.8
AE clearance -> blocked (17 finding(s))
06:31:22.8
SA clearance -> blocked (17 finding(s))
06:31:22.8
BE-VRT clearance -> at_risk (21 finding(s))
Getting everything ready Setting the run up and handing your commercial to the crew. adjudicate -> 75 finding(s) persisted across 8 market(s) pipeline 1 event 06:31:22.8
06:31:22.8
adjudicate -> 75 finding(s) persisted across 8 market(s)
Putting it all into Grafana Calling Grafana and making sure everything lands there: the numbers, the finding detail, the dashboards to read them on and the alerts that will wake the crew if something needs fixing. publisher -> connecting to Grafana publisher 1 event 06:31:22.8
06:31:22.8
publisher -> connecting to Grafana
Fixing the shots that failed Working out the cheapest edit that would satisfy the rule, pricing it, and changing only the seconds that were objected to. revoice applied -> localized_SA.mp4 (chg_daf4f03c4ad0); replaced the spoken line with "Bold, refreshing taste like no other." remediator 19 events 06:31:50.4
06:31:50.4
alert received: SA-PHARMA-01 SA on test_ad -> fnd_SA_SA-PHARMA-01_obs_shot_8_005
06:31:50.4
alert received: SA-MOD-01 SA on test_ad -> fnd_SA_SA-MOD-01_obs_shot_8_000
06:31:50.4
alert received: AE-LGBT-01 AE on test_ad -> fnd_AE_AE-LGBT-01_obs_shot_9_002
06:31:50.4
alert received: AE-ALC-01 AE on test_ad -> fnd_AE_AE-ALC-01_obs_shot_9_000
06:31:50.4
alert received: FR-ALC-01 FR on test_ad -> fnd_FR_FR-ALC-01_obs_shot_9_000
06:31:50.4
alert received: SA-LGBT-01 SA on test_ad -> fnd_SA_SA-LGBT-01_obs_shot_9_002
06:31:50.4
alert received: AE-MOD-01 AE on test_ad -> fnd_AE_AE-MOD-01_obs_shot_8_000
06:31:50.4
alert received: SA-ALC-01 SA on test_ad -> fnd_SA_SA-ALC-01_obs_shot_9_000
06:31:50.4
SA-PHARMA-01 (SA) -> planned revoice
06:31:50.4
revoice -> fnd_SA_SA-PHARMA-01_obs_shot_8_005 (SA-PHARMA-01, SA) on test_ad.mp4 at 35.08-42.08s
06:31:50.4
AE-ALC-01 (AE) -> concept scope, running prop_swap anyway: The element runs through the whole scene, so a patch cannot reach it: the scene has to be regenerated with the permitted element in its place.
06:31:50.4
AE-ALC-01 (AE) -> planned prop_swap
06:31:50.4
one edit for 4 findings on this shot: SA-PHARMA-01 plus SA-MOD-01, GL-MISLEAD-01, GL-HEALTH-01
06:31:50.4
prop_swap -> fnd_AE_AE-ALC-01_obs_shot_9_000 (AE-ALC-01, AE) on test_ad.mp4 at 42.08-49.12s
06:31:50.4
FR-ALC-01 (FR) -> concept scope, running prop_swap anyway: The element runs through the whole scene, so a patch cannot reach it: the scene has to be regenerated with the permitted element in its place.
06:31:50.4
FR-ALC-01 (FR) -> planned prop_swap
06:31:50.4
prop_swap -> fnd_FR_FR-ALC-01_obs_shot_9_000 (FR-ALC-01, FR) on test_ad.mp4 at 42.08-49.12s
06:32:22.0
craft gate passed: length 56.149s, 1347 frames, inf dB outside the edit
06:32:23.8
revoice applied -> localized_SA.mp4 (chg_daf4f03c4ad0); replaced the spoken line with "Bold, refreshing taste like no other."
Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_SA.mp4 verifier 2 events 06:32:23.8
06:32:23.8
verify -> also ruling on 3 other open finding(s) in the same shot(s): SA-MOD-01, GL-MISLEAD-01, GL-HEALTH-01
06:32:23.8
verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_SA.mp4
Writing down what is actually there Looking at every shot once and describing what it holds -- a glass, a hemline, a logo -- in neutral sentences, with no verdict attached. Every market will argue about these same sentences. observe -> shot_8 analyst 1 event 06:32:23.8
06:32:23.8
observe -> shot_8
Putting it all into Grafana Calling Grafana and making sure everything lands there: the numbers, the finding detail, the dashboards to read them on and the alerts that will wake the crew if something needs fixing. push_observations -> 35 observation(s) to Loki, 35 indexed for search publisher 2 events 06:32:26.7
06:32:26.7
push_verdicts -> 285 verdict(s), 210 of them a market looking and saying no
06:32:28.9
push_observations -> 35 observation(s) to Loki, 35 indexed for search
Asking every market what it thinks One adjudicator per jurisdiction, all at once, each holding its own rulebook and looking up the statute behind anything it objects to. judge -> SA (5 candidates) adjudicator 1 event 06:32:33.5
06:32:33.5
judge -> SA (5 candidates)
Fixing the shots that failed Working out the cheapest edit that would satisfy the rule, pricing it, and changing only the seconds that were objected to. prop_swap instruction: Edit this frame from a television commercial. Replace each alcoholic drink, bottle, glass, cigarette, cigar, tobacco pack or ashtray that is already visible with a permitted equivalent for France -- tea in the same style of glass in place of a drink, a pen or nothing at all in place of a cigarette, a closed box with no branding in place of a pack -- keeping the same number of items in the same places and adding none. Keep the lighting, the composition, the camera angle, the hands and the people exactly as they are, and change nothing else in the frame. Do not add any new object anywhere in the frame, and do not put a replacement where there was nothing before: only what is already there may change. remediator 1 event 06:32:37.5
06:32:37.5
prop_swap instruction: Edit this frame from a television commercial. Replace each alcoholic drink, bottle, glass, cigarette, cigar, tobacco pack or ashtray that is already visible with a permitted equivalent for France -- tea in the same style of glass in place of a drink, a pen or nothing at all in place of a cigarette, a closed box with no branding in place of a pack -- keeping the same number of items in the same places and adding none. Keep the lighting, the composition, the camera angle, the hands and the people exactly as they are, and change nothing else in the frame. Do not add any new object anywhere in the frame, and do not put a replacement where there was nothing before: only what is already there may change.
Asking every market what it thinks One adjudicator per jurisdiction, all at once, each holding its own rulebook and looking up the statute behind anything it objects to. citation check -> SA SA-ALC-01 for obs_shot_8_002_vf9279a adjudicator 3 events 06:32:46.0
06:32:46.0
citation check -> SA SA-MOD-01 for obs_shot_8_000_vf9279a
06:32:51.9
citation check -> SA SA-ALC-01 for obs_shot_8_001_vf9279a
06:32:57.5
citation check -> SA SA-ALC-01 for obs_shot_8_002_vf9279a
Fixing the shots that failed Working out the cheapest edit that would satisfy the rule, pricing it, and changing only the seconds that were objected to. prop_swap applied -> localized_FR.mp4 (chg_7935aad72d97); swapped the non-compliant prop for a France-appropriate one remediator 2 events 06:32:58.4
06:32:58.4
craft gate passed: length 56.149s, 1347 frames, 47.4 dB outside the edit
06:32:59.9
prop_swap applied -> localized_FR.mp4 (chg_7935aad72d97); swapped the non-compliant prop for a France-appropriate one
Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_FR.mp4 verifier 1 event 06:32:59.9
06:32:59.9
verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_FR.mp4
Writing down what is actually there Looking at every shot once and describing what it holds -- a glass, a hemline, a logo -- in neutral sentences, with no verdict attached. Every market will argue about these same sentences. observe -> shot_9 analyst 1 event 06:32:59.9
06:32:59.9
observe -> shot_9
Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. SA clearance recomputed -> blocked verifier 6 events 06:33:06.4
06:33:06.4
still open: SA-MOD-01 continues to fire at 35.08-42.08s; fnd_SA_SA-MOD-01_obs_shot_8_000 untouched
06:33:06.4
incidentally fixed: GL-MISLEAD-01 no longer fires at 35.08-42.08s; fnd_SA_GL-MISLEAD-01_obs_shot_8_004 resolved without having been the target
06:33:06.4
incidentally fixed: GL-HEALTH-01 no longer fires at 35.08-42.08s; fnd_SA_GL-HEALTH-01_obs_shot_8_005 resolved without having been the target
06:33:06.4
fixed: SA-PHARMA-01 no longer fires at 35.08-42.08s after revoice; fnd_SA_SA-PHARMA-01_obs_shot_8_005 resolved
06:33:06.4
verification surfaced 2 new finding(s) in the edited shot(s): SA-ALC-01, SA-ALC-01
06:33:06.4
SA clearance recomputed -> blocked
Writing down what is actually there Looking at every shot once and describing what it holds -- a glass, a hemline, a logo -- in neutral sentences, with no verdict attached. Every market will argue about these same sentences. observe -> shot_9 analyst 1 event 06:33:07.3
06:33:07.3
observe -> shot_9
Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. carrying revoice from SA into GLOBAL: 2 finding(s) on the same 35.08-42.08s (GL-MISLEAD-01, GL-HEALTH-01), no generation verifier 1 event 06:33:10.4
06:33:10.4
carrying revoice from SA into GLOBAL: 2 finding(s) on the same 35.08-42.08s (GL-MISLEAD-01, GL-HEALTH-01), no generation
Fixing the shots that failed Working out the cheapest edit that would satisfy the rule, pricing it, and changing only the seconds that were objected to. prop_swap instruction: Edit this frame from a television commercial. Replace each alcoholic drink, bottle, glass, cigarette, cigar, tobacco pack or ashtray that is already visible with a permitted equivalent for United Arab Emirates -- tea in the same style of glass in place of a drink, a pen or nothing at all in place of a cigarette, a closed box with no branding in place of a pack -- keeping the same number of items in the same places and adding none. Keep the lighting, the composition, the camera angle, the hands and the people exactly as they are, and change nothing else in the frame. Do not add any new object anywhere in the frame, and do not put a replacement where there was nothing before: only what is already there may change. remediator 1 event 06:33:10.6
06:33:10.6
prop_swap instruction: Edit this frame from a television commercial. Replace each alcoholic drink, bottle, glass, cigarette, cigar, tobacco pack or ashtray that is already visible with a permitted equivalent for United Arab Emirates -- tea in the same style of glass in place of a drink, a pen or nothing at all in place of a cigarette, a closed box with no branding in place of a pack -- keeping the same number of items in the same places and adding none. Keep the lighting, the composition, the camera angle, the hands and the people exactly as they are, and change nothing else in the frame. Do not add any new object anywhere in the frame, and do not put a replacement where there was nothing before: only what is already there may change.
