THE MEDIA CUSTOMS LAUNCH CONTROL Google Cloud Agent Builder Powered by Grafana
Home Agent Studio
Mission feed

Mission feed

Every move the crew made, in the order it made it. Not a spinner. This is the crew's own event log, streamed over server-sent events straight out of the run store. Stage errors are in here too, because a clearance tool that silently skips a shot is worse than one that admits it.

Stream connecting 116 events
Getting everything ready Setting the run up and handing your commercial to the crew. ingest -> detecting shots pipeline 3 events 10:20:51.8
10:20:51.8 console accepted On_the_trail_of_COCO_MADEMOISELLE.mp4 (15.1s) for AE, SA, TH
10:20:53.8 run run_c61fa291681f started: asset=runs/uploads/9e1db0f35191/On_the_trail_of_COCO_MADEMOISELLE.mp4 markets=['AE', 'SA', 'TH']
10:20:55.0 ingest -> detecting shots
Watching the film for the first time Cutting your commercial into its own shots, listening to the soundtrack, and measuring the picture for flashing that could trouble a photosensitive viewer. found 3 cut(s) in 15.1s of film ingest 2 events 10:20:55.0
10:20:55.0 watching the film end to end, hunting for the cuts
10:20:55.9 found 3 cut(s) in 15.1s of film
Getting everything ready Setting the run up and handing your commercial to the crew. ingest -> 3 raw shot(s) merged to 3 pipeline 1 event 10:20:55.9
10:20:55.9 ingest -> 3 raw shot(s) merged to 3
Watching the film for the first time Cutting your commercial into its own shots, listening to the soundtrack, and measuring the picture for flashing that could trouble a photosensitive viewer. 3 shot(s) to read, one at a time, no skimming ingest 1 event 10:20:55.9
10:20:55.9 3 shot(s) to read, one at a time, no skimming
Listening to what is said Writing down the words in each shot, so a claim that is only spoken is caught as surely as one on screen. shot_2 -> 24 char(s) transcription 6 events 10:20:55.9
10:20:55.9 listening to shot_0 (1/3), 4.4s of audio
10:20:58.2 shot_0 -> said nothing at all
10:20:58.2 listening to shot_1 (2/3), 7.6s of audio
10:21:01.1 shot_1 -> said nothing at all
10:21:01.1 listening to shot_2 (3/3), 3.1s of audio
10:21:03.7 shot_2 -> 24 char(s)
Writing down what is actually there Looking at every shot once and describing what it holds -- a glass, a hemline, a logo -- in neutral sentences, with no verdict attached. Every market will argue about these same sentences. shot_2 -> noted 3 thing(s) worth writing down analyst 9 events 10:21:07.5
10:21:07.5 looking at shot_0 (1/3) with no idea which country will object
10:21:07.5 observe -> shot_0
10:21:14.7 shot_0 -> noted 4 thing(s) worth writing down
10:21:14.7 reading shot_1 (2/3) the way a regulator would, ruleless for now
10:21:14.7 observe -> shot_1
10:21:22.5 shot_1 -> noted 4 thing(s) worth writing down
10:21:22.5 describing shot_2 (3/3) in plain words, no verdicts yet
10:21:22.5 observe -> shot_2
10:21:30.6 shot_2 -> noted 3 thing(s) worth writing down
Getting everything ready Setting the run up and handing your commercial to the crew. analyst -> 11 observation(s) persisted pipeline 1 event 10:21:30.6
10:21:30.6 analyst -> 11 observation(s) persisted
Asking every market what it thinks One adjudicator per jurisdiction, all at once, each holding its own rulebook and looking up the statute behind anything it objects to. TH clearance -> cleared (0 finding(s)) adjudicator 10 events 10:21:31.2
10:21:31.2 judge -> SA (5 candidates)
10:21:31.3 judge -> AE (2 candidates)
10:21:31.3 judge -> TH (0 candidates)
