Mission feed

Getting everything ready Setting the run up and handing your commercial to the crew. ingest -> detecting shots pipeline 3 events 08:36:52.5

08:36:52.5 console accepted test.mp4 (42.1s) for GLOBAL, EU

08:36:52.5 run run_3ea5230a429f started: asset=runs/uploads/31a432611e02/test.mp4 markets=['GLOBAL', 'EU']

08:36:52.5 ingest -> detecting shots

Watching the film for the first time Cutting your commercial into its own shots, listening to the soundtrack, and measuring the picture for flashing that could trouble a photosensitive viewer. found 14 cut(s) in 42.1s of film ingest 2 events 08:36:52.5

08:36:52.5 watching the film end to end, hunting for the cuts

08:36:55.8 found 14 cut(s) in 42.1s of film

Getting everything ready Setting the run up and handing your commercial to the crew. ingest -> 14 raw shot(s) merged to 14 pipeline 1 event 08:36:55.8

08:36:55.8 ingest -> 14 raw shot(s) merged to 14

Watching the film for the first time Cutting your commercial into its own shots, listening to the soundtrack, and measuring the picture for flashing that could trouble a photosensitive viewer. 14 shot(s) to read, one at a time, no skimming ingest 1 event 08:36:55.8

08:36:55.8 14 shot(s) to read, one at a time, no skimming

Listening to what is said Writing down the words in each shot, so a claim that is only spoken is caught as surely as one on screen. shot_13 -> said nothing at all transcription 28 events 08:36:55.8

08:36:55.8 listening to shot_0 (1/14), 7.4s of audio

08:36:59.0 shot_0 -> 11 char(s)

08:36:59.0 listening to shot_1 (2/14), 5.3s of audio

08:37:01.9 shot_1 -> said nothing at all

08:37:01.9 listening to shot_2 (3/14), 1.8s of audio

08:37:05.2 shot_2 -> 20 char(s)

08:37:05.2 listening to shot_3 (4/14), 5.8s of audio

08:37:08.5 shot_3 -> 93 char(s)

08:37:08.5 listening to shot_4 (5/14), 3.4s of audio

08:37:10.9 shot_4 -> 46 char(s)

08:37:10.9 listening to shot_5 (6/14), 2.3s of audio

08:37:13.5 shot_5 -> 26 char(s)

08:37:13.5 listening to shot_6 (7/14), 4.3s of audio

08:37:15.6 shot_6 -> 40 char(s)

08:37:15.6 listening to shot_7 (8/14), 0.9s of audio

08:37:18.5 shot_7 -> said nothing at all

08:37:18.5 listening to shot_8 (9/14), 0.7s of audio

08:37:21.0 shot_8 -> said nothing at all

08:37:21.0 listening to shot_9 (10/14), 0.7s of audio

08:37:24.0 shot_9 -> 18 char(s)

08:37:24.0 listening to shot_10 (11/14), 0.9s of audio

08:37:26.3 shot_10 -> said nothing at all

08:37:26.3 listening to shot_11 (12/14), 0.5s of audio

08:37:28.4 shot_11 -> 24 char(s)

08:37:28.4 listening to shot_12 (13/14), 6.0s of audio

08:37:30.7 shot_12 -> 42 char(s)

08:37:30.7 listening to shot_13 (14/14), 1.9s of audio

08:37:34.6 shot_13 -> said nothing at all

Writing down what is actually there Looking at every shot once and describing what it holds -- a glass, a hemline, a logo -- in neutral sentences, with no verdict attached. Every market will argue about these same sentences. shot_13 -> noted 5 thing(s) worth writing down analyst 43 events 08:37:39.3

08:37:39.3 looking at shot_0 (1/14) with no idea which country will object

08:37:39.3 observe -> shot_0

08:37:46.2 shot_0 -> noted 5 thing(s) worth writing down

08:37:46.2 reading shot_1 (2/14) the way a regulator would, ruleless for now

08:37:46.2 observe -> shot_1

08:37:51.9 shot_1 -> noted 1 thing(s) worth writing down

08:37:51.9 describing shot_2 (3/14) in plain words, no verdicts yet

08:37:51.9 observe -> shot_2

08:37:56.5 shot_2 -> noted 3 thing(s) worth writing down

08:37:56.5 shot_3 (4/14): what is on screen, not what it means

08:37:56.5 observe -> shot_3

08:38:02.8 shot_3 -> noted 3 thing(s) worth writing down

08:38:02.8 watching shot_4 (5/14) for the thing eleven markets disagree about

08:38:02.8 observe -> shot_4

08:38:08.4 shot_4 -> noted 4 thing(s) worth writing down

08:38:08.4 taking shot_5 (6/14) apart, one observation at a time

08:38:08.4 observe -> shot_5

08:38:13.4 shot_5 -> noted 3 thing(s) worth writing down

08:38:13.4 looking at shot_6 (7/14) with no idea which country will object

08:38:13.4 observe -> shot_6

08:38:22.3 shot_6 -> noted 4 thing(s) worth writing down

08:38:22.3 reading shot_7 (8/14) the way a regulator would, ruleless for now

08:38:22.3 observe -> shot_7

08:38:28.9 shot_7 -> noted 3 thing(s) worth writing down

08:38:28.9 describing shot_8 (9/14) in plain words, no verdicts yet

08:38:28.9 observe -> shot_8

08:38:36.7 shot_8 -> noted 3 thing(s) worth writing down

08:38:36.7 shot_9 (10/14): what is on screen, not what it means

08:38:36.7 observe -> shot_9

08:38:42.8 shot_9 -> noted 2 thing(s) worth writing down

08:38:42.8 watching shot_10 (11/14) for the thing eleven markets disagree about

08:38:42.8 observe -> shot_10

08:38:51.4 observe -> shot_10

08:38:57.0 shot_10 -> noted 3 thing(s) worth writing down

08:38:57.0 taking shot_11 (12/14) apart, one observation at a time

08:38:57.0 observe -> shot_11

08:39:02.0 shot_11 -> noted 2 thing(s) worth writing down

08:39:02.0 looking at shot_12 (13/14) with no idea which country will object

08:39:02.0 observe -> shot_12

08:39:08.3 shot_12 -> noted 2 thing(s) worth writing down

08:39:08.3 reading shot_13 (14/14) the way a regulator would, ruleless for now

08:39:08.3 observe -> shot_13

08:39:14.1 shot_13 -> noted 5 thing(s) worth writing down

Getting everything ready Setting the run up and handing your commercial to the crew. analyst -> 43 observation(s) persisted pipeline 1 event 08:39:14.1

08:39:14.1 analyst -> 43 observation(s) persisted

Asking every market what it thinks One adjudicator per jurisdiction, all at once, each holding its own rulebook and looking up the statute behind anything it objects to. EU clearance -> cleared (0 finding(s)) adjudicator 4 events 08:39:14.6

08:39:14.6 judge -> GLOBAL (0 candidates)

08:39:14.6 judge -> EU (8 candidates)

08:39:27.2 GLOBAL clearance -> cleared (0 finding(s))

08:39:27.2 EU clearance -> cleared (0 finding(s))

Getting everything ready Setting the run up and handing your commercial to the crew. adjudicate -> 0 finding(s) persisted across 2 market(s) pipeline 1 event 08:39:27.2

08:39:27.2 adjudicate -> 0 finding(s) persisted across 2 market(s)

Putting it all into Grafana Calling Grafana and making sure everything lands there: the numbers, the finding detail, the dashboards to read them on and the alerts that will wake the crew if something needs fixing. mcp update_dashboard('customs-overview', replace $.description) publisher 6 events 08:39:27.2

08:39:27.2 publisher -> connecting to Grafana

08:39:30.9 stage_error: publisher: push_run_telemetry failed: RuntimeError('telemetry push failed: HTTP 429: {"code":8,"message":"the request has been rejected because the tenant exceeded the request rate limit, set to 75 requests/s across all distributors with a maximum allowed burst of 750 (err-mimir-tenant-max-request-rate). To adjust the related per-tenant limits, configure -distributor.request-rate-limit and -distributor.request-burst-size, or contact your service administrator."}')

08:39:34.3 ensure_dashboards -> ['customs-findings', 'customs-grid', 'customs-history', 'customs-lanes', 'customs-market', 'customs-overview', 'customs-remediation', 'customs-timeline']

08:39:35.7 mcp search_dashboards('customs')

08:39:37.3 mcp get_dashboard_by_uid('customs-overview')

08:39:40.9 mcp update_dashboard('customs-overview', replace $.description)

Getting everything ready Setting the run up and handing your commercial to the crew. add analysis -> 43 stored observation(s), no re-ingest, judging AE pipeline 3 events 08:39:44.4

08:39:44.4 run run_3ea5230a429f done

08:40:04.0 snapshot store=True artifacts=71

08:40:22.3 add analysis -> 43 stored observation(s), no re-ingest, judging AE

Asking every market what it thinks One adjudicator per jurisdiction, all at once, each holding its own rulebook and looking up the statute behind anything it objects to. judge -> AE (14 candidates) adjudicator 1 event 08:40:22.3