Asking every market what it thinks One adjudicator per jurisdiction, all at once, each holding its own rulebook and looking up the statute behind anything it objects to. judge -> FR (8 candidates) adjudicator 1 event 06:33:16.2
06:33:16.2
judge -> FR (8 candidates)
Fixing the shots that failed Working out the cheapest edit that would satisfy the rule, pricing it, and changing only the seconds that were objected to. prop_swap applied -> localized_AE.mp4 (chg_18ad1f770b2a); swapped the non-compliant prop for a United Arab Emirates-appropriate one remediator 2 events 06:33:27.2
06:33:27.2
craft gate passed: length 56.149s, 1347 frames, 47.4 dB outside the edit
06:33:28.7
prop_swap applied -> localized_AE.mp4 (chg_18ad1f770b2a); swapped the non-compliant prop for a United Arab Emirates-appropriate one
Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_AE.mp4 verifier 2 events 06:33:28.7
06:33:28.7
verify -> also ruling on 1 other open finding(s) in the same shot(s): AE-LGBT-01
06:33:28.7
verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_AE.mp4
Writing down what is actually there Looking at every shot once and describing what it holds -- a glass, a hemline, a logo -- in neutral sentences, with no verdict attached. Every market will argue about these same sentences. observe -> shot_9 analyst 1 event 06:33:28.7
06:33:28.7
observe -> shot_9
Asking every market what it thinks One adjudicator per jurisdiction, all at once, each holding its own rulebook and looking up the statute behind anything it objects to. judge -> AE (4 candidates) adjudicator 2 events 06:33:37.9
06:33:37.9
citation check -> FR FR-ALC-01 for obs_shot_9_000_v22e411
06:33:43.7
judge -> AE (4 candidates)
Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. FR clearance recomputed -> blocked verifier 2 events 06:33:44.6
06:33:44.6
NOT fixed: FR-ALC-01 still fires at 42.08-49.12s after prop_swap; fnd_FR_FR-ALC-01_obs_shot_9_000 back to open
06:33:44.6
FR clearance recomputed -> blocked
Putting it all into Grafana Calling Grafana and making sure everything lands there: the numbers, the finding detail, the dashboards to read them on and the alerts that will wake the crew if something needs fixing. push_run_telemetry -> {'run_id': 'run_5299053b6a62', 'markets': ['GLOBAL', 'EU', 'FR', 'DE', 'UK', 'AE', 'SA', 'BE-VRT'], 'clearances': {'GLOBAL': 'at_risk', 'EU': 'at_risk', 'FR': 'blocked', 'DE': 'at_risk', 'AE': 'blocked', 'SA': 'blocked', 'BE-VRT': 'at_risk'}, 'risk_samples': '8 market(s) x 56s', 'logs': 75, 'annotations_created': 75, 'annotations_skipped_as_duplicates': 0, 'failed_stages': ['adjudicator']} publisher 1 event 06:33:48.9
06:33:48.9
push_run_telemetry -> {'run_id': 'run_5299053b6a62', 'markets': ['GLOBAL', 'EU', 'FR', 'DE', 'UK', 'AE', 'SA', 'BE-VRT'], 'clearances': {'GLOBAL': 'at_risk', 'EU': 'at_risk', 'FR': 'blocked', 'DE': 'at_risk', 'AE': 'blocked', 'SA': 'blocked', 'BE-VRT': 'at_risk'}, 'risk_samples': '8 market(s) x 56s', 'logs': 75, 'annotations_created': 75, 'annotations_skipped_as_duplicates': 0, 'failed_stages': ['adjudicator']}
Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_GLOBAL.mp4 verifier 2 events 06:33:52.1
06:33:52.1
verify -> also ruling on 1 other open finding(s) in the same shot(s): GL-HEALTH-01
06:33:52.1
verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_GLOBAL.mp4
Writing down what is actually there Looking at every shot once and describing what it holds -- a glass, a hemline, a logo -- in neutral sentences, with no verdict attached. Every market will argue about these same sentences. observe -> shot_8 analyst 1 event 06:33:52.1
06:33:52.1
observe -> shot_8
Putting it all into Grafana Calling Grafana and making sure everything lands there: the numbers, the finding detail, the dashboards to read them on and the alerts that will wake the crew if something needs fixing. mcp get_dashboard_by_uid('customs-overview') publisher 3 events 06:33:53.3
06:33:53.3
ensure_dashboards -> ['customs-findings', 'customs-grid', 'customs-history', 'customs-insight', 'customs-lanes', 'customs-market', 'customs-overview', 'customs-remediation', 'customs-timeline']
06:33:55.3
mcp search_dashboards('customs')
06:33:58.3
mcp get_dashboard_by_uid('customs-overview')
Asking every market what it thinks One adjudicator per jurisdiction, all at once, each holding its own rulebook and looking up the statute behind anything it objects to. judge -> GLOBAL (0 candidates) adjudicator 2 events 06:33:59.5
06:33:59.5
citation check -> AE AE-ALC-01 for obs_shot_9_000_v3131f0
06:34:01.2
judge -> GLOBAL (0 candidates)
Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. carrying revoice from SA into EU: 2 finding(s) on the same 35.08-42.08s (GL-MISLEAD-01, GL-HEALTH-01), no generation verifier 4 events 06:34:01.2
06:34:01.2
incidentally fixed: GL-HEALTH-01 no longer fires at 35.08-42.08s; fnd_GLOBAL_GL-HEALTH-01_obs_shot_8_005 resolved without having been the target
06:34:01.2
fixed: GL-MISLEAD-01 no longer fires at 35.08-42.08s after carried over from SA; fnd_GLOBAL_GL-MISLEAD-01_obs_shot_8_004 resolved
06:34:01.2
GLOBAL clearance recomputed -> cleared
06:34:01.9
carrying revoice from SA into EU: 2 finding(s) on the same 35.08-42.08s (GL-MISLEAD-01, GL-HEALTH-01), no generation
Putting it all into Grafana Calling Grafana and making sure everything lands there: the numbers, the finding detail, the dashboards to read them on and the alerts that will wake the crew if something needs fixing. mcp update_dashboard('customs-overview', replace $.description) publisher 1 event 06:34:02.7
06:34:02.7
mcp update_dashboard('customs-overview', replace $.description)
Getting everything ready Setting the run up and handing your commercial to the crew. run run_5299053b6a62 done pipeline 1 event 06:34:07.4
06:34:07.4
run run_5299053b6a62 done
Asking every market what it thinks One adjudicator per jurisdiction, all at once, each holding its own rulebook and looking up the statute behind anything it objects to. citation check -> AE AE-LGBT-01 for obs_shot_9_002_v3131f0 adjudicator 2 events 06:34:07.8
06:34:07.8
citation check -> AE AE-ALC-01 for obs_shot_9_001_v3131f0
06:34:13.6
citation check -> AE AE-LGBT-01 for obs_shot_9_002_v3131f0
Fixing the shots that failed Working out the cheapest edit that would satisfy the rule, pricing it, and changing only the seconds that were objected to. snapshot store=True artifacts=74 remediator 1 event 06:34:17.1
06:34:17.1
snapshot store=True artifacts=74
Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. AE clearance recomputed -> blocked verifier 3 events 06:34:19.4
06:34:19.4
still open: AE-LGBT-01 continues to fire at 42.08-49.12s; fnd_AE_AE-LGBT-01_obs_shot_9_002 untouched
06:34:19.4
NOT fixed: AE-ALC-01 still fires at 42.08-49.12s after prop_swap; fnd_AE_AE-ALC-01_obs_shot_9_000 back to open
06:34:19.4
AE clearance recomputed -> blocked
Fixing the shots that failed Working out the cheapest edit that would satisfy the rule, pricing it, and changing only the seconds that were objected to. stage_error: remediate: fnd_AE_AE-LGBT-01_obs_shot_9_002: RemediationBlocked('fnd_AE_AE-LGBT-01_obs_shot_9_002 is blocked from auto-remediation: rule basis targets a protected characteristic; human decision required') remediator 6 events 06:34:20.0
06:34:20.0
AE-LGBT-01 (AE) -> planned prop_swap
06:34:20.0
AE-MOD-01 (AE) -> concept scope, running prop_swap anyway: The element runs through the whole scene, so a patch cannot reach it: the scene has to be regenerated with the permitted element in its place.
06:34:20.0
AE-MOD-01 (AE) -> planned prop_swap
06:34:20.0
prop_swap -> fnd_AE_AE-MOD-01_obs_shot_8_000 (AE-MOD-01, AE) on localized_AE.mp4 at 35.08-42.08s
06:34:20.0
one edit for 3 findings on this shot: AE-MOD-01 plus GL-MISLEAD-01, GL-HEALTH-01
06:34:20.0
stage_error: remediate: fnd_AE_AE-LGBT-01_obs_shot_9_002: RemediationBlocked('fnd_AE_AE-LGBT-01_obs_shot_9_002 is blocked from auto-remediation: rule basis targets a protected characteristic; human decision required')
Getting everything ready Setting the run up and handing your commercial to the crew. snapshot store=True artifacts=3 pipeline 1 event 06:34:26.6
06:34:26.6
snapshot store=True artifacts=3
Fixing the shots that failed Working out the cheapest edit that would satisfy the rule, pricing it, and changing only the seconds that were objected to. snapshot store=True artifacts=2 remediator 2 events 06:34:30.7
06:34:30.7
snapshot store=True artifacts=1
06:34:39.3
snapshot store=True artifacts=2
Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_EU.mp4 verifier 2 events 06:34:42.2
06:34:42.2
verify -> also ruling on 1 other open finding(s) in the same shot(s): GL-HEALTH-01
06:34:42.2
verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_EU.mp4
Writing down what is actually there Looking at every shot once and describing what it holds -- a glass, a hemline, a logo -- in neutral sentences, with no verdict attached. Every market will argue about these same sentences. observe -> shot_8 analyst 1 event 06:34:42.2
06:34:42.2
observe -> shot_8
Asking every market what it thinks One adjudicator per jurisdiction, all at once, each holding its own rulebook and looking up the statute behind anything it objects to. judge -> EU (4 candidates) adjudicator 1 event 06:34:53.8
06:34:53.8
judge -> EU (4 candidates)
Fixing the shots that failed Working out the cheapest edit that would satisfy the rule, pricing it, and changing only the seconds that were objected to. prop_swap instruction: Edit this frame from a television commercial. Extend the black sports bra into a full-length athletic tank top covering the midriff. Keep the lighting, the composition, the camera angle, the performers and every other pixel of the frame identical. Add nothing that is not already in the frame, and do not write any text into the picture. The market is United Arab Emirates. remediator 1 event 06:35:01.7
06:35:01.7
prop_swap instruction: Edit this frame from a television commercial. Extend the black sports bra into a full-length athletic tank top covering the midriff. Keep the lighting, the composition, the camera angle, the performers and every other pixel of the frame identical. Add nothing that is not already in the frame, and do not write any text into the picture. The market is United Arab Emirates.
Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. carrying revoice from SA into FR: 3 finding(s) on the same 35.08-42.08s (GL-MISLEAD-01, FR-CMP-01, GL-HEALTH-01), no generation verifier 4 events 06:35:07.1
06:35:07.1
incidentally fixed: GL-HEALTH-01 no longer fires at 35.08-42.08s; fnd_EU_GL-HEALTH-01_obs_shot_8_005 resolved without having been the target
06:35:07.1
fixed: GL-MISLEAD-01 no longer fires at 35.08-42.08s after carried over from SA; fnd_EU_GL-MISLEAD-01_obs_shot_8_004 resolved
06:35:07.1
EU clearance recomputed -> cleared
06:35:08.0
carrying revoice from SA into FR: 3 finding(s) on the same 35.08-42.08s (GL-MISLEAD-01, FR-CMP-01, GL-HEALTH-01), no generation
Fixing the shots that failed Working out the cheapest edit that would satisfy the rule, pricing it, and changing only the seconds that were objected to. prop_swap applied -> localized_AE.mp4 (chg_81aaee9ec4fc); swapped the non-compliant prop for a United Arab Emirates-appropriate one remediator 2 events 06:35:10.4
06:35:10.4
craft gate passed: length 56.149s, 1347 frames, 48.0 dB outside the edit
06:35:11.8
prop_swap applied -> localized_AE.mp4 (chg_81aaee9ec4fc); swapped the non-compliant prop for a United Arab Emirates-appropriate one
Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_AE.mp4 verifier 2 events 06:35:11.8
06:35:11.8
verify -> also ruling on 2 other open finding(s) in the same shot(s): GL-MISLEAD-01, GL-HEALTH-01
06:35:11.8
verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_AE.mp4
Writing down what is actually there Looking at every shot once and describing what it holds -- a glass, a hemline, a logo -- in neutral sentences, with no verdict attached. Every market will argue about these same sentences. observe -> shot_8 analyst 2 events 06:35:11.8
06:35:11.8
observe -> shot_8
06:35:16.8
observe -> shot_8
Asking every market what it thinks One adjudicator per jurisdiction, all at once, each holding its own rulebook and looking up the statute behind anything it objects to. citation check -> AE AE-MOD-01 for obs_shot_8_001_v343ee0 adjudicator 2 events 06:35:26.1
06:35:26.1
judge -> AE (3 candidates)
06:35:37.4
citation check -> AE AE-MOD-01 for obs_shot_8_001_v343ee0
Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_FR.mp4 verifier 6 events 06:35:43.5
06:35:43.5
incidentally fixed: GL-MISLEAD-01 no longer fires at 35.08-42.08s; fnd_AE_GL-MISLEAD-01_obs_shot_8_004 resolved without having been the target
06:35:43.5
incidentally fixed: GL-HEALTH-01 no longer fires at 35.08-42.08s; fnd_AE_GL-HEALTH-01_obs_shot_8_005 resolved without having been the target
06:35:43.5
NOT fixed: AE-MOD-01 still fires at 35.08-42.08s after prop_swap; fnd_AE_AE-MOD-01_obs_shot_8_000 back to open
06:35:43.5
AE clearance recomputed -> blocked
06:35:44.7
verify -> also ruling on 2 other open finding(s) in the same shot(s): FR-CMP-01, GL-HEALTH-01
06:35:44.7
verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_FR.mp4
Writing down what is actually there Looking at every shot once and describing what it holds -- a glass, a hemline, a logo -- in neutral sentences, with no verdict attached. Every market will argue about these same sentences. observe -> shot_8 analyst 2 events 06:35:44.7
06:35:44.7
observe -> shot_8
06:35:48.6
observe -> shot_8
Asking every market what it thinks One adjudicator per jurisdiction, all at once, each holding its own rulebook and looking up the statute behind anything it objects to. judge -> FR (8 candidates) adjudicator 1 event 06:35:56.6
06:35:56.6
judge -> FR (8 candidates)
Fixing the shots that failed Working out the cheapest edit that would satisfy the rule, pricing it, and changing only the seconds that were objected to. snapshot store=True artifacts=8 remediator 1 event 06:35:57.4
06:35:57.4
snapshot store=True artifacts=8
Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_DE.mp4 verifier 7 events 06:36:12.9
06:36:12.9
incidentally fixed: FR-CMP-01 no longer fires at 35.08-42.08s; fnd_FR_FR-CMP-01_obs_shot_8_004 resolved without having been the target
06:36:12.9
incidentally fixed: GL-HEALTH-01 no longer fires at 35.08-42.08s; fnd_FR_GL-HEALTH-01_obs_shot_8_005 resolved without having been the target
06:36:12.9
fixed: GL-MISLEAD-01 no longer fires at 35.08-42.08s after carried over from SA; fnd_FR_GL-MISLEAD-01_obs_shot_8_004 resolved
06:36:12.9
FR clearance recomputed -> blocked
06:36:13.8
carrying revoice from SA into DE: 3 finding(s) on the same 35.08-42.08s (GL-MISLEAD-01, DE-CMP-01, GL-HEALTH-01), no generation
06:36:48.7
verify -> also ruling on 2 other open finding(s) in the same shot(s): DE-CMP-01, GL-HEALTH-01
06:36:48.7
verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_DE.mp4
Writing down what is actually there Looking at every shot once and describing what it holds -- a glass, a hemline, a logo -- in neutral sentences, with no verdict attached. Every market will argue about these same sentences. observe -> shot_8 analyst 1 event 06:36:48.7
06:36:48.7
observe -> shot_8
Asking every market what it thinks One adjudicator per jurisdiction, all at once, each holding its own rulebook and looking up the statute behind anything it objects to. citation check -> DE EU-ALC-01 for obs_shot_8_002_vebaafd adjudicator 2 events 06:36:55.8
06:36:55.8
judge -> DE (8 candidates)
06:37:11.8
citation check -> DE EU-ALC-01 for obs_shot_8_002_vebaafd
Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_BE-VRT.mp4 verifier 9 events 06:37:17.4
06:37:17.4
incidentally fixed: DE-CMP-01 no longer fires at 35.08-42.08s; fnd_DE_DE-CMP-01_obs_shot_8_004 resolved without having been the target
06:37:17.4
incidentally fixed: GL-HEALTH-01 no longer fires at 35.08-42.08s; fnd_DE_GL-HEALTH-01_obs_shot_8_005 resolved without having been the target
06:37:17.4
fixed: GL-MISLEAD-01 no longer fires at 35.08-42.08s after carried over from SA; fnd_DE_GL-MISLEAD-01_obs_shot_8_004 resolved
06:37:17.4
verification surfaced 1 new finding(s) in the edited shot(s): EU-ALC-01
06:37:17.4
DE clearance recomputed -> blocked
06:37:19.2
AE objects to the same 35.08-42.08s, but has already edited that span for itself; leaving its cut alone
06:37:19.2
carrying revoice from SA into BE-VRT: 2 finding(s) on the same 35.08-42.08s (GL-MISLEAD-01, GL-HEALTH-01), no generation
06:37:52.2
verify -> also ruling on 1 other open finding(s) in the same shot(s): GL-HEALTH-01
06:37:52.2
verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_BE-VRT.mp4
Writing down what is actually there Looking at every shot once and describing what it holds -- a glass, a hemline, a logo -- in neutral sentences, with no verdict attached. Every market will argue about these same sentences. observe -> shot_8 analyst 1 event 06:37:52.2
06:37:52.2
observe -> shot_8
Fixing the shots that failed Working out the cheapest edit that would satisfy the rule, pricing it, and changing only the seconds that were objected to. prop_swap -> fnd_DE_EU-ALC-01_obs_shot_8_002_vebaafd (EU-ALC-01, DE) on localized_DE.mp4 at 35.08-42.08s remediator 3 events 06:37:54.8
06:37:54.8
alert received: EU-ALC-01 DE on test_ad -> fnd_DE_EU-ALC-01_obs_shot_8_002_vebaafd
06:37:54.8
EU-ALC-01 (DE) -> planned prop_swap
06:37:54.8
prop_swap -> fnd_DE_EU-ALC-01_obs_shot_8_002_vebaafd (EU-ALC-01, DE) on localized_DE.mp4 at 35.08-42.08s
Asking every market what it thinks One adjudicator per jurisdiction, all at once, each holding its own rulebook and looking up the statute behind anything it objects to. judge -> BE-VRT (8 candidates) adjudicator 2 events 06:38:09.3
06:38:09.3
judge -> BE-VRT (8 candidates)
06:38:11.7
judge -> BE-VRT (8 candidates)
Fixing the shots that failed Working out the cheapest edit that would satisfy the rule, pricing it, and changing only the seconds that were objected to. prop_swap instruction: Edit this frame from a television commercial. Replace each alcoholic drink, bottle, glass, cigarette, cigar, tobacco pack or ashtray that is already visible with a permitted equivalent for Germany -- tea in the same style of glass in place of a drink, a pen or nothing at all in place of a cigarette, a closed box with no branding in place of a pack -- keeping the same number of items in the same places and adding none. Keep the lighting, the composition, the camera angle, the hands and the people exactly as they are, and change nothing else in the frame. Do not add any new object anywhere in the frame, and do not put a replacement where there was nothing before: only what is already there may change. remediator 1 event 06:38:29.2
06:38:29.2
prop_swap instruction: Edit this frame from a television commercial. Replace each alcoholic drink, bottle, glass, cigarette, cigar, tobacco pack or ashtray that is already visible with a permitted equivalent for Germany -- tea in the same style of glass in place of a drink, a pen or nothing at all in place of a cigarette, a closed box with no branding in place of a pack -- keeping the same number of items in the same places and adding none. Keep the lighting, the composition, the camera angle, the hands and the people exactly as they are, and change nothing else in the frame. Do not add any new object anywhere in the frame, and do not put a replacement where there was nothing before: only what is already there may change.