10:21:41.5 citation check -> AE AE-MOD-01 for obs_shot_0_002
10:21:46.8 citation check -> SA SA-MOD-01 for obs_shot_0_002
10:21:47.8 citation check -> AE AE-MOD-01 for obs_shot_1_002
10:21:54.8 citation check -> SA SA-MOD-01 for obs_shot_1_002
10:22:01.9 AE clearance -> blocked (2 finding(s))
10:22:01.9 SA clearance -> blocked (2 finding(s))
10:22:01.9 TH clearance -> cleared (0 finding(s))
Getting everything ready Setting the run up and handing your commercial to the crew. adjudicate -> 4 finding(s) persisted across 3 market(s) pipeline 1 event 10:22:01.9
10:22:01.9 adjudicate -> 4 finding(s) persisted across 3 market(s)
Putting it all into Grafana Calling Grafana and making sure everything lands there: the numbers, the finding detail, the dashboards to read them on and the alerts that will wake the crew if something needs fixing. mcp update_dashboard('customs-overview', replace $.description) publisher 8 events 10:22:01.9
10:22:01.9 publisher -> connecting to Grafana
10:22:11.0 push_verdicts -> 7 verdict(s), 3 of them a market looking and saying no
10:22:11.6 push_observations -> 11 observation(s) to Loki
10:22:13.1 push_run_telemetry -> {'run_id': 'run_c61fa291681f', 'markets': ['AE', 'SA', 'TH'], 'clearances': {'AE': 'blocked', 'SA': 'blocked', 'TH': 'cleared'}, 'risk_samples': '3 market(s) x 15s', 'logs': 4, 'annotations_created': 4, 'annotations_skipped_as_duplicates': 0, 'failed_stages': []}
10:22:16.0 ensure_dashboards -> ['customs-findings', 'customs-history', 'customs-lanes', 'customs-market', 'customs-overview', 'customs-remediation', 'customs-timeline']
10:22:17.9 mcp search_dashboards('customs')
10:22:21.1 mcp get_dashboard_by_uid('customs-overview')
10:22:25.4 mcp update_dashboard('customs-overview', replace $.description)
Getting everything ready Setting the run up and handing your commercial to the crew. run run_c61fa291681f done pipeline 1 event 10:22:30.3
10:22:30.3 run run_c61fa291681f done
Fixing the shots that failed Working out the cheapest edit that would satisfy the rule, pricing it, and changing only the seconds that were objected to. bridge -> fnd_AE_AE-MOD-01_obs_shot_0_002 (AE-MOD-01, AE) on On_the_trail_of_COCO_MADEMOISELLE.mp4 at 0.00-4.44s remediator 3 events 10:22:39.5
10:22:39.5 console requested remediation: AE-MOD-01 (AE) -> fnd_AE_AE-MOD-01_obs_shot_0_002 [bridge, 2.78 EUR, remedy:0]
10:22:39.5 AE-MOD-01 (AE) -> planned bridge
10:22:39.5 bridge -> fnd_AE_AE-MOD-01_obs_shot_0_002 (AE-MOD-01, AE) on On_the_trail_of_COCO_MADEMOISELLE.mp4 at 0.00-4.44s
Getting everything ready Setting the run up and handing your commercial to the crew. snapshot store=True artifacts=27 pipeline 1 event 10:22:41.8
10:22:41.8 snapshot store=True artifacts=27
Fixing the shots that failed Working out the cheapest edit that would satisfy the rule, pricing it, and changing only the seconds that were objected to. reframe applied -> localized_SA.mp4 (chg_d2927e9f93b2); centre crop for the span, excluding the outer edge of the frame without regenerating any pixels remediator 8 events 10:22:51.5
10:22:51.5 alert received: AE-MOD-01 AE on On_the_trail_of_COCO_MADEMOISELLE -> fnd_AE_AE-MOD-01_obs_shot_1_002
10:22:51.5 alert received: SA-MOD-01 SA on On_the_trail_of_COCO_MADEMOISELLE -> fnd_SA_SA-MOD-01_obs_shot_1_002
10:22:51.5 SA-MOD-01 (SA) -> concept scope, running reframe anyway: The element runs through the whole scene, so a patch cannot reach it: the scene has to be regenerated with the permitted element in its place.
