THE MEDIA CUSTOMS LAUNCH CONTROL Google Cloud Agent Builder Powered by Grafana
Home Agent Studio
Mission feed

Mission feed

Every move the crew made, in the order it made it. Not a spinner. This is the crew's own event log, streamed over server-sent events straight out of the run store. Stage errors are in here too, because a clearance tool that silently skips a shot is worse than one that admits it.

Stream connecting 189 events
Getting everything ready Setting the run up and handing your commercial to the crew. ingest -> 32 raw shot(s) merged to 32 pipeline 4 events 14:12:10.9
14:12:10.9 console accepted Ed_s_Heinz_Ad.mp4 (79.1s) for AE, DE-PRO7, IN-COLORS, SA-ROTANA
14:12:11.8 run run_bf6b4a1145ee started: asset=runs/uploads/e66175433fb2/Ed_s_Heinz_Ad.mp4 markets=['AE', 'DE-PRO7', 'IN-COLORS', 'SA-ROTANA']
14:12:12.5 ingest -> detecting shots
14:12:15.4 ingest -> 32 raw shot(s) merged to 32
Listening to what is said Writing down the words in each shot, so a claim that is only spoken is caught as surely as one on screen. shot_31 -> 0 char(s) transcription 32 events 14:12:18.0
14:12:18.0 shot_0 -> 48 char(s)
14:12:20.6 shot_1 -> 48 char(s)
14:12:25.0 shot_2 -> 22 char(s)
14:12:27.5 shot_3 -> 14 char(s)
14:12:29.7 shot_4 -> 25 char(s)
14:12:32.5 shot_5 -> 19 char(s)
14:12:35.5 shot_6 -> 65 char(s)
14:12:38.2 shot_7 -> 26 char(s)
14:12:41.6 shot_8 -> 40 char(s)
14:12:44.4 shot_9 -> 62 char(s)
14:12:47.6 shot_10 -> 4 char(s)
14:12:51.9 shot_11 -> 44 char(s)
14:12:56.0 shot_12 -> 62 char(s)
14:12:58.5 shot_13 -> 57 char(s)
14:13:02.0 shot_14 -> 42 char(s)
14:13:06.1 shot_15 -> 108 char(s)
14:13:09.1 shot_16 -> 38 char(s)
14:13:13.2 shot_17 -> 34 char(s)
14:13:15.9 shot_18 -> 75 char(s)
14:13:18.5 shot_19 -> 0 char(s)
14:13:20.8 shot_20 -> 17 char(s)
14:13:23.2 shot_21 -> 31 char(s)
14:13:25.8 shot_22 -> 0 char(s)
14:13:28.7 shot_23 -> 0 char(s)
14:13:32.1 shot_24 -> 0 char(s)
14:13:37.0 shot_25 -> 3 char(s)
14:13:42.3 shot_26 -> 26 char(s)
14:13:44.8 shot_27 -> 17 char(s)
14:13:47.3 shot_28 -> 38 char(s)
14:13:53.3 shot_29 -> 0 char(s)
14:13:56.9 shot_30 -> 40 char(s)
14:14:00.6 shot_31 -> 0 char(s)
Writing down what is actually there Looking at every shot once and describing what it holds -- a glass, a hemline, a logo -- in neutral sentences, with no verdict attached. Every market will argue about these same sentences. observe -> shot_31 analyst 32 events 14:14:22.0
14:14:22.0 observe -> shot_0
14:14:28.8 observe -> shot_1
14:14:35.3 observe -> shot_2
14:14:40.4 observe -> shot_3
14:14:46.6 observe -> shot_4
14:14:52.5 observe -> shot_5
14:14:58.3 observe -> shot_6
14:15:03.4 observe -> shot_7
14:15:08.9 observe -> shot_8
14:15:14.6 observe -> shot_9
14:15:20.2 observe -> shot_10
14:15:25.9 observe -> shot_11
14:15:30.6 observe -> shot_12
14:15:35.8 observe -> shot_13
14:15:42.8 observe -> shot_14
14:15:47.9 observe -> shot_15
14:15:53.1 observe -> shot_16
14:16:00.2 observe -> shot_17
14:16:06.5 observe -> shot_18
14:16:14.6 observe -> shot_19
14:16:19.2 observe -> shot_20
14:16:25.1 observe -> shot_21
14:16:31.3 observe -> shot_22
14:16:36.4 observe -> shot_23
14:16:41.0 observe -> shot_24
14:16:47.0 observe -> shot_25