Asking every market what it thinks One adjudicator per jurisdiction, all at once, each holding its own rulebook and looking up the statute behind anything it objects to. citation check -> BE-VRT BE-VRT-ALC-01 for obs_shot_8_001_vc2e872 adjudicator 1 event 06:38:34.5
06:38:34.5
citation check -> BE-VRT BE-VRT-ALC-01 for obs_shot_8_001_vc2e872
Fixing the shots that failed Working out the cheapest edit that would satisfy the rule, pricing it, and changing only the seconds that were objected to. prop_swap applied -> localized_DE.mp4 (chg_3d1d0520cbaa); swapped the non-compliant prop for a Germany-appropriate one remediator 2 events 06:38:37.3
06:38:37.3
craft gate passed: length 56.149s, 1347 frames, 48.0 dB outside the edit
06:38:37.7
prop_swap applied -> localized_DE.mp4 (chg_3d1d0520cbaa); swapped the non-compliant prop for a Germany-appropriate one
Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_DE.mp4 verifier 1 event 06:38:37.7
06:38:37.7
verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_DE.mp4
Writing down what is actually there Looking at every shot once and describing what it holds -- a glass, a hemline, a logo -- in neutral sentences, with no verdict attached. Every market will argue about these same sentences. observe -> shot_8 analyst 1 event 06:38:37.7
06:38:37.7
observe -> shot_8
Asking every market what it thinks One adjudicator per jurisdiction, all at once, each holding its own rulebook and looking up the statute behind anything it objects to. citation check -> BE-VRT BE-VRT-ALC-01 for obs_shot_8_002_vc2e872 adjudicator 4 events 06:38:43.5
06:38:43.5
citation check -> BE-VRT EU-ALC-01 for obs_shot_8_002_vc2e872
06:38:44.2
judge -> DE (8 candidates)
06:38:50.0
citation check -> BE-VRT BE-ALC-01 for obs_shot_8_002_vc2e872
06:38:57.8
citation check -> BE-VRT BE-VRT-ALC-01 for obs_shot_8_002_vc2e872
Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. DE clearance recomputed -> cleared verifier 6 events 06:39:04.1
06:39:04.1
incidentally fixed: GL-HEALTH-01 no longer fires at 35.08-42.08s; fnd_BE-VRT_GL-HEALTH-01_obs_shot_8_005 resolved without having been the target
06:39:04.1
fixed: GL-MISLEAD-01 no longer fires at 35.08-42.08s after carried over from SA; fnd_BE-VRT_GL-MISLEAD-01_obs_shot_8_004 resolved
06:39:04.1
verification surfaced 4 new finding(s) in the edited shot(s): BE-ALC-01, BE-VRT-ALC-01, BE-VRT-ALC-01, EU-ALC-01
06:39:04.1
BE-VRT clearance recomputed -> blocked
06:39:07.6
fixed: EU-ALC-01 no longer fires at 35.08-42.08s after prop_swap; fnd_DE_EU-ALC-01_obs_shot_8_002_vebaafd resolved
06:39:07.6
DE clearance recomputed -> cleared
Fixing the shots that failed Working out the cheapest edit that would satisfy the rule, pricing it, and changing only the seconds that were objected to. one edit for 3 findings on this shot: SA-MOD-01 plus SA-ALC-01, SA-ALC-01 remediator 4 events 06:39:07.9
06:39:07.9
SA-MOD-01 (SA) -> concept scope, running prop_swap anyway: The element runs through the whole scene, so a patch cannot reach it: the scene has to be regenerated with the permitted element in its place.
06:39:07.9
SA-MOD-01 (SA) -> planned prop_swap
06:39:07.9
prop_swap -> fnd_SA_SA-MOD-01_obs_shot_8_000 (SA-MOD-01, SA) on localized_SA.mp4 at 35.08-42.08s
06:39:07.9
one edit for 3 findings on this shot: SA-MOD-01 plus SA-ALC-01, SA-ALC-01
Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. BE-VRT objects to the same 35.08-42.08s, but has already edited that span for itself; leaving its cut alone verifier 2 events 06:39:08.3
06:39:08.3
AE objects to the same 35.08-42.08s, but has already edited that span for itself; leaving its cut alone
06:39:08.3
BE-VRT objects to the same 35.08-42.08s, but has already edited that span for itself; leaving its cut alone
Fixing the shots that failed Working out the cheapest edit that would satisfy the rule, pricing it, and changing only the seconds that were objected to. prop_swap applied -> localized_SA.mp4 (chg_e5f2be415c1d); swapped the non-compliant prop for a Saudi Arabia-appropriate one remediator 5 events 06:39:23.2
06:39:23.2
snapshot store=True artifacts=14
06:39:30.8
snapshot store=True artifacts=2
06:39:45.1
prop_swap instruction: Edit this frame from a television commercial. Composite a fitted, high-neck athletic training t-shirt covering the woman's midriff and arms. Keep the lighting, the composition, the camera angle, the performers and every other pixel of the frame identical. Add nothing that is not already in the frame, and do not write any text into the picture. The market is Saudi Arabia.
06:39:53.6
craft gate passed: length 56.149s, 1347 frames, 47.2 dB outside the edit
06:39:54.0
prop_swap applied -> localized_SA.mp4 (chg_e5f2be415c1d); swapped the non-compliant prop for a Saudi Arabia-appropriate one
Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_SA.mp4 verifier 2 events 06:39:54.0
06:39:54.0
verify -> also ruling on 2 other open finding(s) in the same shot(s): SA-ALC-01, SA-ALC-01
06:39:54.0
verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_SA.mp4
Writing down what is actually there Looking at every shot once and describing what it holds -- a glass, a hemline, a logo -- in neutral sentences, with no verdict attached. Every market will argue about these same sentences. observe -> shot_8 analyst 1 event 06:39:54.0
06:39:54.0
observe -> shot_8
Fixing the shots that failed Working out the cheapest edit that would satisfy the rule, pricing it, and changing only the seconds that were objected to. one edit for 4 findings on this shot: EU-ALC-01 plus BE-VRT-ALC-01, BE-ALC-01, BE-VRT-ALC-01 remediator 4 events 06:39:57.3
06:39:57.3
alert received: EU-ALC-01 BE-VRT on test_ad -> fnd_BE-VRT_EU-ALC-01_obs_shot_8_002_vc2e872
06:39:57.3
EU-ALC-01 (BE-VRT) -> planned prop_swap
06:39:57.3
prop_swap -> fnd_BE-VRT_EU-ALC-01_obs_shot_8_002_vc2e872 (EU-ALC-01, BE-VRT) on localized_BE-VRT.mp4 at 35.08-42.08s
06:39:57.3
one edit for 4 findings on this shot: EU-ALC-01 plus BE-VRT-ALC-01, BE-ALC-01, BE-VRT-ALC-01
Asking every market what it thinks One adjudicator per jurisdiction, all at once, each holding its own rulebook and looking up the statute behind anything it objects to. citation check -> SA SA-MOD-01 for obs_shot_8_000_vb975f3 adjudicator 2 events 06:40:01.3
06:40:01.3
judge -> SA (5 candidates)
06:40:08.5
citation check -> SA SA-MOD-01 for obs_shot_8_000_vb975f3
Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. SA clearance recomputed -> blocked verifier 4 events 06:40:13.4
06:40:13.4
incidentally fixed: SA-ALC-01 no longer fires at 35.08-42.08s; fnd_SA_SA-ALC-01_obs_shot_8_001_vf9279a resolved without having been the target
06:40:13.4
incidentally fixed: SA-ALC-01 no longer fires at 35.08-42.08s; fnd_SA_SA-ALC-01_obs_shot_8_002_vf9279a resolved without having been the target
06:40:13.4
NOT fixed: SA-MOD-01 still fires at 35.08-42.08s after prop_swap; fnd_SA_SA-MOD-01_obs_shot_8_000 back to open
06:40:13.4
SA clearance recomputed -> blocked
Fixing the shots that failed Working out the cheapest edit that would satisfy the rule, pricing it, and changing only the seconds that were objected to. prop_swap applied -> localized_BE-VRT.mp4 (chg_da3f6e44e406); swapped the non-compliant prop for a VRT (Belgium, Flanders)-appropriate one remediator 10 events 06:40:14.1
06:40:14.1
SA-LGBT-01 (SA) -> planned prop_swap
06:40:14.1
stage_error: remediate: fnd_SA_SA-LGBT-01_obs_shot_9_002: RemediationBlocked('fnd_SA_SA-LGBT-01_obs_shot_9_002 is blocked from auto-remediation: rule basis targets a protected characteristic; human decision required')
06:40:14.1
SA-ALC-01 (SA) -> concept scope, running prop_swap anyway: The element runs through the whole scene, so a patch cannot reach it: the scene has to be regenerated with the permitted element in its place.
06:40:14.1
SA-ALC-01 (SA) -> planned prop_swap
06:40:14.1
prop_swap -> fnd_SA_SA-ALC-01_obs_shot_9_000 (SA-ALC-01, SA) on localized_SA.mp4 at 42.08-49.12s
06:40:35.9
prop_swap instruction: Edit this frame from a television commercial. Replace each alcoholic drink, bottle, glass, cigarette, cigar, tobacco pack or ashtray that is already visible with a permitted equivalent for VRT (Belgium, Flanders) -- tea in the same style of glass in place of a drink, a pen or nothing at all in place of a cigarette, a closed box with no branding in place of a pack -- keeping the same number of items in the same places and adding none. Keep the lighting, the composition, the camera angle, the hands and the people exactly as they are, and change nothing else in the frame. Do not add any new object anywhere in the frame, and do not put a replacement where there was nothing before: only what is already there may change.