08:40:22.3 judge -> AE (14 candidates)

Getting everything ready Setting the run up and handing your commercial to the crew. add analysis -> 43 stored observation(s), no re-ingest, judging AE-DUBAITV, BE-PLAY, BE-RTBF, BE-VRT pipeline 1 event 08:40:49.6

08:40:49.6 add analysis -> 43 stored observation(s), no re-ingest, judging AE-DUBAITV, BE-PLAY, BE-RTBF, BE-VRT

Asking every market what it thinks One adjudicator per jurisdiction, all at once, each holding its own rulebook and looking up the statute behind anything it objects to. AE clearance -> blocked (5 finding(s)) adjudicator 7 events 08:40:49.6

08:40:49.6 judge -> AE-DUBAITV (14 candidates)

08:40:50.8 citation check -> AE AE-ALC-01 for obs_shot_0_001

08:40:56.7 citation check -> AE AE-MOD-01 for obs_shot_0_002

08:41:04.1 citation check -> AE AE-MOD-01 for obs_shot_2_000

08:41:10.7 citation check -> AE AE-MOD-01 for obs_shot_8_000

08:41:16.7 citation check -> AE AE-MOD-01 for obs_shot_9_000

08:41:22.3 AE clearance -> blocked (5 finding(s))

Putting it all into Grafana Calling Grafana and making sure everything lands there: the numbers, the finding detail, the dashboards to read them on and the alerts that will wake the crew if something needs fixing. stage_error: publisher: add analysis: RuntimeError('telemetry push failed: HTTP 429: {"code":8,"message":"the request has been rejected because the tenant exceeded the request rate limit, set to 75 requests/s across all distributors with a maximum allowed burst of 750 (err-mimir-tenant-max-request-rate). To adjust the related per-tenant limits, configure -distributor.request-rate-limit and -distributor.request-burst-size, or contact your service administrator."}') publisher 1 event 08:41:22.9

08:41:22.9 stage_error: publisher: add analysis: RuntimeError('telemetry push failed: HTTP 429: {"code":8,"message":"the request has been rejected because the tenant exceeded the request rate limit, set to 75 requests/s across all distributors with a maximum allowed burst of 750 (err-mimir-tenant-max-request-rate). To adjust the related per-tenant limits, configure -distributor.request-rate-limit and -distributor.request-burst-size, or contact your service administrator."}')

Asking every market what it thinks One adjudicator per jurisdiction, all at once, each holding its own rulebook and looking up the statute behind anything it objects to. citation check -> AE-DUBAITV AE-MOD-01 for obs_shot_0_002 adjudicator 2 events 08:41:24.4

08:41:24.4 citation check -> AE-DUBAITV AE-ALC-01 for obs_shot_0_001

08:41:31.5 citation check -> AE-DUBAITV AE-MOD-01 for obs_shot_0_002

Getting everything ready Setting the run up and handing your commercial to the crew. snapshot store=True artifacts=6 pipeline 1 event 08:41:34.0

08:41:34.0 snapshot store=True artifacts=6

Asking every market what it thinks One adjudicator per jurisdiction, all at once, each holding its own rulebook and looking up the statute behind anything it objects to. citation check -> BE-RTBF BE-LANG-01 for obs_shot_0_000 adjudicator 9 events 08:41:37.4

08:41:37.4 citation check -> AE-DUBAITV AE-MOD-01 for obs_shot_2_000

08:41:43.2 citation check -> AE-DUBAITV AE-MOD-01 for obs_shot_8_000

08:41:49.7 citation check -> AE-DUBAITV AE-MOD-01 for obs_shot_9_000

08:41:56.8 AE-DUBAITV clearance -> blocked (5 finding(s))

08:41:56.8 judge -> BE-PLAY (14 candidates)

08:42:21.1 citation check -> BE-PLAY BE-LANG-01 for obs_shot_0_000

08:42:33.1 BE-PLAY clearance -> cleared (1 finding(s))

08:42:33.1 judge -> BE-RTBF (14 candidates)

08:42:58.9 citation check -> BE-RTBF BE-LANG-01 for obs_shot_0_000

Fixing the shots that failed Working out the cheapest edit that would satisfy the rule, pricing it, and changing only the seconds that were objected to. omni -> fnd_AE_AE-MOD-01_obs_shot_2_000 (AE-MOD-01, AE) on test.mp4 at 12.78-14.62s remediator 4 events 08:42:59.3

08:42:59.3 console requested remediation: AE-MOD-01 (AE) -> fnd_AE_AE-MOD-01_obs_shot_2_000 [omni, 0.19 EUR, remedy:2]

08:42:59.3 AE-MOD-01 (AE) -> concept scope, running omni anyway: The element runs through the whole scene, so a patch cannot reach it: the scene has to be regenerated with the permitted element in its place.

08:42:59.3 AE-MOD-01 (AE) -> planned omni

08:42:59.3 omni -> fnd_AE_AE-MOD-01_obs_shot_2_000 (AE-MOD-01, AE) on test.mp4 at 12.78-14.62s

Asking every market what it thinks One adjudicator per jurisdiction, all at once, each holding its own rulebook and looking up the statute behind anything it objects to. BE-VRT clearance -> cleared (1 finding(s)) adjudicator 4 events 08:43:06.2

08:43:06.2 BE-RTBF clearance -> cleared (1 finding(s))

08:43:06.2 judge -> BE-VRT (18 candidates)

08:43:44.8 citation check -> BE-VRT BE-LANG-01 for obs_shot_0_000

08:43:55.2 BE-VRT clearance -> cleared (1 finding(s))

Putting it all into Grafana Calling Grafana and making sure everything lands there: the numbers, the finding detail, the dashboards to read them on and the alerts that will wake the crew if something needs fixing. stage_error: publisher: add analysis: RuntimeError('telemetry push failed: HTTP 429: {"code":8,"message":"the request has been rejected because the tenant exceeded the request rate limit, set to 75 requests/s across all distributors with a maximum allowed burst of 750 (err-mimir-tenant-max-request-rate). To adjust the related per-tenant limits, configure -distributor.request-rate-limit and -distributor.request-burst-size, or contact your service administrator."}') publisher 1 event 08:43:55.9

08:43:55.9 stage_error: publisher: add analysis: RuntimeError('telemetry push failed: HTTP 429: {"code":8,"message":"the request has been rejected because the tenant exceeded the request rate limit, set to 75 requests/s across all distributors with a maximum allowed burst of 750 (err-mimir-tenant-max-request-rate). To adjust the related per-tenant limits, configure -distributor.request-rate-limit and -distributor.request-burst-size, or contact your service administrator."}')

Fixing the shots that failed Working out the cheapest edit that would satisfy the rule, pricing it, and changing only the seconds that were objected to. omni applied -> localized_AE.mp4 (chg_5307208a5616); rewrote the span in place with Omni; the footage is the brand's own throughout remediator 4 events 08:43:58.2

08:43:58.2 omni rewrote 1.8s in place

08:43:58.2 omni instruction: Edit this video. Edit this frame from a television commercial. Remove the painting from the saloon wall and replace it with a wooden regulator wall clock. Keep the lighting, the composition, the camera angle, the performers and every other pixel of the frame identical. Add nothing that is not already in the frame, and do not write any text into the picture. The market is United Arab Emirates. Keep everything else exactly the same: same shots, same motion, same performers, same lighting, same duration. Change nothing that was not named.