14:16:52.0 observe -> shot_26
14:16:57.2 observe -> shot_27
14:17:02.5 observe -> shot_28
14:17:08.9 observe -> shot_29
14:17:13.0 observe -> shot_30
14:17:20.0 observe -> shot_31
Getting everything ready Setting the run up and handing your commercial to the crew. analyst -> 89 observation(s) persisted pipeline 1 event 14:17:25.7
14:17:25.7 analyst -> 89 observation(s) persisted
Asking every market what it thinks One adjudicator per jurisdiction, all at once, each holding its own rulebook and looking up the statute behind anything it objects to. SA-ROTANA clearance -> blocked (6 finding(s)) adjudicator 21 events 14:17:26.6
14:17:26.6 judge -> SA-ROTANA (52 candidates)
14:17:26.6 judge -> IN-COLORS (32 candidates)
14:17:26.7 judge -> DE-PRO7 (10 candidates)
14:17:26.7 judge -> AE (67 candidates)
14:18:25.3 citation check -> IN-COLORS IN-ALC-01 for obs_shot_2_002
14:18:32.3 citation check -> SA-ROTANA SA-ALC-01 for obs_shot_2_002
14:18:33.6 citation check -> IN-COLORS IN-ALC-01 for obs_shot_6_001
14:18:41.7 citation check -> IN-COLORS IN-ALC-01 for obs_shot_18_001
14:18:41.9 citation check -> SA-ROTANA SA-ALC-01 for obs_shot_6_001
14:18:59.6 citation check -> SA-ROTANA SA-ALC-01 for obs_shot_7_001
14:19:05.7 citation check -> SA-ROTANA SA-MOD-01 for obs_shot_8_001
14:19:09.3 citation check -> AE AE-ALC-01 for obs_shot_2_002
14:19:12.9 citation check -> SA-ROTANA SA-MOD-01 for obs_shot_9_001
14:19:15.7 citation check -> AE AE-ALC-01 for obs_shot_6_001
14:19:19.6 citation check -> SA-ROTANA SA-ALC-01 for obs_shot_18_001
14:19:22.1 citation check -> AE AE-ALC-01 for obs_shot_7_001
14:19:28.1 citation check -> AE AE-ALC-01 for obs_shot_18_001
14:19:35.8 AE clearance -> blocked (4 finding(s))
14:19:35.8 DE-PRO7 clearance -> cleared (0 finding(s))
14:19:35.8 IN-COLORS clearance -> blocked (3 finding(s))
14:19:35.8 SA-ROTANA clearance -> blocked (6 finding(s))
Getting everything ready Setting the run up and handing your commercial to the crew. adjudicate -> 13 finding(s) persisted across 4 market(s) pipeline 1 event 14:19:35.8
14:19:35.8 adjudicate -> 13 finding(s) persisted across 4 market(s)
Putting it all into Grafana Calling Grafana and making sure everything lands there: the numbers, the finding detail, the dashboards to read them on and the alerts that will wake the crew if something needs fixing. mcp update_dashboard('customs-overview', replace $.description) publisher 6 events 14:19:35.8
14:19:35.8 publisher -> connecting to Grafana
14:20:02.0 push_run_telemetry -> {'run_id': 'run_bf6b4a1145ee', 'markets': ['AE', 'DE-PRO7', 'IN-COLORS', 'SA-ROTANA'], 'clearances': {'AE': 'blocked', 'DE-PRO7': 'cleared', 'IN-COLORS': 'blocked', 'SA-ROTANA': 'blocked'}, 'risk_samples': '4 market(s) x 79s', 'logs': 13, 'annotations_created': 13, 'annotations_skipped_as_duplicates': 0, 'failed_stages': []}
14:20:04.8 ensure_dashboards -> ['customs-findings', 'customs-history', 'customs-market', 'customs-overview', 'customs-remediation', 'customs-timeline']
14:20:06.0 mcp search_dashboards('customs')
14:20:07.9 mcp get_dashboard_by_uid('customs-overview')
14:20:11.9 mcp update_dashboard('customs-overview', replace $.description)