06:40:38.1
snapshot store=True artifacts=9
06:40:48.0
snapshot store=True artifacts=2
06:40:48.0
craft gate passed: length 56.149s, 1347 frames, 48.0 dB outside the edit
06:40:49.4
prop_swap applied -> localized_BE-VRT.mp4 (chg_da3f6e44e406); swapped the non-compliant prop for a VRT (Belgium, Flanders)-appropriate one
Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_BE-VRT.mp4 verifier 2 events 06:40:49.4
06:40:49.4
verify -> also ruling on 3 other open finding(s) in the same shot(s): BE-VRT-ALC-01, BE-ALC-01, BE-VRT-ALC-01
06:40:49.4
verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_BE-VRT.mp4
Writing down what is actually there Looking at every shot once and describing what it holds -- a glass, a hemline, a logo -- in neutral sentences, with no verdict attached. Every market will argue about these same sentences. observe -> shot_8 analyst 1 event 06:40:49.4
06:40:49.4
observe -> shot_8
Asking every market what it thinks One adjudicator per jurisdiction, all at once, each holding its own rulebook and looking up the statute behind anything it objects to. citation check -> BE-VRT EU-ALC-01 for obs_shot_8_002_v9e016d adjudicator 2 events 06:40:58.6
06:40:58.6
judge -> BE-VRT (8 candidates)
06:41:10.0
citation check -> BE-VRT EU-ALC-01 for obs_shot_8_002_v9e016d
Fixing the shots that failed Working out the cheapest edit that would satisfy the rule, pricing it, and changing only the seconds that were objected to. craft gate passed: length 56.149s, 1347 frames, 48.2 dB outside the edit remediator 5 events 06:41:11.7
06:41:11.7
alert received: SA-MOD-01 SA on test_ad -> fnd_SA_SA-MOD-01_obs_shot_8_000
06:41:11.7
alert received: SA-ALC-01 SA on test_ad -> fnd_SA_SA-ALC-01_obs_shot_7_001
06:41:11.7
alert received: SA-LGBT-01 SA on test_ad -> fnd_SA_SA-LGBT-01_obs_shot_9_002
06:41:11.9
prop_swap instruction: Edit this frame from a television commercial. Replace each alcoholic drink, bottle, glass, cigarette, cigar, tobacco pack or ashtray that is already visible with a permitted equivalent for Saudi Arabia -- tea in the same style of glass in place of a drink, a pen or nothing at all in place of a cigarette, a closed box with no branding in place of a pack -- keeping the same number of items in the same places and adding none. Keep the lighting, the composition, the camera angle, the hands and the people exactly as they are, and change nothing else in the frame. Do not add any new object anywhere in the frame, and do not put a replacement where there was nothing before: only what is already there may change.
06:41:20.8
craft gate passed: length 56.149s, 1347 frames, 48.2 dB outside the edit
Asking every market what it thinks One adjudicator per jurisdiction, all at once, each holding its own rulebook and looking up the statute behind anything it objects to. citation check -> BE-VRT BE-ALC-01 for obs_shot_8_002_v9e016d adjudicator 1 event 06:41:20.8
06:41:20.8
citation check -> BE-VRT BE-ALC-01 for obs_shot_8_002_v9e016d
Fixing the shots that failed Working out the cheapest edit that would satisfy the rule, pricing it, and changing only the seconds that were objected to. prop_swap applied -> localized_SA.mp4 (chg_09bc2eefb74c); swapped the non-compliant prop for a Saudi Arabia-appropriate one remediator 1 event 06:41:21.2
06:41:21.2
prop_swap applied -> localized_SA.mp4 (chg_09bc2eefb74c); swapped the non-compliant prop for a Saudi Arabia-appropriate one
Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_SA.mp4 verifier 2 events 06:41:21.2
06:41:21.2
verify -> also ruling on 1 other open finding(s) in the same shot(s): SA-LGBT-01
06:41:21.2
verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_SA.mp4
Writing down what is actually there Looking at every shot once and describing what it holds -- a glass, a hemline, a logo -- in neutral sentences, with no verdict attached. Every market will argue about these same sentences. observe -> shot_9 analyst 2 events 06:41:21.2
06:41:21.2
observe -> shot_9
06:41:27.1
observe -> shot_9
Asking every market what it thinks One adjudicator per jurisdiction, all at once, each holding its own rulebook and looking up the statute behind anything it objects to. citation check -> BE-VRT BE-VRT-ALC-01 for obs_shot_8_002_v9e016d adjudicator 1 event 06:41:29.1
06:41:29.1
citation check -> BE-VRT BE-VRT-ALC-01 for obs_shot_8_002_v9e016d
Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. BE-VRT clearance recomputed -> blocked verifier 5 events 06:41:37.4
06:41:37.4
still open: BE-VRT-ALC-01 continues to fire at 35.08-42.08s; fnd_BE-VRT_BE-VRT-ALC-01_obs_shot_8_001_vc2e872 untouched
06:41:37.4
still open: BE-ALC-01 continues to fire at 35.08-42.08s; fnd_BE-VRT_BE-ALC-01_obs_shot_8_002_vc2e872 untouched
06:41:37.4
still open: BE-VRT-ALC-01 continues to fire at 35.08-42.08s; fnd_BE-VRT_BE-VRT-ALC-01_obs_shot_8_002_vc2e872 untouched
06:41:37.4
NOT fixed: EU-ALC-01 still fires at 35.08-42.08s after prop_swap; fnd_BE-VRT_EU-ALC-01_obs_shot_8_002_vc2e872 back to open
06:41:37.4
BE-VRT clearance recomputed -> blocked
Asking every market what it thinks One adjudicator per jurisdiction, all at once, each holding its own rulebook and looking up the statute behind anything it objects to. citation check -> SA SA-ALC-01 for obs_shot_9_000_v7d46c9 adjudicator 2 events 06:41:41.2
06:41:41.2
judge -> SA (5 candidates)
06:41:49.1
citation check -> SA SA-ALC-01 for obs_shot_9_000_v7d46c9
Fixing the shots that failed Working out the cheapest edit that would satisfy the rule, pricing it, and changing only the seconds that were objected to. snapshot store=True artifacts=9 remediator 1 event 06:41:50.3
06:41:50.3
snapshot store=True artifacts=9
Asking every market what it thinks One adjudicator per jurisdiction, all at once, each holding its own rulebook and looking up the statute behind anything it objects to. citation check -> SA SA-LGBT-01 for obs_shot_9_002_v7d46c9 adjudicator 2 events 06:41:54.7
06:41:54.7
citation check -> SA SA-ALC-01 for obs_shot_9_001_v7d46c9
06:41:59.8
citation check -> SA SA-LGBT-01 for obs_shot_9_002_v7d46c9
Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. SA clearance recomputed -> blocked verifier 3 events 06:42:06.6
06:42:06.6
still open: SA-LGBT-01 continues to fire at 42.08-49.12s; fnd_SA_SA-LGBT-01_obs_shot_9_002 untouched
06:42:06.6
NOT fixed: SA-ALC-01 still fires at 42.08-49.12s after prop_swap; fnd_SA_SA-ALC-01_obs_shot_9_000 back to open
06:42:06.6
SA clearance recomputed -> blocked
Fixing the shots that failed Working out the cheapest edit that would satisfy the rule, pricing it, and changing only the seconds that were objected to. prop_swap applied -> localized_SA.mp4 (chg_b66a740a1919); swapped the non-compliant prop for a Saudi Arabia-appropriate one remediator 7 events 06:42:07.2
06:42:07.2
SA-MOD-01 (SA) -> concept scope, running prop_swap anyway: The element runs through the whole scene, so a patch cannot reach it: the scene has to be regenerated with the permitted element in its place.
06:42:07.2
SA-MOD-01 (SA) -> planned prop_swap
06:42:07.2
prop_swap -> fnd_SA_SA-MOD-01_obs_shot_8_000 (SA-MOD-01, SA) on localized_SA.mp4 at 35.08-42.08s
06:42:09.0
snapshot store=True artifacts=1
06:42:42.5
prop_swap instruction: Edit this frame from a television commercial. Composite a fitted, high-neck athletic training t-shirt covering the woman's midriff and arms. Keep the lighting, the composition, the camera angle, the performers and every other pixel of the frame identical. Add nothing that is not already in the frame, and do not write any text into the picture. The market is Saudi Arabia.
06:42:51.3
craft gate passed: length 56.149s, 1347 frames, 48.2 dB outside the edit
06:42:51.8
prop_swap applied -> localized_SA.mp4 (chg_b66a740a1919); swapped the non-compliant prop for a Saudi Arabia-appropriate one
Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_SA.mp4 verifier 1 event 06:42:51.8
06:42:51.8
verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_SA.mp4
Writing down what is actually there Looking at every shot once and describing what it holds -- a glass, a hemline, a logo -- in neutral sentences, with no verdict attached. Every market will argue about these same sentences. observe -> shot_8 analyst 1 event 06:42:51.8
06:42:51.8
observe -> shot_8
Asking every market what it thinks One adjudicator per jurisdiction, all at once, each holding its own rulebook and looking up the statute behind anything it objects to. citation check -> SA SA-MOD-01 for obs_shot_8_000_vba2f9c adjudicator 2 events 06:42:57.4
06:42:57.4
judge -> SA (5 candidates)
06:43:11.2
citation check -> SA SA-MOD-01 for obs_shot_8_000_vba2f9c
Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. SA clearance recomputed -> blocked verifier 2 events 06:43:15.7
06:43:15.7
NOT fixed: SA-MOD-01 still fires at 35.08-42.08s after prop_swap; fnd_SA_SA-MOD-01_obs_shot_8_000 back to open
06:43:15.7
SA clearance recomputed -> blocked
Fixing the shots that failed Working out the cheapest edit that would satisfy the rule, pricing it, and changing only the seconds that were objected to. prop_swap applied -> localized_SA.mp4 (chg_276acc30857d); swapped the non-compliant prop for a Saudi Arabia-appropriate one remediator 7 events 06:43:16.3
06:43:16.3
SA-ALC-01 (SA) -> concept scope, running prop_swap anyway: The element runs through the whole scene, so a patch cannot reach it: the scene has to be regenerated with the permitted element in its place.
06:43:16.3
SA-ALC-01 (SA) -> planned prop_swap
06:43:16.3
prop_swap -> fnd_SA_SA-ALC-01_obs_shot_7_001 (SA-ALC-01, SA) on localized_SA.mp4 at 31.92-35.08s
06:43:29.0
snapshot store=True artifacts=7
06:43:58.7
prop_swap instruction: Edit this frame from a television commercial. Replace each alcoholic drink, bottle, glass, cigarette, cigar, tobacco pack or ashtray that is already visible with a permitted equivalent for Saudi Arabia -- tea in the same style of glass in place of a drink, a pen or nothing at all in place of a cigarette, a closed box with no branding in place of a pack -- keeping the same number of items in the same places and adding none. Keep the lighting, the composition, the camera angle, the hands and the people exactly as they are, and change nothing else in the frame. Do not add any new object anywhere in the frame, and do not put a replacement where there was nothing before: only what is already there may change.