08:44:01.0 craft gate passed: length 42.131s, 1258 frames, 47.8 dB outside the edit

08:44:01.2 omni applied -> localized_AE.mp4 (chg_5307208a5616); rewrote the span in place with Omni; the footage is the brand's own throughout

Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_AE.mp4 verifier 1 event 08:44:01.2

08:44:01.2 verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_AE.mp4

Writing down what is actually there Looking at every shot once and describing what it holds -- a glass, a hemline, a logo -- in neutral sentences, with no verdict attached. Every market will argue about these same sentences. observe -> shot_2 analyst 1 event 08:44:01.2

08:44:01.2 observe -> shot_2

Getting everything ready Setting the run up and handing your commercial to the crew. snapshot store=True artifacts=15 pipeline 1 event 08:44:09.8

08:44:09.8 snapshot store=True artifacts=15

Asking every market what it thinks One adjudicator per jurisdiction, all at once, each holding its own rulebook and looking up the statute behind anything it objects to. judge -> AE (2 candidates) adjudicator 1 event 08:44:12.4

08:44:12.4 judge -> AE (2 candidates)

Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. stage_error: verify: telemetry push failed: RuntimeError('telemetry push failed: HTTP 429: {"code":8,"message":"the request has been rejected because the tenant exceeded the request rate limit, set to 75 requests/s across all distributors with a maximum allowed burst of 750 (err-mimir-tenant-max-request-rate). To adjust the related per-tenant limits, configure -distributor.request-rate-limit and -distributor.request-burst-size, or contact your service administrator."}') verifier 3 events 08:44:21.2

08:44:21.2 fixed: AE-MOD-01 no longer fires at 12.78-14.62s after omni; fnd_AE_AE-MOD-01_obs_shot_2_000 resolved

08:44:21.2 AE clearance recomputed -> blocked

08:44:21.8 stage_error: verify: telemetry push failed: RuntimeError('telemetry push failed: HTTP 429: {"code":8,"message":"the request has been rejected because the tenant exceeded the request rate limit, set to 75 requests/s across all distributors with a maximum allowed burst of 750 (err-mimir-tenant-max-request-rate). To adjust the related per-tenant limits, configure -distributor.request-rate-limit and -distributor.request-burst-size, or contact your service administrator."}')

Fixing the shots that failed Working out the cheapest edit that would satisfy the rule, pricing it, and changing only the seconds that were objected to. omni applied -> localized_AE.mp4 (chg_8a54cc30c94d); rewrote the span in place with Omni; the footage is the brand's own throughout remediator 8 events 10:03:54.1

10:03:54.1 console requested remediation: AE-MOD-01 (AE) -> fnd_AE_AE-MOD-01_obs_shot_9_000 [omni, 0.10 EUR, remedy:0]

10:03:54.1 AE-MOD-01 (AE) -> concept scope, running omni anyway: The element runs through the whole scene, so a patch cannot reach it: the scene has to be regenerated with the permitted element in its place.

10:03:54.1 AE-MOD-01 (AE) -> planned omni

10:03:54.1 omni -> fnd_AE_AE-MOD-01_obs_shot_9_000 (AE-MOD-01, AE) on localized_AE.mp4 at 32.13-32.80s

10:04:40.4 omni rewrote 0.7s in place

10:04:40.4 omni instruction: Edit this video. Edit this frame from a television commercial. Replace the pin-up painting on the saloon wall with a framed painting of grazing cattle. Keep the lighting, the composition, the camera angle, the performers and every other pixel of the frame identical. Add nothing that is not already in the frame, and do not write any text into the picture. The market is United Arab Emirates. Keep everything else exactly the same: same shots, same motion, same performers, same lighting, same duration. Change nothing that was not named.

10:04:43.2 craft gate passed: length 42.131s, 1258 frames, 48.9 dB outside the edit

10:04:43.4 omni applied -> localized_AE.mp4 (chg_8a54cc30c94d); rewrote the span in place with Omni; the footage is the brand's own throughout

Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_AE.mp4 verifier 1 event 10:04:43.4

10:04:43.4 verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_AE.mp4

Writing down what is actually there Looking at every shot once and describing what it holds -- a glass, a hemline, a logo -- in neutral sentences, with no verdict attached. Every market will argue about these same sentences. observe -> shot_9 analyst 1 event 10:04:43.4

10:04:43.4 observe -> shot_9

Asking every market what it thinks One adjudicator per jurisdiction, all at once, each holding its own rulebook and looking up the statute behind anything it objects to. citation check -> AE AE-ALC-01 for obs_shot_9_002_v01011e adjudicator 4 events 10:04:51.3

10:04:51.3 judge -> AE (6 candidates)

10:05:00.8 citation check -> AE AE-ALC-01 for obs_shot_9_000_v01011e

10:05:22.3 citation check -> AE AE-ALC-01 for obs_shot_9_001_v01011e

10:05:29.2 citation check -> AE AE-ALC-01 for obs_shot_9_002_v01011e

Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. stage_error: verify: could not carry chg_8a54cc30c94d into AE-DUBAITV: RuntimeError('footage the edit should not have touched was disturbed: 32.09 dB outside the edited span (floor 38)'); localized_AE-DUBAITV.mp4 untouched verifier 6 events 10:05:49.8

10:05:49.8 fixed: AE-MOD-01 no longer fires at 32.13-32.80s after omni; fnd_AE_AE-MOD-01_obs_shot_9_000 resolved

10:05:49.8 verification surfaced 3 new finding(s) in the edited shot(s): AE-ALC-01, AE-ALC-01, AE-ALC-01

10:05:49.8 AE clearance recomputed -> blocked

10:05:50.4 stage_error: verify: telemetry push failed: RuntimeError('telemetry push failed: HTTP 429: {"code":8,"message":"the request has been rejected because the tenant exceeded the request rate limit, set to 75 requests/s across all distributors with a maximum allowed burst of 750 (err-mimir-tenant-max-request-rate). To adjust the related per-tenant limits, configure -distributor.request-rate-limit and -distributor.request-burst-size, or contact your service administrator."}')

10:05:50.4 carrying omni from AE into AE-DUBAITV: 1 finding(s) on the same 32.13-32.80s (AE-MOD-01), no generation

10:05:59.2 stage_error: verify: could not carry chg_8a54cc30c94d into AE-DUBAITV: RuntimeError('footage the edit should not have touched was disturbed: 32.09 dB outside the edited span (floor 38)'); localized_AE-DUBAITV.mp4 untouched

Fixing the shots that failed Working out the cheapest edit that would satisfy the rule, pricing it, and changing only the seconds that were objected to. prop_swap applied -> localized_AE-DUBAITV.mp4 (chg_a7c091283014); swapped the non-compliant prop for a Dubai TV-appropriate one remediator 14 events 15:29:50.5

15:29:50.5 alert received: AE-ALC-01 AE on test -> fnd_AE_AE-ALC-01_obs_shot_9_002_v01011e

15:29:50.5 alert received: AE-ALC-01 AE-DUBAITV on test -> fnd_AE-DUBAITV_AE-ALC-01_obs_shot_0_001

15:29:50.5 alert received: AE-MOD-01 AE-DUBAITV on test -> fnd_AE-DUBAITV_AE-MOD-01_obs_shot_9_000

15:29:50.5 AE-ALC-01 (AE) -> concept scope, running prop_swap anyway: The element runs through the whole scene, so a patch cannot reach it: the scene has to be regenerated with the permitted element in its place.

15:29:50.5 alert received: AE-MOD-01 AE on test -> fnd_AE_AE-MOD-01_obs_shot_8_000

15:29:50.5 AE-ALC-01 (AE) -> planned prop_swap

15:29:50.5 prop_swap -> fnd_AE_AE-ALC-01_obs_shot_9_002_v01011e (AE-ALC-01, AE) on localized_AE.mp4 at 32.13-32.80s

15:29:50.5 AE-ALC-01 (AE-DUBAITV) -> planned prop_swap

15:29:50.5 prop_swap -> fnd_AE-DUBAITV_AE-ALC-01_obs_shot_0_001 (AE-ALC-01, AE-DUBAITV) on test.mp4 at 0.00-7.44s

15:29:50.5 one edit for 3 findings on this shot: AE-ALC-01 plus AE-ALC-01, AE-ALC-01

15:29:50.5 one edit for 2 findings on this shot: AE-ALC-01 plus AE-MOD-01

15:30:10.2 prop_swap instruction: Edit this frame from a television commercial. Replace each alcoholic drink, bottle, glass, cigarette, cigar, tobacco pack or ashtray that is already visible with a permitted equivalent for Dubai TV -- tea in the same style of glass in place of a drink, a pen or nothing at all in place of a cigarette, a closed box with no branding in place of a pack -- keeping the same number of items in the same places and adding none. Keep the lighting, the composition, the camera angle, the hands and the people exactly as they are, and change nothing else in the frame. Do not add any new object anywhere in the frame, and do not put a replacement where there was nothing before: only what is already there may change.

15:30:13.3 craft gate passed: length 42.131s, 1258 frames, 47.8 dB outside the edit

15:30:13.6 prop_swap applied -> localized_AE-DUBAITV.mp4 (chg_a7c091283014); swapped the non-compliant prop for a Dubai TV-appropriate one

Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_AE-DUBAITV.mp4 verifier 2 events 15:30:13.6

15:30:13.6 verify -> also ruling on 1 other open finding(s) in the same shot(s): AE-MOD-01

15:30:13.6 verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_AE-DUBAITV.mp4

Writing down what is actually there Looking at every shot once and describing what it holds -- a glass, a hemline, a logo -- in neutral sentences, with no verdict attached. Every market will argue about these same sentences. observe -> shot_0 analyst 1 event 15:30:13.6

15:30:13.6 observe -> shot_0

Asking every market what it thinks One adjudicator per jurisdiction, all at once, each holding its own rulebook and looking up the statute behind anything it objects to. citation check -> AE-DUBAITV AE-MOD-01 for obs_shot_0_002_vd9293d adjudicator 3 events 15:30:24.9

15:30:24.9 judge -> AE-DUBAITV (3 candidates)

15:30:33.7 citation check -> AE-DUBAITV AE-ALC-01 for obs_shot_0_001_vd9293d

15:30:40.6 citation check -> AE-DUBAITV AE-MOD-01 for obs_shot_0_002_vd9293d

Fixing the shots that failed Working out the cheapest edit that would satisfy the rule, pricing it, and changing only the seconds that were objected to. prop_swap applied -> localized_AE.mp4 (chg_84594efb04e0); swapped the non-compliant prop for a United Arab Emirates-appropriate one remediator 3 events 15:30:41.5

15:30:41.5 prop_swap instruction: Edit this frame from a television commercial. Replace each alcoholic drink, bottle, glass, cigarette, cigar, tobacco pack or ashtray that is already visible with a permitted equivalent for United Arab Emirates -- tea in the same style of glass in place of a drink, a pen or nothing at all in place of a cigarette, a closed box with no branding in place of a pack -- keeping the same number of items in the same places and adding none. Keep the lighting, the composition, the camera angle, the hands and the people exactly as they are, and change nothing else in the frame. Do not add any new object anywhere in the frame, and do not put a replacement where there was nothing before: only what is already there may change.