Getting everything ready Setting the run up and handing your commercial to the crew. run run_bf6b4a1145ee done pipeline 1 event 14:20:14.3
14:20:14.3 run run_bf6b4a1145ee done
Fixing the shots that failed Working out the cheapest edit that would satisfy the rule, pricing it, and changing only the seconds that were objected to. bridge applied -> localized_SA-ROTANA.mp4 (chg_9257857edd3d); regenerated 4s of motion between two edited anchor frames remediator 10 events 14:23:07.1
14:23:07.1 console requested remediation: IN-ALC-01 (IN-COLORS) -> fnd_IN-COLORS_IN-ALC-01_obs_shot_18_001 [bridge, 1.88 EUR, remedy:0]
14:23:07.1 IN-ALC-01 (IN-COLORS) -> planned bridge
14:23:07.1 bridge -> fnd_IN-COLORS_IN-ALC-01_obs_shot_18_001 (IN-ALC-01, IN-COLORS) on Ed_s_Heinz_Ad.mp4 at 47.96-51.40s
14:24:34.5 stage_error: remediate: bridge failed for fnd_IN-COLORS_IN-ALC-01_obs_shot_18_001; localized_IN-COLORS.mp4 untouched, finding back to open
14:24:34.5 stage_error: remediate: fnd_IN-COLORS_IN-ALC-01_obs_shot_18_001: RuntimeError('Veo returned no video: GenerateVideosResponse(\n rai_media_filtered_count=1,\n rai_media_filtered_reasons=[\n "1 videos were filtered out because they violated Vertex AI\'s usage guidelines. You will not be charged for blocked videos. Try rephrasing the prompt. If you think this was an error, send feedback. Support codes: 15236754",\n ]\n)')
14:24:38.0 snapshot store=True artifacts=4
14:39:17.4 console requested remediation: SA-ALC-01 (SA-ROTANA) -> fnd_SA-ROTANA_SA-ALC-01_obs_shot_6_001 [bridge, 1.88 EUR, remedy:0]
14:39:17.4 SA-ALC-01 (SA-ROTANA) -> planned bridge
14:39:17.4 bridge -> fnd_SA-ROTANA_SA-ALC-01_obs_shot_6_001 (SA-ALC-01, SA-ROTANA) on Ed_s_Heinz_Ad.mp4 at 12.16-16.12s
14:41:32.3 bridge applied -> localized_SA-ROTANA.mp4 (chg_9257857edd3d); regenerated 4s of motion between two edited anchor frames
Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_SA-ROTANA.mp4 verifier 1 event 14:41:32.3
14:41:32.3 verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_SA-ROTANA.mp4
Writing down what is actually there Looking at every shot once and describing what it holds -- a glass, a hemline, a logo -- in neutral sentences, with no verdict attached. Every market will argue about these same sentences. observe -> shot_6 analyst 1 event 14:41:32.3
14:41:32.3 observe -> shot_6
Asking every market what it thinks One adjudicator per jurisdiction, all at once, each holding its own rulebook and looking up the statute behind anything it objects to. citation check -> SA-ROTANA SA-ALC-01 for obs_shot_6_003_v60c7f2 adjudicator 3 events 14:41:41.3
14:41:41.3 judge -> SA-ROTANA (5 candidates)
14:41:49.9 citation check -> SA-ROTANA SA-MOD-01 for obs_shot_6_002_v60c7f2
14:41:57.0 citation check -> SA-ROTANA SA-ALC-01 for obs_shot_6_003_v60c7f2
Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. SA-ROTANA clearance recomputed -> blocked verifier 3 events 14:42:03.4
14:42:03.4 NOT fixed: SA-ALC-01 still fires at 12.16-16.12s after bridge; fnd_SA-ROTANA_SA-ALC-01_obs_shot_6_001 back to open
14:42:03.4 verification surfaced 1 new finding(s) in the edited shot(s): SA-MOD-01
14:42:03.4 SA-ROTANA clearance recomputed -> blocked