06:44:07.6
craft gate passed: length 56.149s, 1347 frames, 48.7 dB outside the edit
06:44:08.0
prop_swap applied -> localized_SA.mp4 (chg_276acc30857d); swapped the non-compliant prop for a Saudi Arabia-appropriate one
Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_SA.mp4 verifier 1 event 06:44:08.0
06:44:08.0
verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_SA.mp4
Writing down what is actually there Looking at every shot once and describing what it holds -- a glass, a hemline, a logo -- in neutral sentences, with no verdict attached. Every market will argue about these same sentences. observe -> shot_7 analyst 1 event 06:44:08.0
06:44:08.0
observe -> shot_7
Asking every market what it thinks One adjudicator per jurisdiction, all at once, each holding its own rulebook and looking up the statute behind anything it objects to. citation check -> SA SA-ALC-01 for obs_shot_7_000_vb42af9 adjudicator 2 events 06:44:13.5
06:44:13.5
judge -> SA (2 candidates)
06:44:33.1
citation check -> SA SA-ALC-01 for obs_shot_7_000_vb42af9
Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. SA clearance recomputed -> blocked verifier 2 events 06:44:40.1
06:44:40.1
NOT fixed: SA-ALC-01 still fires at 31.92-35.08s after prop_swap; fnd_SA_SA-ALC-01_obs_shot_7_001 back to open
06:44:40.1
SA clearance recomputed -> blocked
Fixing the shots that failed Working out the cheapest edit that would satisfy the rule, pricing it, and changing only the seconds that were objected to. snapshot store=True artifacts=6 remediator 3 events 06:44:40.6
06:44:40.6
SA-LGBT-01 (SA) -> planned prop_swap
06:44:40.6
stage_error: remediate: fnd_SA_SA-LGBT-01_obs_shot_9_002: RemediationBlocked('fnd_SA_SA-LGBT-01_obs_shot_9_002 is blocked from auto-remediation: rule basis targets a protected characteristic; human decision required')
06:44:52.4
snapshot store=True artifacts=6
Getting everything ready Setting the run up and handing your commercial to the crew. add analysis -> 40 stored observation(s), no re-ingest, judging UK pipeline 2 events 06:48:49.7
06:48:49.7
retrying 1 market(s) that errored: UK
06:48:51.2
add analysis -> 40 stored observation(s), no re-ingest, judging UK
Asking every market what it thinks One adjudicator per jurisdiction, all at once, each holding its own rulebook and looking up the statute behind anything it objects to. UK clearance -> blocked (4 finding(s)) adjudicator 7 events 06:48:51.2
06:48:51.2
judge -> UK (43 candidates)
06:48:54.5
judge -> UK (43 candidates)
06:49:48.9
citation check -> UK UK-FLASH-01 for obs_flash_000
06:49:56.1
citation check -> UK GL-MISLEAD-01 for obs_shot_8_004
06:50:05.6
citation check -> UK UK-CMP-01 for obs_shot_8_004
06:50:10.5
citation check -> UK GL-HEALTH-01 for obs_shot_8_005
06:50:23.1
UK clearance -> blocked (4 finding(s))
Getting everything ready Setting the run up and handing your commercial to the crew. snapshot store=True artifacts=0 pipeline 1 event 06:50:38.4
06:50:38.4
snapshot store=True artifacts=0
Fixing the shots that failed Working out the cheapest edit that would satisfy the rule, pricing it, and changing only the seconds that were objected to. prop_swap applied -> localized_UK.mp4 (chg_cbe566610c25); swapped the non-compliant prop for a United Kingdom-appropriate one remediator 6 events 06:50:51.9
06:50:51.9
alert received: UK-FLASH-01 UK on test_ad -> fnd_UK_UK-FLASH-01_obs_flash_000
06:50:51.9
UK-FLASH-01 (UK) -> planned prop_swap
06:50:51.9
prop_swap -> fnd_UK_UK-FLASH-01_obs_flash_000 (UK-FLASH-01, UK) on test_ad.mp4 at 30.75-32.08s
06:51:36.7
prop_swap instruction: Edit this frame from a television commercial. Reduce the flash rate of the full-frame flashing sequence to below 3 flashes per second. Keep the lighting, the composition, the camera angle, the performers and every other pixel of the frame identical. Add nothing that is not already in the frame, and do not write any text into the picture. The market is United Kingdom.
06:51:45.8
craft gate passed: length 56.149s, 1347 frames, 47.4 dB outside the edit
06:51:46.1
prop_swap applied -> localized_UK.mp4 (chg_cbe566610c25); swapped the non-compliant prop for a United Kingdom-appropriate one
Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_UK.mp4 verifier 1 event 06:51:46.1
06:51:46.1
verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_UK.mp4
Writing down what is actually there Looking at every shot once and describing what it holds -- a glass, a hemline, a logo -- in neutral sentences, with no verdict attached. Every market will argue about these same sentences. observe -> shot_5 analyst 1 event 06:51:46.1
06:51:46.1
observe -> shot_5
Asking every market what it thinks One adjudicator per jurisdiction, all at once, each holding its own rulebook and looking up the statute behind anything it objects to. judge -> UK (0 candidates) adjudicator 1 event 06:51:50.3
06:51:50.3
judge -> UK (0 candidates)
Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_FR.mp4 verifier 5 events 06:51:50.3
06:51:50.3
fixed: UK-FLASH-01 no longer fires at 30.75-32.08s after prop_swap; fnd_UK_UK-FLASH-01_obs_flash_000 resolved
06:51:50.3
UK clearance recomputed -> at_risk
06:51:51.0
carrying prop_swap from UK into FR: 4 finding(s) on the same 30.75-32.08s (FR-ALC-01, FR-ALC-01, FR-ALC-01, FR-ALC-01), no generation
06:52:24.9
verify -> also ruling on 1 other open finding(s) in the same shot(s): FR-ALC-01
06:52:24.9
verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_FR.mp4
Writing down what is actually there Looking at every shot once and describing what it holds -- a glass, a hemline, a logo -- in neutral sentences, with no verdict attached. Every market will argue about these same sentences. observe -> shot_5 analyst 1 event 06:52:24.9
06:52:24.9
observe -> shot_5
Asking every market what it thinks One adjudicator per jurisdiction, all at once, each holding its own rulebook and looking up the statute behind anything it objects to. citation check -> FR FR-LANG-01 for obs_shot_5_000_vdb1b96 adjudicator 2 events 06:52:29.3
06:52:29.3
judge -> FR (1 candidates)
06:52:35.7
citation check -> FR FR-LANG-01 for obs_shot_5_000_vdb1b96
Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_AE.mp4 verifier 7 events 06:52:42.0
06:52:42.0
incidentally fixed: FR-ALC-01 no longer fires at 30.75-31.33s; fnd_FR_FR-ALC-01_obs_shot_5_001 resolved without having been the target
06:52:42.0
fixed: FR-ALC-01 no longer fires at 30.75-31.33s after carried over from UK; fnd_FR_FR-ALC-01_obs_shot_5_000 resolved
06:52:42.0
verification surfaced 1 new finding(s) in the edited shot(s): FR-LANG-01
06:52:42.0
FR clearance recomputed -> blocked
06:52:43.6
carrying prop_swap from UK into AE: 4 finding(s) on the same 30.75-32.08s (AE-ALC-01, AE-ALC-01, AE-ALC-01, AE-ALC-01), no generation
06:53:18.9
verify -> also ruling on 1 other open finding(s) in the same shot(s): AE-ALC-01
06:53:18.9
verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_AE.mp4
Writing down what is actually there Looking at every shot once and describing what it holds -- a glass, a hemline, a logo -- in neutral sentences, with no verdict attached. Every market will argue about these same sentences. observe -> shot_5 analyst 1 event 06:53:18.9
06:53:18.9
observe -> shot_5
Asking every market what it thinks One adjudicator per jurisdiction, all at once, each holding its own rulebook and looking up the statute behind anything it objects to. judge -> AE (0 candidates) adjudicator 1 event 06:53:22.3
06:53:22.3
judge -> AE (0 candidates)
Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_BE-VRT.mp4 verifier 7 events 06:53:22.3
06:53:22.3
incidentally fixed: AE-ALC-01 no longer fires at 30.75-31.33s; fnd_AE_AE-ALC-01_obs_shot_5_001 resolved without having been the target
06:53:22.3
fixed: AE-ALC-01 no longer fires at 30.75-31.33s after carried over from UK; fnd_AE_AE-ALC-01_obs_shot_5_000 resolved
06:53:22.3
AE clearance recomputed -> blocked
06:53:23.0
SA objects to the same 30.75-32.08s, but has already edited that span for itself; leaving its cut alone
06:53:23.0
carrying prop_swap from UK into BE-VRT: 8 finding(s) on the same 30.75-32.08s (BE-ALC-01, BE-VRT-ALC-01, BE-ALC-01, BE-VRT-ALC-01, BE-ALC-01, BE-VRT-ALC-01, BE-ALC-01, BE-VRT-ALC-01), no generation
06:53:58.5
verify -> also ruling on 3 other open finding(s) in the same shot(s): BE-VRT-ALC-01, BE-ALC-01, BE-VRT-ALC-01
06:53:58.5
verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_BE-VRT.mp4
Writing down what is actually there Looking at every shot once and describing what it holds -- a glass, a hemline, a logo -- in neutral sentences, with no verdict attached. Every market will argue about these same sentences. observe -> shot_5 analyst 1 event 06:53:58.5
06:53:58.5
observe -> shot_5
Asking every market what it thinks One adjudicator per jurisdiction, all at once, each holding its own rulebook and looking up the statute behind anything it objects to. citation check -> BE-VRT BE-LANG-01 for obs_shot_5_000_v3e32d8 adjudicator 2 events 06:54:02.7
06:54:02.7
judge -> BE-VRT (1 candidates)
06:54:08.8
citation check -> BE-VRT BE-LANG-01 for obs_shot_5_000_v3e32d8
Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. BE-VRT clearance recomputed -> blocked verifier 6 events 06:54:20.5
06:54:20.5
incidentally fixed: BE-VRT-ALC-01 no longer fires at 30.75-31.33s; fnd_BE-VRT_BE-VRT-ALC-01_obs_shot_5_000 resolved without having been the target
06:54:20.5
incidentally fixed: BE-ALC-01 no longer fires at 30.75-31.33s; fnd_BE-VRT_BE-ALC-01_obs_shot_5_001 resolved without having been the target
06:54:20.5
incidentally fixed: BE-VRT-ALC-01 no longer fires at 30.75-31.33s; fnd_BE-VRT_BE-VRT-ALC-01_obs_shot_5_001 resolved without having been the target
06:54:20.5
fixed: BE-ALC-01 no longer fires at 30.75-31.33s after carried over from UK; fnd_BE-VRT_BE-ALC-01_obs_shot_5_000 resolved
06:54:20.5
verification surfaced 1 new finding(s) in the edited shot(s): BE-LANG-01
06:54:20.5
BE-VRT clearance recomputed -> blocked
Fixing the shots that failed Working out the cheapest edit that would satisfy the rule, pricing it, and changing only the seconds that were objected to. prop_swap applied -> localized_FR.mp4 (chg_541cfcf45953); swapped the non-compliant prop for a France-appropriate one remediator 14 events 06:54:21.1
06:54:21.1
alert received: AE-ALC-01 AE on test_ad -> fnd_AE_AE-ALC-01_obs_shot_9_000
06:54:21.1
alert received: AE-MOD-01 AE on test_ad -> fnd_AE_AE-MOD-01_obs_shot_8_000
06:54:21.1
alert received: AE-LGBT-01 AE on test_ad -> fnd_AE_AE-LGBT-01_obs_shot_9_002
06:54:21.1
alert received: FR-ALC-01 FR on test_ad -> fnd_FR_FR-ALC-01_obs_shot_9_000
06:54:21.1
AE-ALC-01 (AE) -> concept scope, running prop_swap anyway: The element runs through the whole scene, so a patch cannot reach it: the scene has to be regenerated with the permitted element in its place.