10:22:51.5 SA-MOD-01 (SA) -> planned reframe
10:22:51.5 reframe -> fnd_SA_SA-MOD-01_obs_shot_1_002 (SA-MOD-01, SA) on On_the_trail_of_COCO_MADEMOISELLE.mp4 at 4.44-12.00s
10:22:55.9 bridge head: checked, compliant
10:23:01.0 craft gate passed: length 15.087s, 375 frames, 53.7 dB outside the edit
10:23:01.2 reframe applied -> localized_SA.mp4 (chg_d2927e9f93b2); centre crop for the span, excluding the outer edge of the frame without regenerating any pixels
Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_SA.mp4 verifier 1 event 10:23:01.2
10:23:01.2 verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_SA.mp4
Writing down what is actually there Looking at every shot once and describing what it holds -- a glass, a hemline, a logo -- in neutral sentences, with no verdict attached. Every market will argue about these same sentences. observe -> shot_1 analyst 1 event 10:23:01.2
10:23:01.2 observe -> shot_1
Asking every market what it thinks One adjudicator per jurisdiction, all at once, each holding its own rulebook and looking up the statute behind anything it objects to. judge -> SA (1 candidates) adjudicator 1 event 10:23:12.5
10:23:12.5 judge -> SA (1 candidates)
Fixing the shots that failed Working out the cheapest edit that would satisfy the rule, pricing it, and changing only the seconds that were objected to. bridge tail: checked, compliant remediator 1 event 10:23:16.4
10:23:16.4 bridge tail: checked, compliant
Asking every market what it thinks One adjudicator per jurisdiction, all at once, each holding its own rulebook and looking up the statute behind anything it objects to. citation check -> SA SA-MOD-01 for obs_shot_1_000_v5a21d9 adjudicator 1 event 10:23:19.5
10:23:19.5 citation check -> SA SA-MOD-01 for obs_shot_1_000_v5a21d9
Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. SA clearance recomputed -> blocked verifier 2 events 10:23:24.8
10:23:24.8 NOT fixed: SA-MOD-01 still fires at 4.44-12.00s after reframe; fnd_SA_SA-MOD-01_obs_shot_1_002 back to open
10:23:24.8 SA clearance recomputed -> blocked
Fixing the shots that failed Working out the cheapest edit that would satisfy the rule, pricing it, and changing only the seconds that were objected to. bridge applied -> localized_AE.mp4 (chg_3cf4a0de89b0); regenerated 6s of motion between two edited anchor frames remediator 7 events 10:23:27.9
10:23:27.9 snapshot store=True artifacts=8
10:24:03.2 console requested remediation: SA-MOD-01 (SA) -> fnd_SA_SA-MOD-01_obs_shot_0_002 [bridge, 2.78 EUR, remedy:0]
10:24:03.2 SA-MOD-01 (SA) -> planned bridge
10:24:03.2 bridge -> fnd_SA_SA-MOD-01_obs_shot_0_002 (SA-MOD-01, SA) on localized_SA.mp4 at 0.00-4.44s
10:24:22.1 bridge head: checked, compliant
10:24:22.8 craft gate passed: length 15.087s, 375 frames, 53.8 dB outside the edit
10:24:23.2 bridge applied -> localized_AE.mp4 (chg_3cf4a0de89b0); regenerated 6s of motion between two edited anchor frames
Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_AE.mp4 verifier 1 event 10:24:23.2
10:24:23.2 verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_AE.mp4
Writing down what is actually there Looking at every shot once and describing what it holds -- a glass, a hemline, a logo -- in neutral sentences, with no verdict attached. Every market will argue about these same sentences. observe -> shot_0 analyst 1 event 10:24:23.2
10:24:23.2 observe -> shot_0
Asking every market what it thinks One adjudicator per jurisdiction, all at once, each holding its own rulebook and looking up the statute behind anything it objects to. judge -> AE (0 candidates) adjudicator 1 event 10:24:28.5
10:24:28.5 judge -> AE (0 candidates)
Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. AE clearance recomputed -> blocked verifier 2 events 10:24:28.5
10:24:28.5 fixed: AE-MOD-01 no longer fires at 0.00-4.44s after bridge; fnd_AE_AE-MOD-01_obs_shot_0_002 resolved
10:24:28.5 AE clearance recomputed -> blocked
Fixing the shots that failed Working out the cheapest edit that would satisfy the rule, pricing it, and changing only the seconds that were objected to. reframe applied -> localized_AE.mp4 (chg_b166e13c9177); centre crop for the span, excluding the outer edge of the frame without regenerating any pixels remediator 5 events 10:24:29.4
10:24:29.4 AE-MOD-01 (AE) -> concept scope, running reframe anyway: The element runs through the whole scene, so a patch cannot reach it: the scene has to be regenerated with the permitted element in its place.