15:30:44.7 craft gate passed: length 42.131s, 1258 frames, 49.5 dB outside the edit

15:30:44.8 prop_swap applied -> localized_AE.mp4 (chg_84594efb04e0); swapped the non-compliant prop for a United Arab Emirates-appropriate one

Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_AE.mp4 verifier 2 events 15:30:44.8

15:30:44.8 verify -> also ruling on 2 other open finding(s) in the same shot(s): AE-ALC-01, AE-ALC-01

15:30:44.8 verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_AE.mp4

Writing down what is actually there Looking at every shot once and describing what it holds -- a glass, a hemline, a logo -- in neutral sentences, with no verdict attached. Every market will argue about these same sentences. observe -> shot_9 analyst 1 event 15:30:44.8

15:30:44.8 observe -> shot_9

Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. AE-DUBAITV clearance recomputed -> blocked verifier 3 events 15:30:46.6

15:30:46.6 still open: AE-MOD-01 continues to fire at 0.00-7.44s; fnd_AE-DUBAITV_AE-MOD-01_obs_shot_0_002 untouched

15:30:46.6 NOT fixed: AE-ALC-01 still fires at 0.00-7.44s after prop_swap; fnd_AE-DUBAITV_AE-ALC-01_obs_shot_0_001 back to open

15:30:46.6 AE-DUBAITV clearance recomputed -> blocked

Fixing the shots that failed Working out the cheapest edit that would satisfy the rule, pricing it, and changing only the seconds that were objected to. prop_swap -> fnd_AE-DUBAITV_AE-MOD-01_obs_shot_9_000 (AE-MOD-01, AE-DUBAITV) on localized_AE-DUBAITV.mp4 at 32.13-32.80s remediator 3 events 15:30:48.7

15:30:48.7 AE-MOD-01 (AE-DUBAITV) -> concept scope, running prop_swap anyway: The element runs through the whole scene, so a patch cannot reach it: the scene has to be regenerated with the permitted element in its place.

15:30:48.7 AE-MOD-01 (AE-DUBAITV) -> planned prop_swap

15:30:48.7 prop_swap -> fnd_AE-DUBAITV_AE-MOD-01_obs_shot_9_000 (AE-MOD-01, AE-DUBAITV) on localized_AE-DUBAITV.mp4 at 32.13-32.80s

Asking every market what it thinks One adjudicator per jurisdiction, all at once, each holding its own rulebook and looking up the statute behind anything it objects to. citation check -> AE AE-ALC-01 for obs_shot_9_003_v272dfb adjudicator 2 events 15:30:51.6

15:30:51.6 judge -> AE (6 candidates)

15:31:01.4 citation check -> AE AE-ALC-01 for obs_shot_9_003_v272dfb

Fixing the shots that failed Working out the cheapest edit that would satisfy the rule, pricing it, and changing only the seconds that were objected to. snapshot store=True artifacts=21 remediator 1 event 15:31:03.4

15:31:03.4 snapshot store=True artifacts=21

Asking every market what it thinks One adjudicator per jurisdiction, all at once, each holding its own rulebook and looking up the statute behind anything it objects to. citation check -> AE AE-ALC-01 for obs_shot_9_004_v272dfb adjudicator 1 event 15:31:08.7

15:31:08.7 citation check -> AE AE-ALC-01 for obs_shot_9_004_v272dfb

Fixing the shots that failed Working out the cheapest edit that would satisfy the rule, pricing it, and changing only the seconds that were objected to. prop_swap instruction: Edit this frame from a television commercial. Replace the wall painting of the draped woman with a still-life painting of desert flowers. Keep the lighting, the composition, the camera angle, the performers and every other pixel of the frame identical. Add nothing that is not already in the frame, and do not write any text into the picture. The market is Dubai TV. remediator 1 event 15:31:11.3

15:31:11.3 prop_swap instruction: Edit this frame from a television commercial. Replace the wall painting of the draped woman with a still-life painting of desert flowers. Keep the lighting, the composition, the camera angle, the performers and every other pixel of the frame identical. Add nothing that is not already in the frame, and do not write any text into the picture. The market is Dubai TV.

Asking every market what it thinks One adjudicator per jurisdiction, all at once, each holding its own rulebook and looking up the statute behind anything it objects to. citation check -> AE AE-ALC-01 for obs_shot_9_005_v272dfb adjudicator 1 event 15:31:14.5

15:31:14.5 citation check -> AE AE-ALC-01 for obs_shot_9_005_v272dfb

Fixing the shots that failed Working out the cheapest edit that would satisfy the rule, pricing it, and changing only the seconds that were objected to. prop_swap applied -> localized_AE-DUBAITV.mp4 (chg_4b60f966457d); swapped the non-compliant prop for a Dubai TV-appropriate one remediator 2 events 15:31:14.6

15:31:14.6 craft gate passed: length 42.131s, 1258 frames, 49.0 dB outside the edit

15:31:14.8 prop_swap applied -> localized_AE-DUBAITV.mp4 (chg_4b60f966457d); swapped the non-compliant prop for a Dubai TV-appropriate one

Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_AE-DUBAITV.mp4 verifier 1 event 15:31:14.8

15:31:14.8 verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_AE-DUBAITV.mp4

Writing down what is actually there Looking at every shot once and describing what it holds -- a glass, a hemline, a logo -- in neutral sentences, with no verdict attached. Every market will argue about these same sentences. observe -> shot_9 analyst 1 event 15:31:14.8

15:31:14.8 observe -> shot_9

Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. AE clearance recomputed -> blocked verifier 4 events 15:31:20.2

15:31:20.2 still open: AE-ALC-01 continues to fire at 32.13-32.80s; fnd_AE_AE-ALC-01_obs_shot_9_000_v01011e untouched

15:31:20.2 still open: AE-ALC-01 continues to fire at 32.13-32.80s; fnd_AE_AE-ALC-01_obs_shot_9_001_v01011e untouched

15:31:20.2 NOT fixed: AE-ALC-01 still fires at 32.13-32.80s after prop_swap; fnd_AE_AE-ALC-01_obs_shot_9_002_v01011e back to open

15:31:20.2 AE clearance recomputed -> blocked

Fixing the shots that failed Working out the cheapest edit that would satisfy the rule, pricing it, and changing only the seconds that were objected to. prop_swap -> fnd_AE_AE-MOD-01_obs_shot_8_000 (AE-MOD-01, AE) on localized_AE.mp4 at 31.40-32.13s remediator 3 events 15:31:20.8

15:31:20.8 AE-MOD-01 (AE) -> concept scope, running prop_swap anyway: The element runs through the whole scene, so a patch cannot reach it: the scene has to be regenerated with the permitted element in its place.

15:31:20.8 AE-MOD-01 (AE) -> planned prop_swap

15:31:20.8 prop_swap -> fnd_AE_AE-MOD-01_obs_shot_8_000 (AE-MOD-01, AE) on localized_AE.mp4 at 31.40-32.13s

Asking every market what it thinks One adjudicator per jurisdiction, all at once, each holding its own rulebook and looking up the statute behind anything it objects to. judge -> AE-DUBAITV (0 candidates) adjudicator 1 event 15:31:21.1

15:31:21.1 judge -> AE-DUBAITV (0 candidates)

Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. AE objects to the same 32.13-32.80s, but has already edited that span for itself; leaving its cut alone verifier 3 events 15:31:21.1

15:31:21.1 fixed: AE-MOD-01 no longer fires at 32.13-32.80s after prop_swap; fnd_AE-DUBAITV_AE-MOD-01_obs_shot_9_000 resolved

15:31:21.1 AE-DUBAITV clearance recomputed -> blocked

15:31:23.4 AE objects to the same 32.13-32.80s, but has already edited that span for itself; leaving its cut alone

Fixing the shots that failed Working out the cheapest edit that would satisfy the rule, pricing it, and changing only the seconds that were objected to. prop_swap applied -> localized_AE.mp4 (chg_2610c2b7d2b6); swapped the non-compliant prop for a United Arab Emirates-appropriate one remediator 5 events 15:31:23.9

15:31:23.9 snapshot store=True artifacts=7

15:31:25.4 snapshot store=True artifacts=0

15:31:40.8 prop_swap instruction: Edit this frame from a television commercial. Replace the framed painting of the reclining woman with a painting of a scenic mountain range. Keep the lighting, the composition, the camera angle, the performers and every other pixel of the frame identical. Add nothing that is not already in the frame, and do not write any text into the picture. The market is United Arab Emirates.