Fixing the shots that failed Working out the cheapest edit that would satisfy the rule, pricing it, and changing only the seconds that were objected to. reframe applied -> localized_SA-ROTANA.mp4 (chg_fe50458be1dd); centre crop for the span, excluding the outer edge of the frame without regenerating any pixels remediator 6 events 14:42:10.1
14:42:10.1 snapshot store=True artifacts=7
14:42:50.8 alert received: SA-ALC-01 SA-ROTANA on Ed_s_Heinz_Ad -> fnd_SA-ROTANA_SA-ALC-01_obs_shot_18_001
14:42:50.8 alert received: SA-MOD-01 SA-ROTANA on Ed_s_Heinz_Ad -> fnd_SA-ROTANA_SA-MOD-01_obs_shot_6_002_v60c7f2
14:42:50.8 SA-MOD-01 (SA-ROTANA) -> planned reframe
14:42:50.8 reframe -> fnd_SA-ROTANA_SA-MOD-01_obs_shot_6_002_v60c7f2 (SA-MOD-01, SA-ROTANA) on localized_SA-ROTANA.mp4 at 12.16-16.12s
14:43:23.3 reframe applied -> localized_SA-ROTANA.mp4 (chg_fe50458be1dd); centre crop for the span, excluding the outer edge of the frame without regenerating any pixels
Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_SA-ROTANA.mp4 verifier 1 event 14:43:23.3
14:43:23.3 verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_SA-ROTANA.mp4
Writing down what is actually there Looking at every shot once and describing what it holds -- a glass, a hemline, a logo -- in neutral sentences, with no verdict attached. Every market will argue about these same sentences. observe -> shot_6 analyst 1 event 14:43:23.3
14:43:23.3 observe -> shot_6
Asking every market what it thinks One adjudicator per jurisdiction, all at once, each holding its own rulebook and looking up the statute behind anything it objects to. citation check -> SA-ROTANA SA-ALC-01 for obs_shot_6_003_v4a5549 adjudicator 3 events 14:43:29.7
14:43:29.7 judge -> SA-ROTANA (5 candidates)
14:43:41.7 citation check -> SA-ROTANA SA-MOD-01 for obs_shot_6_001_v4a5549
14:43:48.6 citation check -> SA-ROTANA SA-ALC-01 for obs_shot_6_003_v4a5549
Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. SA-ROTANA clearance recomputed -> blocked verifier 2 events 14:43:58.5
14:43:58.5 NOT fixed: SA-MOD-01 still fires at 12.16-16.12s after reframe; fnd_SA-ROTANA_SA-MOD-01_obs_shot_6_002_v60c7f2 back to open
14:43:58.5 SA-ROTANA clearance recomputed -> blocked
Fixing the shots that failed Working out the cheapest edit that would satisfy the rule, pricing it, and changing only the seconds that were objected to. prop_swap applied -> localized_SA-ROTANA.mp4 (chg_9f99ceb003dd); swapped the non-compliant prop for a Rotana Khalijia-appropriate one remediator 5 events 14:43:59.1
14:43:59.1 SA-ALC-01 (SA-ROTANA) -> planned prop_swap
14:43:59.1 prop_swap -> fnd_SA-ROTANA_SA-ALC-01_obs_shot_18_001 (SA-ALC-01, SA-ROTANA) on localized_SA-ROTANA.mp4 at 47.96-51.40s
14:44:03.7 snapshot store=True artifacts=6
14:45:10.2 prop_swap instruction: Edit this frame from a television commercial. Replace every alcoholic drink, bottle and glass with a non-alcoholic drink that suits Rotana Khalijia, for example tea in the same style of glass, keeping the same number of items in the same places. Keep the lighting, the composition, the camera angle, the hands and the people exactly as they are, and change nothing else in the frame.
