THE MEDIA CUSTOMS LAUNCH CONTROL Google Cloud Agent Builder Powered by Grafana
Home Agent Studio
Mission feed

Mission feed

Every move the crew made, in the order it made it. Not a spinner. This is the crew's own event log, streamed over server-sent events straight out of the run store. Stage errors are in here too, because a clearance tool that silently skips a shot is worse than one that admits it.

Stream connecting 83 events
Getting everything ready Setting the run up and handing your commercial to the crew. ingest -> detecting shots pipeline 3 events 15:44:10.7
15:44:10.7 console accepted A_Little_Kindness_in_the_Drive_Thru.mp4 (15.1s) for AE, CA-QC, CN, SA, UK, BE
15:44:17.3 run run_cb870548494b started: asset=runs/uploads/936e375cdd79/A_Little_Kindness_in_the_Drive_Thru.mp4 markets=['AE', 'CA-QC', 'CN', 'SA', 'UK', 'BE']
15:44:25.7 ingest -> detecting shots
Watching the film for the first time Cutting your commercial into its own shots, listening to the soundtrack, and measuring the picture for flashing that could trouble a photosensitive viewer. found 8 cut(s) in 15.1s of film ingest 2 events 15:44:25.7
15:44:25.7 watching the film end to end, hunting for the cuts
15:44:33.9 found 8 cut(s) in 15.1s of film
Getting everything ready Setting the run up and handing your commercial to the crew. ingest -> 8 raw shot(s) merged to 8 pipeline 1 event 15:44:33.9
15:44:33.9 ingest -> 8 raw shot(s) merged to 8
Watching the film for the first time Cutting your commercial into its own shots, listening to the soundtrack, and measuring the picture for flashing that could trouble a photosensitive viewer. 8 shot(s) to read, one at a time, no skimming ingest 1 event 15:44:33.9
15:44:33.9 8 shot(s) to read, one at a time, no skimming
Listening to what is said Writing down the words in each shot, so a claim that is only spoken is caught as surely as one on screen. shot_7 -> 41 char(s) transcription 16 events 15:44:33.9
15:44:33.9 listening to shot_0 (1/8), 2.3s of audio
15:44:39.7 shot_0 -> 33 char(s)
15:44:39.7 listening to shot_1 (2/8), 1.0s of audio
15:44:44.2 shot_1 -> 13 char(s)
15:44:44.2 listening to shot_2 (3/8), 1.6s of audio
15:44:48.5 shot_2 -> 26 char(s)
15:44:48.5 listening to shot_3 (4/8), 3.2s of audio
15:44:51.9 shot_3 -> 41 char(s)
15:44:51.9 listening to shot_4 (5/8), 1.0s of audio
15:44:55.3 shot_4 -> 19 char(s)
15:44:55.3 listening to shot_5 (6/8), 1.3s of audio
15:44:57.7 shot_5 -> 15 char(s)
15:44:57.7 listening to shot_6 (7/8), 2.1s of audio
15:45:01.1 shot_6 -> 23 char(s)
15:45:01.1 listening to shot_7 (8/8), 2.6s of audio
15:45:03.5 shot_7 -> 41 char(s)
Writing down what is actually there Looking at every shot once and describing what it holds -- a glass, a hemline, a logo -- in neutral sentences, with no verdict attached. Every market will argue about these same sentences. shot_7 -> noted 3 thing(s) worth writing down analyst 24 events 15:45:07.5
15:45:07.5 looking at shot_0 (1/8) with no idea which country will object
15:45:07.5 observe -> shot_0
15:45:11.9 shot_0 -> noted 4 thing(s) worth writing down
15:45:11.9 reading shot_1 (2/8) the way a regulator would, ruleless for now
15:45:11.9 observe -> shot_1
15:45:19.9 shot_1 -> noted 2 thing(s) worth writing down
15:45:19.9 describing shot_2 (3/8) in plain words, no verdicts yet
15:45:19.9 observe -> shot_2
15:45:25.6 shot_2 -> noted 3 thing(s) worth writing down
15:45:25.6 shot_3 (4/8): what is on screen, not what it means
15:45:25.6 observe -> shot_3
15:45:30.1 shot_3 -> noted 2 thing(s) worth writing down
15:45:30.1 watching shot_4 (5/8) for the thing eleven markets disagree about
15:45:30.1 observe -> shot_4
15:45:37.6 shot_4 -> noted 3 thing(s) worth writing down
15:45:37.6 taking shot_5 (6/8) apart, one observation at a time
15:45:37.6 observe -> shot_5
15:45:42.2 shot_5 -> noted 3 thing(s) worth writing down
15:45:42.2 looking at shot_6 (7/8) with no idea which country will object
15:45:42.2 observe -> shot_6
15:45:59.5 shot_6 -> noted 4 thing(s) worth writing down
15:45:59.5 reading shot_7 (8/8) the way a regulator would, ruleless for now
15:45:59.5 observe -> shot_7
15:46:07.1 shot_7 -> noted 3 thing(s) worth writing down
Getting everything ready Setting the run up and handing your commercial to the crew. analyst -> 24 observation(s) persisted pipeline 1 event 15:46:07.1
15:46:07.1 analyst -> 24 observation(s) persisted