15:31:44.0 craft gate passed: length 42.131s, 1258 frames, 49.9 dB outside the edit

15:31:44.2 prop_swap applied -> localized_AE.mp4 (chg_2610c2b7d2b6); swapped the non-compliant prop for a United Arab Emirates-appropriate one

Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_AE.mp4 verifier 1 event 15:31:44.2

15:31:44.2 verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_AE.mp4

Writing down what is actually there Looking at every shot once and describing what it holds -- a glass, a hemline, a logo -- in neutral sentences, with no verdict attached. Every market will argue about these same sentences. observe -> shot_8 analyst 1 event 15:31:44.2

15:31:44.2 observe -> shot_8

Asking every market what it thinks One adjudicator per jurisdiction, all at once, each holding its own rulebook and looking up the statute behind anything it objects to. judge -> AE (1 candidates) adjudicator 1 event 15:31:48.5

15:31:48.5 judge -> AE (1 candidates)

Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_AE-DUBAITV.mp4 verifier 4 events 15:31:53.3

15:31:53.3 fixed: AE-MOD-01 no longer fires at 31.40-32.13s after prop_swap; fnd_AE_AE-MOD-01_obs_shot_8_000 resolved

15:31:53.3 AE clearance recomputed -> blocked

15:31:55.6 carrying prop_swap from AE into AE-DUBAITV: 1 finding(s) on the same 31.40-32.13s (AE-MOD-01), no generation

15:32:05.8 verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_AE-DUBAITV.mp4

Writing down what is actually there Looking at every shot once and describing what it holds -- a glass, a hemline, a logo -- in neutral sentences, with no verdict attached. Every market will argue about these same sentences. observe -> shot_8 analyst 1 event 15:32:05.8

15:32:05.8 observe -> shot_8

Asking every market what it thinks One adjudicator per jurisdiction, all at once, each holding its own rulebook and looking up the statute behind anything it objects to. judge -> AE-DUBAITV (2 candidates) adjudicator 1 event 15:32:12.5

15:32:12.5 judge -> AE-DUBAITV (2 candidates)

Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. AE-DUBAITV clearance recomputed -> blocked verifier 2 events 15:32:21.1

15:32:21.1 fixed: AE-MOD-01 no longer fires at 31.40-32.13s after carried over from AE; fnd_AE-DUBAITV_AE-MOD-01_obs_shot_8_000 resolved

15:32:21.1 AE-DUBAITV clearance recomputed -> blocked

Fixing the shots that failed Working out the cheapest edit that would satisfy the rule, pricing it, and changing only the seconds that were objected to. omni applied -> localized_AE.mp4 (chg_720b4f8bf5a1); rewrote the span in place with Omni; the footage is the brand's own throughout remediator 9 events 17:20:01.3

17:20:01.3 console requested remediation: AE-ALC-01 (AE) -> fnd_AE_AE-ALC-01_obs_shot_9_000_v01011e [omni, 0.10 EUR, remedy:0]

17:20:01.3 AE-ALC-01 (AE) -> concept scope, running omni anyway: The element runs through the whole scene, so a patch cannot reach it: the scene has to be regenerated with the permitted element in its place.

17:20:01.3 AE-ALC-01 (AE) -> planned omni

17:20:01.3 omni -> fnd_AE_AE-ALC-01_obs_shot_9_000_v01011e (AE-ALC-01, AE) on localized_AE.mp4 at 32.13-32.80s

17:20:01.3 one edit for 3 findings on this shot: AE-ALC-01 plus AE-ALC-01, AE-ALC-01

17:20:52.7 omni rewrote 0.7s in place

17:20:52.7 omni instruction: Edit this video. Edit this frame from a television commercial. Digitally replace the alcohol bottles on the shelves with vintage soda and sarsaparilla bottles. Keep the lighting, the composition, the camera angle, the performers and every other pixel of the frame identical. Add nothing that is not already in the frame, and do not write any text into the picture. The market is United Arab Emirates. Keep everything else exactly the same: same shots, same motion, same performers, same lighting, same duration. Change nothing that was not named.

17:20:55.9 craft gate passed: length 42.131s, 1258 frames, 50.2 dB outside the edit

17:20:56.1 omni applied -> localized_AE.mp4 (chg_720b4f8bf5a1); rewrote the span in place with Omni; the footage is the brand's own throughout

Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_AE.mp4 verifier 2 events 17:20:56.1

17:20:56.1 verify -> also ruling on 2 other open finding(s) in the same shot(s): AE-ALC-01, AE-ALC-01

17:20:56.1 verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_AE.mp4

Writing down what is actually there Looking at every shot once and describing what it holds -- a glass, a hemline, a logo -- in neutral sentences, with no verdict attached. Every market will argue about these same sentences. observe -> shot_9 analyst 1 event 17:20:56.1

17:20:56.1 observe -> shot_9

Asking every market what it thinks One adjudicator per jurisdiction, all at once, each holding its own rulebook and looking up the statute behind anything it objects to. citation check -> AE AE-ALC-01 for obs_shot_9_001_va31876 adjudicator 3 events 17:21:02.1

17:21:02.1 judge -> AE (4 candidates)

17:21:09.3 citation check -> AE AE-ALC-01 for obs_shot_9_000_va31876

17:21:15.1 citation check -> AE AE-ALC-01 for obs_shot_9_001_va31876

Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. AE clearance recomputed -> blocked verifier 4 events 17:21:20.0

17:21:20.0 still open: AE-ALC-01 continues to fire at 32.13-32.80s; fnd_AE_AE-ALC-01_obs_shot_9_001_v01011e untouched

17:21:20.0 still open: AE-ALC-01 continues to fire at 32.13-32.80s; fnd_AE_AE-ALC-01_obs_shot_9_002_v01011e untouched

17:21:20.0 NOT fixed: AE-ALC-01 still fires at 32.13-32.80s after omni; fnd_AE_AE-ALC-01_obs_shot_9_000_v01011e back to open

17:21:20.0 AE clearance recomputed -> blocked

Fixing the shots that failed Working out the cheapest edit that would satisfy the rule, pricing it, and changing only the seconds that were objected to. prop_swap applied -> localized_AE.mp4 (chg_694a8c2acfd9); swapped the non-compliant prop for a United Arab Emirates-appropriate one remediator 10 events 17:21:38.0

17:21:38.0 snapshot store=True artifacts=34

17:21:50.5 alert received: AE-MOD-01 AE on test -> fnd_AE_AE-MOD-01_obs_shot_0_002

17:21:50.5 alert received: AE-ALC-01 AE on test -> fnd_AE_AE-ALC-01_obs_shot_9_002_v01011e

17:21:50.5 AE-MOD-01 (AE) -> concept scope, running prop_swap anyway: The element runs through the whole scene, so a patch cannot reach it: the scene has to be regenerated with the permitted element in its place.

17:21:50.5 AE-MOD-01 (AE) -> planned prop_swap

17:21:50.5 prop_swap -> fnd_AE_AE-MOD-01_obs_shot_0_002 (AE-MOD-01, AE) on localized_AE.mp4 at 0.00-7.44s

17:21:50.5 one edit for 2 findings on this shot: AE-MOD-01 plus AE-ALC-01

17:22:10.5 prop_swap instruction: Edit this frame from a television commercial. Replace the pin-up painting on the saloon wall with an oil painting of a desert landscape. Keep the lighting, the composition, the camera angle, the performers and every other pixel of the frame identical. Add nothing that is not already in the frame, and do not write any text into the picture. The market is United Arab Emirates.