06:54:21.1
AE-ALC-01 (AE) -> planned prop_swap
06:54:21.1
prop_swap -> fnd_AE_AE-ALC-01_obs_shot_9_000 (AE-ALC-01, AE) on localized_AE.mp4 at 42.08-49.12s
06:54:21.1
FR-ALC-01 (FR) -> concept scope, running prop_swap anyway: The element runs through the whole scene, so a patch cannot reach it: the scene has to be regenerated with the permitted element in its place.
06:54:21.1
FR-ALC-01 (FR) -> planned prop_swap
06:54:21.1
prop_swap -> fnd_FR_FR-ALC-01_obs_shot_9_000 (FR-ALC-01, FR) on localized_FR.mp4 at 42.08-49.12s
06:54:44.2
snapshot store=True artifacts=22
06:55:01.8
prop_swap instruction: Edit this frame from a television commercial. Replace each alcoholic drink, bottle, glass, cigarette, cigar, tobacco pack or ashtray that is already visible with a permitted equivalent for France -- tea in the same style of glass in place of a drink, a pen or nothing at all in place of a cigarette, a closed box with no branding in place of a pack -- keeping the same number of items in the same places and adding none. Keep the lighting, the composition, the camera angle, the hands and the people exactly as they are, and change nothing else in the frame. Do not add any new object anywhere in the frame, and do not put a replacement where there was nothing before: only what is already there may change.
06:55:14.2
craft gate passed: length 56.149s, 1347 frames, 49.0 dB outside the edit
06:55:15.9
prop_swap applied -> localized_FR.mp4 (chg_541cfcf45953); swapped the non-compliant prop for a France-appropriate one
Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_FR.mp4 verifier 1 event 06:55:15.9
06:55:15.9
verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_FR.mp4
Writing down what is actually there Looking at every shot once and describing what it holds -- a glass, a hemline, a logo -- in neutral sentences, with no verdict attached. Every market will argue about these same sentences. observe -> shot_9 analyst 1 event 06:55:15.9
06:55:15.9
observe -> shot_9
Asking every market what it thinks One adjudicator per jurisdiction, all at once, each holding its own rulebook and looking up the statute behind anything it objects to. citation check -> FR FR-ALC-01 for obs_shot_9_000_v6ea184 adjudicator 2 events 06:55:27.8
06:55:27.8
judge -> FR (8 candidates)
06:55:37.6
citation check -> FR FR-ALC-01 for obs_shot_9_000_v6ea184
Fixing the shots that failed Working out the cheapest edit that would satisfy the rule, pricing it, and changing only the seconds that were objected to. prop_swap instruction: Edit this frame from a television commercial. Replace each alcoholic drink, bottle, glass, cigarette, cigar, tobacco pack or ashtray that is already visible with a permitted equivalent for United Arab Emirates -- tea in the same style of glass in place of a drink, a pen or nothing at all in place of a cigarette, a closed box with no branding in place of a pack -- keeping the same number of items in the same places and adding none. Keep the lighting, the composition, the camera angle, the hands and the people exactly as they are, and change nothing else in the frame. Do not add any new object anywhere in the frame, and do not put a replacement where there was nothing before: only what is already there may change. remediator 1 event 06:55:38.8
06:55:38.8
prop_swap instruction: Edit this frame from a television commercial. Replace each alcoholic drink, bottle, glass, cigarette, cigar, tobacco pack or ashtray that is already visible with a permitted equivalent for United Arab Emirates -- tea in the same style of glass in place of a drink, a pen or nothing at all in place of a cigarette, a closed box with no branding in place of a pack -- keeping the same number of items in the same places and adding none. Keep the lighting, the composition, the camera angle, the hands and the people exactly as they are, and change nothing else in the frame. Do not add any new object anywhere in the frame, and do not put a replacement where there was nothing before: only what is already there may change.
Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. FR clearance recomputed -> blocked verifier 2 events 06:55:44.4
06:55:44.4
NOT fixed: FR-ALC-01 still fires at 42.08-49.12s after prop_swap; fnd_FR_FR-ALC-01_obs_shot_9_000 back to open
06:55:44.4
FR clearance recomputed -> blocked
Fixing the shots that failed Working out the cheapest edit that would satisfy the rule, pricing it, and changing only the seconds that were objected to. prop_swap applied -> localized_AE.mp4 (chg_6f77659f5f64); swapped the non-compliant prop for a United Arab Emirates-appropriate one remediator 2 events 06:55:48.5
06:55:48.5
craft gate passed: length 56.149s, 1347 frames, 49.0 dB outside the edit
06:55:49.1
prop_swap applied -> localized_AE.mp4 (chg_6f77659f5f64); swapped the non-compliant prop for a United Arab Emirates-appropriate one
Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_AE.mp4 verifier 2 events 06:55:49.1
06:55:49.1
verify -> also ruling on 1 other open finding(s) in the same shot(s): AE-LGBT-01
06:55:49.1
verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_AE.mp4
Writing down what is actually there Looking at every shot once and describing what it holds -- a glass, a hemline, a logo -- in neutral sentences, with no verdict attached. Every market will argue about these same sentences. observe -> shot_9 analyst 1 event 06:55:49.1
06:55:49.1
observe -> shot_9
Fixing the shots that failed Working out the cheapest edit that would satisfy the rule, pricing it, and changing only the seconds that were objected to. one edit for 4 findings on this shot: EU-ALC-01 plus BE-VRT-ALC-01, BE-ALC-01, BE-VRT-ALC-01 remediator 4 events 06:55:51.9
06:55:51.9
alert received: EU-ALC-01 BE-VRT on test_ad -> fnd_BE-VRT_EU-ALC-01_obs_shot_8_002_vc2e872
06:55:51.9
EU-ALC-01 (BE-VRT) -> planned prop_swap
06:55:51.9
prop_swap -> fnd_BE-VRT_EU-ALC-01_obs_shot_8_002_vc2e872 (EU-ALC-01, BE-VRT) on localized_BE-VRT.mp4 at 35.08-42.08s
06:55:51.9
one edit for 4 findings on this shot: EU-ALC-01 plus BE-VRT-ALC-01, BE-ALC-01, BE-VRT-ALC-01
Asking every market what it thinks One adjudicator per jurisdiction, all at once, each holding its own rulebook and looking up the statute behind anything it objects to. judge -> AE (4 candidates) adjudicator 1 event 06:55:57.6
06:55:57.6
judge -> AE (4 candidates)
Fixing the shots that failed Working out the cheapest edit that would satisfy the rule, pricing it, and changing only the seconds that were objected to. snapshot store=True artifacts=9 remediator 1 event 06:55:59.6
06:55:59.6
snapshot store=True artifacts=9
Asking every market what it thinks One adjudicator per jurisdiction, all at once, each holding its own rulebook and looking up the statute behind anything it objects to. citation check -> AE AE-LGBT-01 for obs_shot_9_003_vf3a38d adjudicator 3 events 06:56:08.9
06:56:08.9
citation check -> AE AE-ALC-01 for obs_shot_9_000_vf3a38d
06:56:14.0
folded a second AE-ALC-01 on the same span for AE (obs_shot_9_001_vf3a38d after obs_shot_9_000_vf3a38d)
06:56:14.0
citation check -> AE AE-LGBT-01 for obs_shot_9_003_vf3a38d
Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. AE clearance recomputed -> blocked verifier 3 events 06:56:21.0
06:56:21.0
still open: AE-LGBT-01 continues to fire at 42.08-49.12s; fnd_AE_AE-LGBT-01_obs_shot_9_002 untouched
06:56:21.0
NOT fixed: AE-ALC-01 still fires at 42.08-49.12s after prop_swap; fnd_AE_AE-ALC-01_obs_shot_9_000 back to open
06:56:21.0
AE clearance recomputed -> blocked
Fixing the shots that failed Working out the cheapest edit that would satisfy the rule, pricing it, and changing only the seconds that were objected to. prop_swap applied -> localized_BE-VRT.mp4 (chg_7e79ec2a66d4); swapped the non-compliant prop for a VRT (Belgium, Flanders)-appropriate one remediator 7 events 06:56:21.6
06:56:21.6
AE-MOD-01 (AE) -> concept scope, running prop_swap anyway: The element runs through the whole scene, so a patch cannot reach it: the scene has to be regenerated with the permitted element in its place.
06:56:21.6
AE-MOD-01 (AE) -> planned prop_swap
06:56:21.6
prop_swap -> fnd_AE_AE-MOD-01_obs_shot_8_000 (AE-MOD-01, AE) on localized_AE.mp4 at 35.08-42.08s
06:56:30.0
prop_swap instruction: Edit this frame from a television commercial. Replace each alcoholic drink, bottle, glass, cigarette, cigar, tobacco pack or ashtray that is already visible with a permitted equivalent for VRT (Belgium, Flanders) -- tea in the same style of glass in place of a drink, a pen or nothing at all in place of a cigarette, a closed box with no branding in place of a pack -- keeping the same number of items in the same places and adding none. Keep the lighting, the composition, the camera angle, the hands and the people exactly as they are, and change nothing else in the frame. Do not add any new object anywhere in the frame, and do not put a replacement where there was nothing before: only what is already there may change.