14:45:10.5 prop_swap applied -> localized_SA-ROTANA.mp4 (chg_9f99ceb003dd); swapped the non-compliant prop for a Rotana Khalijia-appropriate one
Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_SA-ROTANA.mp4 verifier 1 event 14:45:10.5
14:45:10.5 verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_SA-ROTANA.mp4
Writing down what is actually there Looking at every shot once and describing what it holds -- a glass, a hemline, a logo -- in neutral sentences, with no verdict attached. Every market will argue about these same sentences. observe -> shot_18 analyst 1 event 14:45:10.5
14:45:10.5 observe -> shot_18
Asking every market what it thinks One adjudicator per jurisdiction, all at once, each holding its own rulebook and looking up the statute behind anything it objects to. citation check -> SA-ROTANA SA-ALC-01 for obs_shot_18_000_v899820 adjudicator 2 events 14:45:17.5
14:45:17.5 judge -> SA-ROTANA (3 candidates)
14:45:31.1 citation check -> SA-ROTANA SA-ALC-01 for obs_shot_18_000_v899820
Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. SA-ROTANA clearance recomputed -> blocked verifier 2 events 14:45:36.7
14:45:36.7 NOT fixed: SA-ALC-01 still fires at 47.96-51.40s after prop_swap; fnd_SA-ROTANA_SA-ALC-01_obs_shot_18_001 back to open
14:45:36.7 SA-ROTANA clearance recomputed -> blocked
Fixing the shots that failed Working out the cheapest edit that would satisfy the rule, pricing it, and changing only the seconds that were objected to. bridge applied -> localized_SA-ROTANA.mp4 (chg_19cb7222ac3d); regenerated 4s of motion between two edited anchor frames remediator 14 events 15:54:21.7
15:54:21.7 console requested remediation: SA-ALC-01 (SA-ROTANA) -> fnd_SA-ROTANA_SA-ALC-01_obs_shot_18_001 [bridge, 1.88 EUR, remedy:1]
15:54:21.7 SA-ALC-01 (SA-ROTANA) -> planned bridge
15:54:21.7 bridge -> fnd_SA-ROTANA_SA-ALC-01_obs_shot_18_001 (SA-ALC-01, SA-ROTANA) on localized_SA-ROTANA.mp4 at 47.96-51.40s
15:54:41.2 bridge head: checked, compliant
15:55:00.9 bridge tail: checked, compliant
15:55:46.3 stage_error: remediate: bridge failed for fnd_SA-ROTANA_SA-ALC-01_obs_shot_18_001; localized_SA-ROTANA.mp4 untouched, finding back to open
15:55:46.3 stage_error: remediate: fnd_SA-ROTANA_SA-ALC-01_obs_shot_18_001: RuntimeError('Veo returned no video: GenerateVideosResponse(\n rai_media_filtered_count=1,\n rai_media_filtered_reasons=[\n "1 videos were filtered out because they violated Vertex AI\'s usage guidelines. You will not be charged for blocked videos. Try rephrasing the prompt. If you think this was an error, send feedback. Support codes: 29310472",\n ]\n)')
15:55:52.7 snapshot store=True artifacts=20
16:07:50.0 console requested remediation: SA-MOD-01 (SA-ROTANA) -> fnd_SA-ROTANA_SA-MOD-01_obs_shot_8_001 [bridge, 1.88 EUR, remedy:0]
16:07:50.0 SA-MOD-01 (SA-ROTANA) -> planned bridge
16:07:50.0 bridge -> fnd_SA-ROTANA_SA-MOD-01_obs_shot_8_001 (SA-MOD-01, SA-ROTANA) on localized_SA-ROTANA.mp4 at 18.52-20.68s
16:08:05.2 bridge head: checked, compliant
16:08:20.5 bridge tail: checked, compliant
16:09:27.1 bridge applied -> localized_SA-ROTANA.mp4 (chg_19cb7222ac3d); regenerated 4s of motion between two edited anchor frames
Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_SA-ROTANA.mp4 verifier 1 event 16:09:27.1