17:22:14.0 craft gate passed: length 42.131s, 1258 frames, 50.5 dB outside the edit

17:22:14.3 prop_swap applied -> localized_AE.mp4 (chg_694a8c2acfd9); swapped the non-compliant prop for a United Arab Emirates-appropriate one

Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_AE.mp4 verifier 2 events 17:22:14.3

17:22:14.3 verify -> also ruling on 1 other open finding(s) in the same shot(s): AE-ALC-01

17:22:14.3 verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_AE.mp4

Writing down what is actually there Looking at every shot once and describing what it holds -- a glass, a hemline, a logo -- in neutral sentences, with no verdict attached. Every market will argue about these same sentences. observe -> shot_0 analyst 1 event 17:22:14.3

17:22:14.3 observe -> shot_0

Asking every market what it thinks One adjudicator per jurisdiction, all at once, each holding its own rulebook and looking up the statute behind anything it objects to. citation check -> AE AE-ALC-01 for obs_shot_0_002_v8ff687 adjudicator 2 events 17:22:21.3

17:22:21.3 judge -> AE (1 candidates)

17:22:26.8 citation check -> AE AE-ALC-01 for obs_shot_0_002_v8ff687

Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_BE-PLAY.mp4 verifier 6 events 17:22:34.0

17:22:34.0 still open: AE-ALC-01 continues to fire at 0.00-7.44s; fnd_AE_AE-ALC-01_obs_shot_0_001 untouched

17:22:34.0 fixed: AE-MOD-01 no longer fires at 0.00-7.44s after prop_swap; fnd_AE_AE-MOD-01_obs_shot_0_002 resolved

17:22:34.0 AE clearance recomputed -> blocked

17:22:34.8 AE-DUBAITV objects to the same 0.00-7.44s, but has already edited that span for itself; leaving its cut alone

17:22:34.8 carrying prop_swap from AE into BE-PLAY: 1 finding(s) on the same 0.00-7.44s (BE-LANG-01), no generation

17:22:46.0 verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_BE-PLAY.mp4

Writing down what is actually there Looking at every shot once and describing what it holds -- a glass, a hemline, a logo -- in neutral sentences, with no verdict attached. Every market will argue about these same sentences. observe -> shot_0 analyst 1 event 17:22:46.0

17:22:46.0 observe -> shot_0

Asking every market what it thinks One adjudicator per jurisdiction, all at once, each holding its own rulebook and looking up the statute behind anything it objects to. citation check -> BE-PLAY BE-ALC-01 for obs_shot_0_003_vb8d86f adjudicator 4 events 17:22:53.6

17:22:53.6 judge -> BE-PLAY (4 candidates)

17:23:09.8 citation check -> BE-PLAY BE-LANG-01 for obs_shot_0_000_vb8d86f

17:23:23.4 citation check -> BE-PLAY EU-ALC-01 for obs_shot_0_003_vb8d86f

17:23:32.0 citation check -> BE-PLAY BE-ALC-01 for obs_shot_0_003_vb8d86f

Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_BE-RTBF.mp4 verifier 5 events 17:23:38.2

17:23:38.2 NOT fixed: BE-LANG-01 still fires at 0.00-7.44s after carried over from AE; fnd_BE-PLAY_BE-LANG-01_obs_shot_0_000 back to open

17:23:38.2 verification surfaced 2 new finding(s) in the edited shot(s): BE-ALC-01, EU-ALC-01

17:23:38.2 BE-PLAY clearance recomputed -> blocked

17:23:40.4 carrying prop_swap from AE into BE-RTBF: 1 finding(s) on the same 0.00-7.44s (BE-LANG-01), no generation

17:23:52.6 verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_BE-RTBF.mp4

Writing down what is actually there Looking at every shot once and describing what it holds -- a glass, a hemline, a logo -- in neutral sentences, with no verdict attached. Every market will argue about these same sentences. observe -> shot_0 analyst 1 event 17:23:52.6

17:23:52.6 observe -> shot_0

Fixing the shots that failed Working out the cheapest edit that would satisfy the rule, pricing it, and changing only the seconds that were objected to. one edit for 3 findings on this shot: EU-ALC-01 plus BE-LANG-01, BE-ALC-01 remediator 4 events 17:23:55.5

17:23:55.5 alert received: EU-ALC-01 BE-PLAY on test -> fnd_BE-PLAY_EU-ALC-01_obs_shot_0_003_vb8d86f

17:23:55.5 EU-ALC-01 (BE-PLAY) -> planned prop_swap

17:23:55.5 prop_swap -> fnd_BE-PLAY_EU-ALC-01_obs_shot_0_003_vb8d86f (EU-ALC-01, BE-PLAY) on localized_BE-PLAY.mp4 at 0.00-7.44s

17:23:55.5 one edit for 3 findings on this shot: EU-ALC-01 plus BE-LANG-01, BE-ALC-01

Asking every market what it thinks One adjudicator per jurisdiction, all at once, each holding its own rulebook and looking up the statute behind anything it objects to. judge -> BE-RTBF (7 candidates) adjudicator 1 event 17:24:08.7

17:24:08.7 judge -> BE-RTBF (7 candidates)

Fixing the shots that failed Working out the cheapest edit that would satisfy the rule, pricing it, and changing only the seconds that were objected to. prop_swap instruction: Edit this frame from a television commercial. Replace each alcoholic drink, bottle, glass, cigarette, cigar, tobacco pack or ashtray that is already visible with a permitted equivalent for Play (Belgium, Flanders) -- tea in the same style of glass in place of a drink, a pen or nothing at all in place of a cigarette, a closed box with no branding in place of a pack -- keeping the same number of items in the same places and adding none. Keep the lighting, the composition, the camera angle, the hands and the people exactly as they are, and change nothing else in the frame. Do not add any new object anywhere in the frame, and do not put a replacement where there was nothing before: only what is already there may change. remediator 1 event 17:24:13.1

17:24:13.1 prop_swap instruction: Edit this frame from a television commercial. Replace each alcoholic drink, bottle, glass, cigarette, cigar, tobacco pack or ashtray that is already visible with a permitted equivalent for Play (Belgium, Flanders) -- tea in the same style of glass in place of a drink, a pen or nothing at all in place of a cigarette, a closed box with no branding in place of a pack -- keeping the same number of items in the same places and adding none. Keep the lighting, the composition, the camera angle, the hands and the people exactly as they are, and change nothing else in the frame. Do not add any new object anywhere in the frame, and do not put a replacement where there was nothing before: only what is already there may change.

Asking every market what it thinks One adjudicator per jurisdiction, all at once, each holding its own rulebook and looking up the statute behind anything it objects to. judge -> BE-RTBF (7 candidates) adjudicator 1 event 17:24:13.9

17:24:13.9 judge -> BE-RTBF (7 candidates)

Fixing the shots that failed Working out the cheapest edit that would satisfy the rule, pricing it, and changing only the seconds that were objected to. prop_swap applied -> localized_BE-PLAY.mp4 (chg_9c8b8a1d6624); swapped the non-compliant prop for a Play (Belgium, Flanders)-appropriate one remediator 2 events 17:24:17.1

17:24:17.1 craft gate passed: length 42.131s, 1258 frames, 49.1 dB outside the edit

17:24:17.4 prop_swap applied -> localized_BE-PLAY.mp4 (chg_9c8b8a1d6624); swapped the non-compliant prop for a Play (Belgium, Flanders)-appropriate one

Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_BE-PLAY.mp4 verifier 2 events 17:24:17.4

17:24:17.4 verify -> also ruling on 2 other open finding(s) in the same shot(s): BE-LANG-01, BE-ALC-01

17:24:17.4 verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_BE-PLAY.mp4

Writing down what is actually there Looking at every shot once and describing what it holds -- a glass, a hemline, a logo -- in neutral sentences, with no verdict attached. Every market will argue about these same sentences. observe -> shot_0 analyst 1 event 17:24:17.4

17:24:17.4 observe -> shot_0

Asking every market what it thinks One adjudicator per jurisdiction, all at once, each holding its own rulebook and looking up the statute behind anything it objects to. citation check -> BE-PLAY BE-LANG-01 for obs_shot_0_000_v34b518 adjudicator 3 events 17:24:24.0

17:24:24.0 judge -> BE-PLAY (4 candidates)

17:24:37.0 citation check -> BE-RTBF BE-LANG-01 for obs_shot_0_000_v345721

17:24:42.0 citation check -> BE-PLAY BE-LANG-01 for obs_shot_0_000_v34b518

Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. BE-RTBF clearance recomputed -> cleared verifier 9 events 17:24:51.9

17:24:51.9 still open: BE-LANG-01 continues to fire at 0.00-7.44s; fnd_BE-PLAY_BE-LANG-01_obs_shot_0_000 untouched

17:24:51.9 incidentally fixed: BE-ALC-01 no longer fires at 0.00-7.44s; fnd_BE-PLAY_BE-ALC-01_obs_shot_0_003_vb8d86f resolved without having been the target

17:24:51.9 fixed: EU-ALC-01 no longer fires at 0.00-7.44s after prop_swap; fnd_BE-PLAY_EU-ALC-01_obs_shot_0_003_vb8d86f resolved

17:24:51.9 BE-PLAY clearance recomputed -> cleared

17:24:52.7 AE objects to the same 0.00-7.44s, but has already edited that span for itself; leaving its cut alone

17:24:52.7 AE-DUBAITV objects to the same 0.00-7.44s, but has already edited that span for itself; leaving its cut alone

17:24:52.7 carrying prop_swap from BE-PLAY into BE-VRT: 1 finding(s) on the same 0.00-7.44s (BE-LANG-01), no generation

17:25:01.3 NOT fixed: BE-LANG-01 still fires at 0.00-7.44s after carried over from AE; fnd_BE-RTBF_BE-LANG-01_obs_shot_0_000 back to open

17:25:01.3 BE-RTBF clearance recomputed -> cleared

Fixing the shots that failed Working out the cheapest edit that would satisfy the rule, pricing it, and changing only the seconds that were objected to. one edit for 3 findings on this shot: AE-ALC-01 plus AE-ALC-01, AE-ALC-01 remediator 4 events 17:25:01.9

17:25:01.9 AE-ALC-01 (AE) -> concept scope, running prop_swap anyway: The element runs through the whole scene, so a patch cannot reach it: the scene has to be regenerated with the permitted element in its place.