06:56:30.3
snapshot store=True artifacts=6
06:56:39.3
craft gate passed: length 56.149s, 1347 frames, 48.6 dB outside the edit
06:56:39.9
prop_swap applied -> localized_BE-VRT.mp4 (chg_7e79ec2a66d4); swapped the non-compliant prop for a VRT (Belgium, Flanders)-appropriate one
Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_BE-VRT.mp4 verifier 2 events 06:56:39.9
06:56:39.9
verify -> also ruling on 3 other open finding(s) in the same shot(s): BE-VRT-ALC-01, BE-ALC-01, BE-VRT-ALC-01
06:56:39.9
verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_BE-VRT.mp4
Writing down what is actually there Looking at every shot once and describing what it holds -- a glass, a hemline, a logo -- in neutral sentences, with no verdict attached. Every market will argue about these same sentences. observe -> shot_8 analyst 1 event 06:56:39.9
06:56:39.9
observe -> shot_8
Asking every market what it thinks One adjudicator per jurisdiction, all at once, each holding its own rulebook and looking up the statute behind anything it objects to. judge -> BE-VRT (8 candidates) adjudicator 1 event 06:56:49.6
06:56:49.6
judge -> BE-VRT (8 candidates)
Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. carrying prop_swap from BE-VRT into UK: 3 finding(s) on the same 35.08-42.08s (GL-MISLEAD-01, UK-CMP-01, GL-HEALTH-01), no generation verifier 6 events 06:57:06.7
06:57:06.7
incidentally fixed: BE-VRT-ALC-01 no longer fires at 35.08-42.08s; fnd_BE-VRT_BE-VRT-ALC-01_obs_shot_8_001_vc2e872 resolved without having been the target
06:57:06.7
incidentally fixed: BE-ALC-01 no longer fires at 35.08-42.08s; fnd_BE-VRT_BE-ALC-01_obs_shot_8_002_vc2e872 resolved without having been the target
06:57:06.7
incidentally fixed: BE-VRT-ALC-01 no longer fires at 35.08-42.08s; fnd_BE-VRT_BE-VRT-ALC-01_obs_shot_8_002_vc2e872 resolved without having been the target
06:57:06.7
fixed: EU-ALC-01 no longer fires at 35.08-42.08s after prop_swap; fnd_BE-VRT_EU-ALC-01_obs_shot_8_002_vc2e872 resolved
06:57:06.7
BE-VRT clearance recomputed -> at_risk
06:57:07.7
carrying prop_swap from BE-VRT into UK: 3 finding(s) on the same 35.08-42.08s (GL-MISLEAD-01, UK-CMP-01, GL-HEALTH-01), no generation
Fixing the shots that failed Working out the cheapest edit that would satisfy the rule, pricing it, and changing only the seconds that were objected to. prop_swap applied -> localized_AE.mp4 (chg_2162ee28a045); swapped the non-compliant prop for a United Arab Emirates-appropriate one remediator 3 events 06:57:08.5
06:57:08.5
prop_swap instruction: Edit this frame from a television commercial. Extend the black sports bra into a full-length athletic tank top covering the midriff. Keep the lighting, the composition, the camera angle, the performers and every other pixel of the frame identical. Add nothing that is not already in the frame, and do not write any text into the picture. The market is United Arab Emirates.
06:57:28.5
craft gate passed: length 56.149s, 1347 frames, 49.3 dB outside the edit
06:57:30.1
prop_swap applied -> localized_AE.mp4 (chg_2162ee28a045); swapped the non-compliant prop for a United Arab Emirates-appropriate one
Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_AE.mp4 verifier 1 event 06:57:30.2
06:57:30.2
verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_AE.mp4
Writing down what is actually there Looking at every shot once and describing what it holds -- a glass, a hemline, a logo -- in neutral sentences, with no verdict attached. Every market will argue about these same sentences. observe -> shot_8 analyst 1 event 06:57:30.2
06:57:30.2
observe -> shot_8
Asking every market what it thinks One adjudicator per jurisdiction, all at once, each holding its own rulebook and looking up the statute behind anything it objects to. judge -> AE (3 candidates) adjudicator 1 event 06:57:40.0
06:57:40.0
judge -> AE (3 candidates)
Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_UK.mp4 verifier 2 events 06:57:58.4
06:57:58.4
verify -> also ruling on 2 other open finding(s) in the same shot(s): UK-CMP-01, GL-HEALTH-01
06:57:58.4
verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_UK.mp4
Writing down what is actually there Looking at every shot once and describing what it holds -- a glass, a hemline, a logo -- in neutral sentences, with no verdict attached. Every market will argue about these same sentences. observe -> shot_8 analyst 1 event 06:57:58.4
06:57:58.4
observe -> shot_8
Asking every market what it thinks One adjudicator per jurisdiction, all at once, each holding its own rulebook and looking up the statute behind anything it objects to. judge -> UK (4 candidates) adjudicator 2 events 06:58:03.4
06:58:03.4
citation check -> AE AE-MOD-01 for obs_shot_8_000_va98ef6
06:58:05.5
judge -> UK (4 candidates)
Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. AE clearance recomputed -> blocked verifier 2 events 06:58:08.6
06:58:08.6
NOT fixed: AE-MOD-01 still fires at 35.08-42.08s after prop_swap; fnd_AE_AE-MOD-01_obs_shot_8_000 back to open
06:58:08.6
AE clearance recomputed -> blocked
Fixing the shots that failed Working out the cheapest edit that would satisfy the rule, pricing it, and changing only the seconds that were objected to. stage_error: remediate: fnd_AE_AE-LGBT-01_obs_shot_9_002: RemediationBlocked('fnd_AE_AE-LGBT-01_obs_shot_9_002 is blocked from auto-remediation: rule basis targets a protected characteristic; human decision required') remediator 2 events 06:58:09.2
06:58:09.2
AE-LGBT-01 (AE) -> planned prop_swap
06:58:09.2
stage_error: remediate: fnd_AE_AE-LGBT-01_obs_shot_9_002: RemediationBlocked('fnd_AE_AE-LGBT-01_obs_shot_9_002 is blocked from auto-remediation: rule basis targets a protected characteristic; human decision required')
Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. SA objects to the same 35.08-42.08s, but has already edited that span for itself; leaving its cut alone verifier 6 events 06:58:14.0
06:58:14.0
incidentally fixed: UK-CMP-01 no longer fires at 35.08-42.08s; fnd_UK_UK-CMP-01_obs_shot_8_004 resolved without having been the target
06:58:14.0
incidentally fixed: GL-HEALTH-01 no longer fires at 35.08-42.08s; fnd_UK_GL-HEALTH-01_obs_shot_8_005 resolved without having been the target
06:58:14.0
fixed: GL-MISLEAD-01 no longer fires at 35.08-42.08s after carried over from BE-VRT; fnd_UK_GL-MISLEAD-01_obs_shot_8_004 resolved
06:58:14.0
UK clearance recomputed -> cleared
06:58:14.7
AE objects to the same 35.08-42.08s, but has already edited that span for itself; leaving its cut alone
06:58:14.7
SA objects to the same 35.08-42.08s, but has already edited that span for itself; leaving its cut alone
Fixing the shots that failed Working out the cheapest edit that would satisfy the rule, pricing it, and changing only the seconds that were objected to. stage_error: remediate: the service restarted while fnd_BE-VRT_BE-VRT-ALC-01_obs_shot_7_001 was being remediated; finding back to open remediator 10 events 06:58:23.8
06:58:23.8
snapshot store=True artifacts=11
06:58:25.6
snapshot store=True artifacts=0
11:21:22.8
stage_error: remediate: the service restarted while fnd_FR_FR-ALC-01_obs_shot_6_001 was being remediated; finding back to open
11:21:22.8
stage_error: remediate: the service restarted while fnd_FR_FR-ALC-01_obs_shot_7_001 was being remediated; finding back to open
11:21:22.8
stage_error: remediate: the service restarted while fnd_AE_AE-ALC-01_obs_shot_6_001 was being remediated; finding back to open
11:21:22.8
stage_error: remediate: the service restarted while fnd_AE_AE-ALC-01_obs_shot_7_001 was being remediated; finding back to open
11:21:22.8
stage_error: remediate: the service restarted while fnd_BE-VRT_BE-ALC-01_obs_shot_6_001 was being remediated; finding back to open
11:21:22.8
stage_error: remediate: the service restarted while fnd_BE-VRT_BE-VRT-ALC-01_obs_shot_6_001 was being remediated; finding back to open
11:21:22.8
stage_error: remediate: the service restarted while fnd_BE-VRT_BE-ALC-01_obs_shot_7_001 was being remediated; finding back to open
11:21:22.8
stage_error: remediate: the service restarted while fnd_BE-VRT_BE-VRT-ALC-01_obs_shot_7_001 was being remediated; finding back to open
Working The crew is busy on this run. edit deleted: chg_6f77659f5f64 and 7 file(s) operator 24 events 14:03:06.8
14:03:06.8
edit deleted: chg_cbe566610c25 and 5 file(s)
14:03:08.9
snapshot store=True artifacts=0
14:03:13.7
edit deleted: chg_0f7138d4b6f2 and 4 file(s)
14:03:15.9
snapshot store=True artifacts=0
14:03:30.3
edit deleted: chg_276acc30857d and 5 file(s)
14:03:42.2
snapshot store=True artifacts=0
14:03:50.2
edit deleted: chg_29659bba700b and 4 file(s)
14:03:52.5
snapshot store=True artifacts=0
14:04:00.5
edit deleted: chg_7935aad72d97 and 5 file(s)
14:17:01.1
edit deleted: chg_a75f81d789db and 2 file(s)
14:17:03.0
snapshot store=True artifacts=0
14:46:49.1
edit deleted: chg_d9ab8e9dc5c7 and 6 file(s)
14:46:50.7
snapshot store=True artifacts=0
15:35:19.3
edit deleted: chg_18ad1f770b2a and 4 file(s)
15:35:33.7
snapshot store=True artifacts=3
16:58:50.0
edit deleted: chg_037d67ac4690 and 4 file(s)
16:58:59.9
edit deleted: chg_09bc2eefb74c and 7 file(s)
16:59:06.4
snapshot store=True artifacts=20
16:59:10.3
snapshot store=True artifacts=0
17:17:43.6
edit deleted: chg_81aaee9ec4fc and 7 file(s)
17:17:48.2
snapshot store=True artifacts=1
17:17:50.7
edit deleted: chg_541cfcf45953 and 7 file(s)
17:17:55.7
snapshot store=True artifacts=0
17:26:42.5
edit deleted: chg_6f77659f5f64 and 7 file(s)