Asking every market what it thinks One adjudicator per jurisdiction, all at once, each holding its own rulebook and looking up the statute behind anything it objects to. BE clearance -> cleared (0 finding(s)) adjudicator 14 events 15:46:08.4
15:46:08.4 judge -> AE (13 candidates)
15:46:08.6 judge -> UK (7 candidates)
15:46:08.7 judge -> SA (9 candidates)
15:46:08.7 judge -> CN (5 candidates)
15:46:08.7 judge -> CA-QC (10 candidates)
15:46:08.7 judge -> BE (16 candidates)
15:46:33.9 citation check -> CA-QC CA-QC-LANG-01 for obs_shot_6_001
15:46:50.8 citation check -> CA-QC CA-QC-LANG-01 for obs_shot_6_002
15:47:08.6 AE clearance -> cleared (0 finding(s))
15:47:08.6 CA-QC clearance -> cleared (2 finding(s))
15:47:08.6 CN clearance -> cleared (0 finding(s))
15:47:08.6 SA clearance -> cleared (0 finding(s))
15:47:08.6 UK clearance -> cleared (0 finding(s))
15:47:08.6 BE clearance -> cleared (0 finding(s))
Getting everything ready Setting the run up and handing your commercial to the crew. adjudicate -> 2 finding(s) persisted across 6 market(s) pipeline 1 event 15:47:08.6
15:47:08.6 adjudicate -> 2 finding(s) persisted across 6 market(s)
Putting it all into Grafana Calling Grafana and making sure everything lands there: the numbers, the finding detail, the dashboards to read them on and the alerts that will wake the crew if something needs fixing. mcp update_dashboard('customs-overview', replace $.description) publisher 6 events 15:47:08.6
15:47:08.6 publisher -> connecting to Grafana
15:47:19.3 push_run_telemetry -> {'run_id': 'run_cb870548494b', 'markets': ['AE', 'CA-QC', 'CN', 'SA', 'UK', 'BE'], 'clearances': {'AE': 'cleared', 'CA-QC': 'cleared', 'CN': 'cleared', 'SA': 'cleared', 'UK': 'cleared', 'BE': 'cleared'}, 'risk_samples': '6 market(s) x 15s', 'logs': 2, 'annotations_created': 2, 'annotations_skipped_as_duplicates': 0, 'failed_stages': []}
15:47:22.1 ensure_dashboards -> ['customs-findings', 'customs-history', 'customs-market', 'customs-overview', 'customs-remediation', 'customs-timeline']
15:47:23.5 mcp search_dashboards('customs')
15:47:25.2 mcp get_dashboard_by_uid('customs-overview')
15:47:29.4 mcp update_dashboard('customs-overview', replace $.description)
Getting everything ready Setting the run up and handing your commercial to the crew. snapshot store=True artifacts=20 pipeline 2 events 15:47:32.1
15:47:32.1 run run_cb870548494b done
15:47:38.4 snapshot store=True artifacts=20
Fixing the shots that failed Working out the cheapest edit that would satisfy the rule, pricing it, and changing only the seconds that were objected to. bridge applied -> localized_CA-QC.mp4 (chg_2c723925d6da); regenerated 4s of motion between two edited anchor frames remediator 6 events 15:47:48.3
15:47:48.3 console requested remediation: CA-QC-LANG-01 (CA-QC) -> fnd_CA-QC_CA-QC-LANG-01_obs_shot_6_001 [bridge, 1.88 EUR, remedy:0]
15:47:48.3 CA-QC-LANG-01 (CA-QC) -> planned bridge
15:47:48.3 bridge -> fnd_CA-QC_CA-QC-LANG-01_obs_shot_6_001 (CA-QC-LANG-01, CA-QC) on A_Little_Kindness_in_the_Drive_Thru.mp4 at 10.38-12.51s
15:48:13.0 bridge head: checked, compliant
15:48:34.4 bridge tail: checked, compliant
15:49:26.5 bridge applied -> localized_CA-QC.mp4 (chg_2c723925d6da); regenerated 4s of motion between two edited anchor frames
Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_CA-QC.mp4 verifier 1 event 15:49:26.5
15:49:26.5 verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_CA-QC.mp4
Writing down what is actually there Looking at every shot once and describing what it holds -- a glass, a hemline, a logo -- in neutral sentences, with no verdict attached. Every market will argue about these same sentences. observe -> shot_6 analyst 1 event 15:49:26.5
15:49:26.5 observe -> shot_6
Asking every market what it thinks One adjudicator per jurisdiction, all at once, each holding its own rulebook and looking up the statute behind anything it objects to. judge -> CA-QC (2 candidates) adjudicator 1 event 15:49:33.6
15:49:33.6 judge -> CA-QC (2 candidates)
Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. CA-QC clearance recomputed -> cleared verifier 2 events 15:49:47.4
15:49:47.4 fixed: CA-QC-LANG-01 no longer fires at 10.38-12.51s after bridge; fnd_CA-QC_CA-QC-LANG-01_obs_shot_6_001 resolved
15:49:47.4 CA-QC clearance recomputed -> cleared
Fixing the shots that failed Working out the cheapest edit that would satisfy the rule, pricing it, and changing only the seconds that were objected to. snapshot store=True artifacts=8 remediator 1 event 15:49:52.7
15:49:52.7 snapshot store=True artifacts=8