17:25:01.9 AE-ALC-01 (AE) -> planned prop_swap

17:25:01.9 prop_swap -> fnd_AE_AE-ALC-01_obs_shot_9_002_v01011e (AE-ALC-01, AE) on localized_AE.mp4 at 32.13-32.80s

17:25:01.9 one edit for 3 findings on this shot: AE-ALC-01 plus AE-ALC-01, AE-ALC-01

Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_BE-VRT.mp4 verifier 1 event 17:25:04.7

17:25:04.7 verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_BE-VRT.mp4

Writing down what is actually there Looking at every shot once and describing what it holds -- a glass, a hemline, a logo -- in neutral sentences, with no verdict attached. Every market will argue about these same sentences. observe -> shot_0 analyst 1 event 17:25:04.7

17:25:04.7 observe -> shot_0

Asking every market what it thinks One adjudicator per jurisdiction, all at once, each holding its own rulebook and looking up the statute behind anything it objects to. judge -> BE-VRT (5 candidates) adjudicator 1 event 17:25:14.5

17:25:14.5 judge -> BE-VRT (5 candidates)

Fixing the shots that failed Working out the cheapest edit that would satisfy the rule, pricing it, and changing only the seconds that were objected to. prop_swap applied -> localized_AE.mp4 (chg_076a03e0dc1f); swapped the non-compliant prop for a United Arab Emirates-appropriate one remediator 4 events 17:25:16.9

17:25:16.9 snapshot store=True artifacts=19

17:25:21.7 prop_swap instruction: Edit this frame from a television commercial. Replace each alcoholic drink, bottle, glass, cigarette, cigar, tobacco pack or ashtray that is already visible with a permitted equivalent for United Arab Emirates -- tea in the same style of glass in place of a drink, a pen or nothing at all in place of a cigarette, a closed box with no branding in place of a pack -- keeping the same number of items in the same places and adding none. Keep the lighting, the composition, the camera angle, the hands and the people exactly as they are, and change nothing else in the frame. Do not add any new object anywhere in the frame, and do not put a replacement where there was nothing before: only what is already there may change.

17:25:25.1 craft gate passed: length 42.131s, 1258 frames, 50.6 dB outside the edit

17:25:25.3 prop_swap applied -> localized_AE.mp4 (chg_076a03e0dc1f); swapped the non-compliant prop for a United Arab Emirates-appropriate one

Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_AE.mp4 verifier 2 events 17:25:25.3

17:25:25.3 verify -> also ruling on 2 other open finding(s) in the same shot(s): AE-ALC-01, AE-ALC-01

17:25:25.3 verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_AE.mp4

Writing down what is actually there Looking at every shot once and describing what it holds -- a glass, a hemline, a logo -- in neutral sentences, with no verdict attached. Every market will argue about these same sentences. observe -> shot_9 analyst 1 event 17:25:25.3

17:25:25.3 observe -> shot_9

Asking every market what it thinks One adjudicator per jurisdiction, all at once, each holding its own rulebook and looking up the statute behind anything it objects to. citation check -> AE AE-ALC-01 for obs_shot_9_003_v81891a adjudicator 5 events 17:25:32.4

17:25:32.4 judge -> AE (5 candidates)

17:25:40.7 citation check -> BE-VRT BE-LANG-01 for obs_shot_0_000_v872275

17:25:49.2 citation check -> AE AE-ALC-01 for obs_shot_9_001_v81891a

17:25:56.3 citation check -> BE-VRT BE-VRT-ALC-01 for obs_shot_0_001_v872275

17:25:57.1 citation check -> AE AE-ALC-01 for obs_shot_9_003_v81891a

Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. BE-VRT clearance recomputed -> at_risk verifier 7 events 17:26:02.7

17:26:02.7 still open: AE-ALC-01 continues to fire at 32.13-32.80s; fnd_AE_AE-ALC-01_obs_shot_9_000_v01011e untouched

17:26:02.7 still open: AE-ALC-01 continues to fire at 32.13-32.80s; fnd_AE_AE-ALC-01_obs_shot_9_001_v01011e untouched

17:26:02.7 NOT fixed: AE-ALC-01 still fires at 32.13-32.80s after prop_swap; fnd_AE_AE-ALC-01_obs_shot_9_002_v01011e back to open

17:26:02.7 AE clearance recomputed -> blocked

17:26:07.4 NOT fixed: BE-LANG-01 still fires at 0.00-7.44s after carried over from BE-PLAY; fnd_BE-VRT_BE-LANG-01_obs_shot_0_000 back to open

17:26:07.4 verification surfaced 1 new finding(s) in the edited shot(s): BE-VRT-ALC-01

17:26:07.4 BE-VRT clearance recomputed -> at_risk

Fixing the shots that failed Working out the cheapest edit that would satisfy the rule, pricing it, and changing only the seconds that were objected to. prop_swap applied -> localized_AE-DUBAITV.mp4 (chg_75eb4c33d5e3); swapped the non-compliant prop for a Dubai TV-appropriate one remediator 14 events 17:26:09.9

17:26:09.9 snapshot store=True artifacts=7

08:58:50.5 alert received: AE-ALC-01 AE-DUBAITV on test -> fnd_AE-DUBAITV_AE-ALC-01_obs_shot_0_001

08:58:50.5 alert received: AE-MOD-01 AE-DUBAITV on test -> fnd_AE-DUBAITV_AE-MOD-01_obs_shot_2_000

08:58:50.5 alert received: AE-ALC-01 AE on test -> fnd_AE_AE-ALC-01_obs_shot_9_002_v01011e

08:58:50.8 AE-ALC-01 (AE) -> concept scope, running omni anyway: The element runs through the whole scene, so a patch cannot reach it: the scene has to be regenerated with the permitted element in its place.

08:58:50.8 AE-ALC-01 (AE) -> planned omni

08:58:50.8 omni -> fnd_AE_AE-ALC-01_obs_shot_9_002_v01011e (AE-ALC-01, AE) on localized_AE.mp4 at 32.13-32.80s

08:58:50.8 one edit for 3 findings on this shot: AE-ALC-01 plus AE-ALC-01, AE-ALC-01

08:58:50.9 AE-ALC-01 (AE-DUBAITV) -> planned prop_swap

08:58:50.9 prop_swap -> fnd_AE-DUBAITV_AE-ALC-01_obs_shot_0_001 (AE-ALC-01, AE-DUBAITV) on localized_AE-DUBAITV.mp4 at 0.00-7.44s

08:58:50.9 one edit for 2 findings on this shot: AE-ALC-01 plus AE-MOD-01

08:59:11.4 prop_swap instruction: Edit this frame from a television commercial. Replace each alcoholic drink, bottle, glass, cigarette, cigar, pipe, e-cigarette, tobacco pack or ashtray that is already visible with a permitted equivalent for Dubai TV -- tea in the same style of glass in place of a drink, a pen or nothing at all in place of anything smoked, a closed box with no branding in place of a pack -- keeping the same number of items in the same places and adding none. The replacement must not itself be alcohol, tobacco, a smoking device or a drug in any form: a cigar changed into a cigarette is the same finding again. Nothing in the finished shot may be lit, smoking, or giving off vapour, ash or embers. Keep the lighting, the composition, the camera angle, the hands and the people exactly as they are, and change nothing else in the frame. Do not add any new object anywhere in the frame, and do not put a replacement where there was nothing before: only what is already there may change.