10:24:29.4 AE-MOD-01 (AE) -> planned reframe
10:24:29.4 reframe -> fnd_AE_AE-MOD-01_obs_shot_1_002 (AE-MOD-01, AE) on localized_AE.mp4 at 4.44-12.00s
10:24:37.4 craft gate passed: length 15.087s, 375 frames, 54.2 dB outside the edit
10:24:37.6 reframe applied -> localized_AE.mp4 (chg_b166e13c9177); centre crop for the span, excluding the outer edge of the frame without regenerating any pixels
Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_AE.mp4 verifier 1 event 10:24:37.6
10:24:37.6 verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_AE.mp4
Writing down what is actually there Looking at every shot once and describing what it holds -- a glass, a hemline, a logo -- in neutral sentences, with no verdict attached. Every market will argue about these same sentences. observe -> shot_1 analyst 1 event 10:24:37.6
10:24:37.6 observe -> shot_1
Fixing the shots that failed Working out the cheapest edit that would satisfy the rule, pricing it, and changing only the seconds that were objected to. snapshot store=True artifacts=10 remediator 1 event 10:24:40.3
10:24:40.3 snapshot store=True artifacts=10
Asking every market what it thinks One adjudicator per jurisdiction, all at once, each holding its own rulebook and looking up the statute behind anything it objects to. citation check -> AE AE-MOD-01 for obs_shot_1_000_v0fbcd0 adjudicator 2 events 10:24:47.7
10:24:47.7 judge -> AE (1 candidates)
10:24:54.7 citation check -> AE AE-MOD-01 for obs_shot_1_000_v0fbcd0
Fixing the shots that failed Working out the cheapest edit that would satisfy the rule, pricing it, and changing only the seconds that were objected to. bridge tail: checked, compliant remediator 1 event 10:24:59.9
10:24:59.9 bridge tail: checked, compliant
Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. AE clearance recomputed -> blocked verifier 2 events 10:25:02.7
10:25:02.7 NOT fixed: AE-MOD-01 still fires at 4.44-12.00s after reframe; fnd_AE_AE-MOD-01_obs_shot_1_002 back to open
10:25:02.7 AE clearance recomputed -> blocked
Fixing the shots that failed Working out the cheapest edit that would satisfy the rule, pricing it, and changing only the seconds that were objected to. stage_error: remediate: fnd_SA_SA-MOD-01_obs_shot_1_002: RemediationError('Omni\'s content filter refused the input footage itself. Nothing was charged, and a retry cannot help: the footage is the refusal. Use a patch method instead. Omni said: Error code: 400 - {\'error\': {\'message\': "The input could not be submitted. This input contains certain prominent individuals that violate Google\'s Responsible AI practices. If you think this was an er') remediator 25 events 10:25:05.5
10:25:05.5 snapshot store=True artifacts=5
10:25:12.8 stage_error: remediate: bridge failed for fnd_SA_SA-MOD-01_obs_shot_0_002; localized_SA.mp4 untouched, finding back to open
10:25:12.8 stage_error: remediate: fnd_SA_SA-MOD-01_obs_shot_0_002: RuntimeError("Veo refused the request: Veo could not generate videos because the input image violates Vertex AI's usage guidelines. If you think this was an error, send feedback. Support codes: 15236754")