16:09:27.1 verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_SA-ROTANA.mp4
Writing down what is actually there Looking at every shot once and describing what it holds -- a glass, a hemline, a logo -- in neutral sentences, with no verdict attached. Every market will argue about these same sentences. observe -> shot_8 analyst 1 event 16:09:27.1
16:09:27.1 observe -> shot_8
Asking every market what it thinks One adjudicator per jurisdiction, all at once, each holding its own rulebook and looking up the statute behind anything it objects to. citation check -> SA-ROTANA SA-MOD-01 for obs_shot_8_001_v609ea8 adjudicator 2 events 16:09:32.4
16:09:32.4 judge -> SA-ROTANA (2 candidates)
16:09:44.3 citation check -> SA-ROTANA SA-MOD-01 for obs_shot_8_001_v609ea8
Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. SA-ROTANA clearance recomputed -> blocked verifier 2 events 16:09:50.5
16:09:50.5 NOT fixed: SA-MOD-01 still fires at 18.52-20.68s after bridge; fnd_SA-ROTANA_SA-MOD-01_obs_shot_8_001 back to open
16:09:50.5 SA-ROTANA clearance recomputed -> blocked
Fixing the shots that failed Working out the cheapest edit that would satisfy the rule, pricing it, and changing only the seconds that were objected to. reframe applied -> localized_SA-ROTANA.mp4 (chg_c5ca164c87cb); centre crop for the span, excluding the outer edge of the frame without regenerating any pixels remediator 6 events 16:09:55.9
16:09:55.9 snapshot store=True artifacts=8
16:10:50.7 alert received: SA-MOD-01 SA-ROTANA on Ed_s_Heinz_Ad -> fnd_SA-ROTANA_SA-MOD-01_obs_shot_6_002_v60c7f2
16:10:50.7 alert received: SA-ALC-01 SA-ROTANA on Ed_s_Heinz_Ad -> fnd_SA-ROTANA_SA-ALC-01_obs_shot_18_001
16:10:50.7 SA-MOD-01 (SA-ROTANA) -> planned reframe
16:10:50.7 reframe -> fnd_SA-ROTANA_SA-MOD-01_obs_shot_6_002_v60c7f2 (SA-MOD-01, SA-ROTANA) on localized_SA-ROTANA.mp4 at 12.16-16.12s
16:11:13.7 reframe applied -> localized_SA-ROTANA.mp4 (chg_c5ca164c87cb); centre crop for the span, excluding the outer edge of the frame without regenerating any pixels
Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_SA-ROTANA.mp4 verifier 1 event 16:11:13.7
16:11:13.7 verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_SA-ROTANA.mp4
Writing down what is actually there Looking at every shot once and describing what it holds -- a glass, a hemline, a logo -- in neutral sentences, with no verdict attached. Every market will argue about these same sentences. observe -> shot_6 analyst 1 event 16:11:13.7
16:11:13.7 observe -> shot_6
Asking every market what it thinks One adjudicator per jurisdiction, all at once, each holding its own rulebook and looking up the statute behind anything it objects to. citation check -> SA-ROTANA SA-ALC-01 for obs_shot_6_002_vdcdb91 adjudicator 3 events 16:11:19.5
16:11:19.5 judge -> SA-ROTANA (4 candidates)
16:11:34.7 citation check -> SA-ROTANA SA-MOD-01 for obs_shot_6_000_vdcdb91
16:11:40.0 citation check -> SA-ROTANA SA-ALC-01 for obs_shot_6_002_vdcdb91
Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. SA-ROTANA clearance recomputed -> blocked verifier 2 events 16:11:45.9
16:11:45.9 NOT fixed: SA-MOD-01 still fires at 12.16-16.12s after reframe; fnd_SA-ROTANA_SA-MOD-01_obs_shot_6_002_v60c7f2 back to open