08:59:15.6 craft gate passed: length 42.131s, 1258 frames, 50.2 dB outside the edit, 48.8 dB inside it away from the box

08:59:15.9 prop_swap applied -> localized_AE-DUBAITV.mp4 (chg_75eb4c33d5e3); swapped the non-compliant prop for a Dubai TV-appropriate one

Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_AE-DUBAITV.mp4 verifier 2 events 08:59:15.9

08:59:15.9 verify -> also ruling on 1 other open finding(s) in the same shot(s): AE-MOD-01

08:59:15.9 verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_AE-DUBAITV.mp4

Writing down what is actually there Looking at every shot once and describing what it holds -- a glass, a hemline, a logo -- in neutral sentences, with no verdict attached. Every market will argue about these same sentences. observe -> shot_0 analyst 1 event 08:59:15.9

08:59:15.9 observe -> shot_0

Asking every market what it thinks One adjudicator per jurisdiction, all at once, each holding its own rulebook and looking up the statute behind anything it objects to. citation check -> AE-DUBAITV AE-MOD-01 for obs_shot_0_003_v30cdc7 adjudicator 3 events 08:59:22.4

08:59:22.4 judge -> AE-DUBAITV (3 candidates)

08:59:31.4 citation check -> AE-DUBAITV AE-ALC-01 for obs_shot_0_002_v30cdc7

08:59:39.6 citation check -> AE-DUBAITV AE-MOD-01 for obs_shot_0_003_v30cdc7

Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. AE-DUBAITV clearance recomputed -> blocked verifier 3 events 08:59:46.4

08:59:46.4 still open: AE-MOD-01 continues to fire at 0.00-7.44s; fnd_AE-DUBAITV_AE-MOD-01_obs_shot_0_002 untouched

08:59:46.4 NOT fixed: AE-ALC-01 still fires at 0.00-7.44s after prop_swap; fnd_AE-DUBAITV_AE-ALC-01_obs_shot_0_001 back to open

08:59:46.4 AE-DUBAITV clearance recomputed -> blocked

Fixing the shots that failed Working out the cheapest edit that would satisfy the rule, pricing it, and changing only the seconds that were objected to. omni applied -> localized_AE.mp4 (chg_cbdd1e80f1a5); rewrote the span in place with Omni; the footage is the brand's own throughout remediator 7 events 08:59:47.5

08:59:47.5 AE-MOD-01 (AE-DUBAITV) -> concept scope, running omni anyway: The element runs through the whole scene, so a patch cannot reach it: the scene has to be regenerated with the permitted element in its place.

08:59:47.5 AE-MOD-01 (AE-DUBAITV) -> planned omni

08:59:47.5 omni -> fnd_AE-DUBAITV_AE-MOD-01_obs_shot_2_000 (AE-MOD-01, AE-DUBAITV) on localized_AE-DUBAITV.mp4 at 12.78-14.62s

08:59:52.9 omni rewrote 0.7s in place

08:59:52.9 omni instruction: Edit this video. Edit this frame from a television commercial. Replace each alcoholic drink, bottle, glass, cigarette, cigar, pipe, e-cigarette, tobacco pack or ashtray that is already visible with a permitted equivalent for United Arab Emirates -- tea in the same style of glass in place of a drink, a pen or nothing at all in place of anything smoked, a closed box with no branding in place of a pack -- keeping the same number of items in the same places and adding none. The replacement must not itself be alcohol, tobacco, a smoking device or a drug in any form: a cigar changed into a cigarette is the same finding again. Nothing in the finished shot may be lit, smoking, or giving off vapour, ash or embers. Keep the lighting, the composition, the camera angle, the hands and the people exactly as they are, and change nothing else in the frame. Do not add any new object anywhere in the frame, and do not put a replacement where there was nothing before: only what is already there may change. Keep everything else exactly the same: same shots, same motion, same performers, same lighting, same duration. Change nothing that was not named.

08:59:57.9 craft gate passed: length 42.131s, 1258 frames, 50.8 dB outside the edit, 14.6 dB inside it away from the box

08:59:58.1 omni applied -> localized_AE.mp4 (chg_cbdd1e80f1a5); rewrote the span in place with Omni; the footage is the brand's own throughout

Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_AE.mp4 verifier 2 events 08:59:58.1

08:59:58.1 verify -> also ruling on 2 other open finding(s) in the same shot(s): AE-ALC-01, AE-ALC-01

08:59:58.1 verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_AE.mp4

Writing down what is actually there Looking at every shot once and describing what it holds -- a glass, a hemline, a logo -- in neutral sentences, with no verdict attached. Every market will argue about these same sentences. observe -> shot_9 analyst 1 event 08:59:58.1

08:59:58.1 observe -> shot_9

Asking every market what it thinks One adjudicator per jurisdiction, all at once, each holding its own rulebook and looking up the statute behind anything it objects to. judge -> AE (5 candidates) adjudicator 1 event 09:00:06.9

09:00:06.9 judge -> AE (5 candidates)

Fixing the shots that failed Working out the cheapest edit that would satisfy the rule, pricing it, and changing only the seconds that were objected to. snapshot store=True artifacts=15 remediator 1 event 09:00:09.3

09:00:09.3 snapshot store=True artifacts=15

Asking every market what it thinks One adjudicator per jurisdiction, all at once, each holding its own rulebook and looking up the statute behind anything it objects to. folded a second AE-ALC-01 on the same span for AE (obs_shot_9_003_v048d84 after obs_shot_9_000_v048d84) adjudicator 3 events 09:00:16.8

09:00:16.8 citation check -> AE AE-ALC-01 for obs_shot_9_000_v048d84

09:00:21.5 folded a second AE-ALC-01 on the same span for AE (obs_shot_9_002_v048d84 after obs_shot_9_000_v048d84)

09:00:21.5 folded a second AE-ALC-01 on the same span for AE (obs_shot_9_003_v048d84 after obs_shot_9_000_v048d84)

Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. AE clearance recomputed -> blocked verifier 4 events 09:00:21.5

09:00:21.5 still open: AE-ALC-01 continues to fire at 32.13-32.80s; fnd_AE_AE-ALC-01_obs_shot_9_000_v01011e untouched

09:00:21.5 still open: AE-ALC-01 continues to fire at 32.13-32.80s; fnd_AE_AE-ALC-01_obs_shot_9_001_v01011e untouched

09:00:21.5 NOT fixed: AE-ALC-01 still fires at 32.13-32.80s after omni; fnd_AE_AE-ALC-01_obs_shot_9_002_v01011e back to open

09:00:21.5 AE clearance recomputed -> blocked

Fixing the shots that failed Working out the cheapest edit that would satisfy the rule, pricing it, and changing only the seconds that were objected to. omni applied -> localized_AE-DUBAITV.mp4 (chg_ccd899ee8ee7); rewrote the span in place with Omni; the footage is the brand's own throughout remediator 5 events 09:00:25.6

09:00:25.6 snapshot store=True artifacts=2

09:00:50.5 omni rewrote 1.8s in place

09:00:50.5 omni instruction: Edit this video. Edit this frame from a television commercial. Replace the painting of the reclining woman with a framed oil painting of a horse. Keep the lighting, the composition, the camera angle, the performers and every other pixel of the frame identical. Add nothing that is not already in the frame, and do not write any text into the picture. The market is Dubai TV. Keep everything else exactly the same: same shots, same motion, same performers, same lighting, same duration. Change nothing that was not named.

09:00:54.7 craft gate passed: length 42.131s, 1258 frames, 50.2 dB outside the edit, 16.7 dB inside it away from the box

09:00:54.9 omni applied -> localized_AE-DUBAITV.mp4 (chg_ccd899ee8ee7); rewrote the span in place with Omni; the footage is the brand's own throughout

Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_AE-DUBAITV.mp4 verifier 1 event 09:00:54.9

09:00:54.9 verify -> re-observing 1 touched shot(s) of localized_AE-DUBAITV.mp4

Writing down what is actually there Looking at every shot once and describing what it holds -- a glass, a hemline, a logo -- in neutral sentences, with no verdict attached. Every market will argue about these same sentences. observe -> shot_2 analyst 1 event 09:00:54.9

09:00:54.9 observe -> shot_2

Asking every market what it thinks One adjudicator per jurisdiction, all at once, each holding its own rulebook and looking up the statute behind anything it objects to. judge -> AE-DUBAITV (2 candidates) adjudicator 1 event 09:01:04.4

09:01:04.4 judge -> AE-DUBAITV (2 candidates)

Checking the fix actually worked Watching the changed shots again with the same eye that found the problem, to confirm it is gone and that nothing new broke. AE-DUBAITV clearance recomputed -> blocked verifier 2 events 09:01:11.8

09:01:11.8 fixed: AE-MOD-01 no longer fires at 12.78-14.62s after omni; fnd_AE-DUBAITV_AE-MOD-01_obs_shot_2_000 resolved

09:01:11.8 AE-DUBAITV clearance recomputed -> blocked

Working The crew is busy on this run. snapshot store=True artifacts=2 operator 9 events 14:14:04.0

14:14:04.0 edit deleted: chg_a7c091283014 and 5 file(s)

14:14:15.8 snapshot store=True artifacts=0

14:14:21.0 edit deleted: chg_2610c2b7d2b6 and 5 file(s)

14:14:23.0 snapshot store=True artifacts=0

15:35:28.6 edit deleted: chg_c4dcc56b4d8d and 4 file(s)

19:33:02.0 edit deleted: chg_694a8c2acfd9 and 5 file(s)

19:33:18.7 snapshot store=True artifacts=18

19:14:10.7 edit deleted: chg_89c6cf794ba5 and 6 file(s)

19:14:14.1 snapshot store=True artifacts=2