10:49:36.7 console requested remediation: AE-MOD-01 (AE) -> fnd_AE_AE-MOD-01_obs_shot_1_002 [bridge, 3.68 EUR, remedy:0]
10:49:36.7 AE-MOD-01 (AE) -> planned bridge
10:49:36.7 bridge -> fnd_AE_AE-MOD-01_obs_shot_1_002 (AE-MOD-01, AE) on localized_AE.mp4 at 4.44-12.00s
10:49:52.6 bridge head: checked, compliant
10:50:24.1 bridge tail: checked, compliant
10:50:37.0 stage_error: remediate: bridge failed for fnd_AE_AE-MOD-01_obs_shot_1_002; localized_AE.mp4 untouched, finding back to open
10:50:37.0 stage_error: remediate: fnd_AE_AE-MOD-01_obs_shot_1_002: RuntimeError("Veo refused the request: Veo could not generate videos because the input image violates Vertex AI's usage guidelines. If you think this was an error, send feedback. Support codes: 15236754")
10:50:46.9 snapshot store=True artifacts=12
11:03:59.2 console requested remediation: SA-MOD-01 (SA) -> fnd_SA_SA-MOD-01_obs_shot_0_002 [bridge, 2.78 EUR, remedy:0]
11:03:59.2 SA-MOD-01 (SA) -> planned bridge
11:03:59.2 bridge -> fnd_SA_SA-MOD-01_obs_shot_0_002 (SA-MOD-01, SA) on localized_SA.mp4 at 0.00-4.44s
11:04:18.1 bridge head: checked, compliant
11:04:47.7 bridge tail: checked, compliant
11:05:00.7 stage_error: remediate: bridge failed for fnd_SA_SA-MOD-01_obs_shot_0_002; localized_SA.mp4 untouched, finding back to open
11:05:00.7 stage_error: remediate: fnd_SA_SA-MOD-01_obs_shot_0_002: RuntimeError("Veo refused the request: Veo could not generate videos because the input image violates Vertex AI's usage guidelines. If you think this was an error, send feedback. Support codes: 15236754")
11:05:10.9 snapshot store=True artifacts=5
19:27:48.2 console requested remediation: SA-MOD-01 (SA) -> fnd_SA_SA-MOD-01_obs_shot_1_002 [omni, 0.76 EUR, remedy:0]
19:27:48.2 SA-MOD-01 (SA) -> concept scope, running omni anyway: The element runs through the whole scene, so a patch cannot reach it: the scene has to be regenerated with the permitted element in its place.
19:27:48.2 SA-MOD-01 (SA) -> planned omni
19:27:48.2 omni -> fnd_SA_SA-MOD-01_obs_shot_1_002 (SA-MOD-01, SA) on localized_SA.mp4 at 4.44-12.00s
19:28:01.7 stage_error: remediate: omni failed for fnd_SA_SA-MOD-01_obs_shot_1_002; localized_SA.mp4 untouched, finding back to open
19:28:01.8 stage_error: remediate: fnd_SA_SA-MOD-01_obs_shot_1_002: RemediationError('Omni\'s content filter refused the input footage itself. Nothing was charged, and a retry cannot help: the footage is the refusal. Use a patch method instead. Omni said: Error code: 400 - {\'error\': {\'message\': "The input could not be submitted. This input contains certain prominent individuals that violate Google\'s Responsible AI practices. If you think this was an er')
Working The crew is busy on this run. snapshot store=True artifacts=0 operator 4 events 16:40:18.9
16:40:18.9 edit deleted: chg_d2927e9f93b2 and 4 file(s)
16:40:24.3 snapshot store=True artifacts=0
16:59:23.5 edit deleted: chg_3cf4a0de89b0 and 7 file(s)
16:59:25.5 snapshot store=True artifacts=0