16:11:45.9 SA-ROTANA clearance recomputed -> blocked
Fixing the shots that failed Working out the cheapest edit that would satisfy the rule, pricing it, and changing only the seconds that were objected to. prop_swap applied -> localized_SA-ROTANA.mp4 (chg_09b9643db989); swapped the non-compliant prop for a Rotana Khalijia-appropriate one remediator 5 events 16:11:46.5
16:11:46.5 SA-ALC-01 (SA-ROTANA) -> planned prop_swap
16:11:46.5 prop_swap -> fnd_SA-ROTANA_SA-ALC-01_obs_shot_18_001 (SA-ALC-01, SA-ROTANA) on localized_SA-ROTANA.mp4 at 47.96-51.40s
16:11:51.1 snapshot store=True artifacts=6
16:12:46.5 prop_swap instruction: Edit this frame from a television commercial. Replace each alcoholic drink, bottle, glass, cigarette, cigar, tobacco pack or ashtray that is already visible with a permitted equivalent for Rotana Khalijia -- tea in the same style of glass in place of a drink, a pen or nothing at all in place of a cigarette, a closed box with no branding in place of a pack -- keeping the same number of items in the same places and adding none. Keep the lighting, the composition, the camera angle, the hands and the people exactly as they are, and change nothing else in the frame. Do not add any new object anywhere in the frame, and do not put a replacement where there was nothing before: only what is already there may change.
16:12:46.7 prop_swap applied -> localized_SA-ROTANA.mp4 (chg_09b9643db989); swapped the non-compliant prop for a Rotana Khalijia-appropriate one
Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_SA-ROTANA.mp4 verifier 1 event 16:12:46.7
16:12:46.7 verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_SA-ROTANA.mp4
Writing down what is actually there Looking at every shot once and describing what it holds -- a glass, a hemline, a logo -- in neutral sentences, with no verdict attached. Every market will argue about these same sentences. observe -> shot_18 analyst 1 event 16:12:46.7
16:12:46.7 observe -> shot_18
Asking every market what it thinks One adjudicator per jurisdiction, all at once, each holding its own rulebook and looking up the statute behind anything it objects to. citation check -> SA-ROTANA SA-ALC-01 for obs_shot_18_000_vc87de7 adjudicator 2 events 16:12:52.9
16:12:52.9 judge -> SA-ROTANA (3 candidates)
16:12:59.1 citation check -> SA-ROTANA SA-ALC-01 for obs_shot_18_000_vc87de7
Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. SA-ROTANA clearance recomputed -> blocked verifier 2 events 16:13:04.6
16:13:04.6 NOT fixed: SA-ALC-01 still fires at 47.96-51.40s after prop_swap; fnd_SA-ROTANA_SA-ALC-01_obs_shot_18_001 back to open
16:13:04.6 SA-ROTANA clearance recomputed -> blocked
Fixing the shots that failed Working out the cheapest edit that would satisfy the rule, pricing it, and changing only the seconds that were objected to. snapshot store=True artifacts=5 remediator 1 event 16:13:09.9
16:13:09.9 snapshot store=True artifacts=5
Working The crew is busy on this run. snapshot store=True artifacts=2 operator 4 events 16:40:43.4
16:40:43.4 edit deleted: chg_9f99ceb003dd and 5 file(s)
16:40:45.1 snapshot store=True artifacts=0
19:15:40.9 edit deleted: chg_09b9643db989 and 7 file(s)
19:15:45.0 snapshot store=True artifacts=2